It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Volcanic ash is often neglected in climate simulations because ash particles are assumed to have a short atmospheric lifetime, and to not participate in sulfur chemistry. After the Mt. Kelut eruption in 2014, stratospheric ash-rich aerosols were observed for months. Here we show that the persistence of super-micron ash is consistent with a density near 0.5 g cm−3, close to pumice. Ash-rich particles dominate the volcanic cloud optical properties for the first 60 days. We also find that the initial SO2 lifetime is determined by SO2 uptake on ash, rather than by reaction with OH as commonly assumed. About 43% more volcanic sulfur is removed from the stratosphere in 2 months with the SO2 heterogeneous chemistry on ash particles than without. This research suggests the need for re-evaluation of factors controlling SO2 lifetime in climate model simulations, and of the impact of volcanic ash on stratospheric chemistry and radiation.
Volcanic ash is often neglected in climate simulations as it is assumed to have a short atmospheric lifetime. Here, the authors show a persistent super-micron ash layer after the Mt. Kelut eruption in 2014 that impacts the stratospheric sulfur burden and chemistry for over the first months after the eruption.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)
2 University of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564); University of Colorado, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)
3 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Laboratory, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.57828.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 9680)
4 University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)
5 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.3532.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 1266 2261); Jinan University, Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.258164.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 3548)
6 Stratton Park Engineering Company, Inc, Bo ulder, USA (GRID:grid.427349.f)