1. Introduction
Spinel ferrite nanoparticles such as NiZn, MnZn have gained much attention for several applications [1,2,3,4,5], including high frequency circuits, the cores of radiofrequency (RF) transformers, inductors, antennas and radar absorbing materials, based on their high resistivity and low loss at high frequency. They also have great potential as an efficient catalysts and/or catalyst supports for decomposing organic or inorganic pollutants [6,7]. NiZn ferrite nanoparticles are becoming more and more important in the field of bio-medical applications for instance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), drug delivery systems and hyperthermia treatment of cancer by using their appropriate magnetic properties, antimicrobial activity and biological compatibility [8,9].
Figure 1 shows the spinel structure (the lattice parameter is about 0.84 nm) is formed by 24 cations (Fe2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, Gd2+) and 32 O2− anions and generally has a chemical form of AB2O4, which is designated as a cubic closed-packing of O2− ions [10,11,12,13]. The round and the square brackets represent the tetrahedral interstitial A site and the larger octahedral interstitial B site, respectively. Zinc ferrite is called a normal spinel structure of the form ZnFe2O4, where Zn2+ ions occupy the tetrahedral sites and Fe3+ ions occupy the octahedral sites [13]. Nickel ferrite is called an inverse spinel structure of the form FeNiFeO4, where Ni2+ ions occupy the octahedral sites, and half the Fe3+ ions occupy the tetrahedral sites and the other half occupy the octahedral sites [10]. NiZn ferrite is a kind of solid solution composed of Ni ferrite and Zn ferrite, which can be expressed as the form ZnxFe(1−x)Ni(1−x)Fe(1+x)O4. The magnetic properties of the NiZn ferrite are strongly dependent on the number of 3d unpaired electrons of transition metals. The Zn2+ ions do not have any unpaired electrons (or Bohr magneton) in the 3d orbital, while Ni2+ ions have two unpaired electrons and Fe3+ ions have five unpaired electrons in the 3d orbital. Therefore, the appropriate loading of the Ni2+ ion, which has unpaired electrons into the crystal structure of ZnFe2O4 provides much better magnetic properties, e.g., higher saturation magnetization (Ms) and lower coercivity (Hc) [14,15] because an addition of transition metal ions leads to the movement of some Fe3+ ions from the octahedral sites to the tetrahedral sites, and the unequal of Fe3+ ions in both lattice sites effectively produce the remainder of unpaired electrons, which generate and increase the magnetism [16].
In general, with a reduction in particle size, the coercive force gradually increases until it reaches the maximum value, but if the size of the particle is reduced to a critical size, the thermal effect becomes even more intense and produces super paramagnetic characteristics in which each particle becomes a single domain with not only very low magnetic loss but also very high magnetic permeability [17,18]. Moreover, the superparamagnetic particles have a zero coercive force and high magnetization, so the control of the particle size is very important because the properties of the nanocrystals strongly depend upon that. Properties of NiZn ferrite nanoparticles are greatly sensitive to the synthesis method and its preparation conditions. There are many methods for the synthesis of ferrite nanoparticles, including sol-gel, co-precipitation, high energy ball milling and thermal decomposition [19,20,21,22,23]. Thermal decomposition method has more advantages than other methods in synthesizing uniform and fine-nanoparticles with a high crystallinity. Also, it is easy to control particle size and particle size distribution with this method [24,25].
The morphology and composition of magnetic nanoparticles have a great influence on their magnetic properties not only in their own particles but also in bulk samples after sintering. When the saturation magnetization of magnetic nanoparticles increases, the initial permeability generally also increases according to the relationship of μi′ = MsD/K1, where K1 = MsHc/0.96 is the crystalline anisotropy constant, Ms is the saturation magnetization, Hc is the coercivity and D is the average grain size [26,27]. However, there are few studies available in the literature showing the relationship that the permeabilities of sintered magnetic samples are inversely proportional to their magnetization value, and explaining the relationship in detail. Therefore, it seems to be beneficial studying NiZn ferrite systems showing these magnetic behavioral relationships in understanding and improving magnetic properties.
In this paper, we synthesized Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) ferrite nanoparticles by the thermal decomposition method and examined the influence of the Ni/Zn ratio on the crystal structures, microstructures and magnetic properties of the prepared NiZn ferrites using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), an impedance analyzer and a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM).
2. Materials and Methods
Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nano-particles were synthesized by a thermal decomposition method as shown in Figure 2. The raw materials were nickel(II) acetylacetonate (97%), zinc acetylacetonate hydrate (95%), iron(III) acetylacetonate (97%). Oleic acid (90%) and oleylamine (70%) were used as a surfactant, 1,2-hexadecandediol (90%) as a reducing agent, and benzyl ether (98%) as a solvent. Ni, Zn and Fe-acetylacetonate precursors were weighed, respectively according to the chemical form of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) and poured into a 500 mL three neck flask that was filled with a mixed solution of 6 mmol oleic acid, 6 mmol oleylamine, 1,2-hexadecandediol(HDD), and 20 mL benzyl ether. The precursor solution was heated to 200 °C for 1 h, then further heated to 300 °C and kept there for 1 h; the process was carried out in a N2 atmosphere with refluxing using cooling water. The solution that finished the reaction was cooled to room temperature, centrifuged for 30 min at a speed of 4000 rpm and washed repeatedly with hexane and ethanol in order to separate organic remains from the ferrite particles. Hexane was used to dissolve fat acids such as oleic acid and oleylamine. Finally, Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nanoparticles were collected and dried at 100 °C for 24 h.
Toroidal samples of NiZn ferrites were fabricated by uniaxial pressing. The ferrite powder was mixed with a PVA (Polyvinyl alcohol, 5 wt %) binder solution, which was poured into a toroidal shaped mold and applied with a pressure of 1 ton/cm2 to make green toroidal samples. The green toroidal samples were burned out at 650 °C for 30 min in air and then sintered at 1250 °C for 2 h.
The phase purity of the NiZn ferrites nanoparticles was investigated with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD: D/max 2200 V/PC, Rigaku Co., Akishima, Japan). Microstructures of sintered toroidal ferrite samples were observed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, JSM 6700F, JEOL, Japan). Magnetic permeability (μ′, μ″) was measured from 1 MHz to 1 GHz with an Impedance analyzer (E4991A). Saturation magnetization of the ferrite particles was measured with a Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM).
3. Results
Figure 3a–c shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nanoparticles, which indicate a pure spinel structure for all three ferrites without any second phases regardless of the composition.
Figure 4 shows the dependence of the lattice parameters of the ferrite nanoparticles on the Ni concentration, which were calculated with the following equation [28].
The lattice parameter increases monotonically from 8.340 Å to 8.358 Å with increasing Zn concentration from x = 0.5 to 0.7, which is due to the fact that the ionic radius of the Zn2+ ion (0.74 Å) is larger than that of the Ni2+ ion (0.69 Å). This result means that some Zn ions appear to be incorporated into Ni site, considering that the larger Zn2+ ions prefer tetrahedral A-sites, but the smaller Ni2+ ions prefer octahedral B-sites in the crystalline spinel structure. The lattice volume of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 was also increased with increasing Zn concentration, which is reasonable considering the difference in their ionic radii.
Figure 5 shows the dependence of the crystallite size of ferrite nanoparticles on the Zn concentration, in which the average size (D) of crystallites was calculated from (311) peak using Scherer’s equation as shown below.
where the constant k = 0.89, λ = 1.5406 Å, and β is the FWHM of the (311) diffraction peak. Regardless of the Zn concentration, the crystallite size was in the range of 46 to 51 nm and there was no significant difference in it.Figure 6 shows the hysteresis curve of NiZn ferrite nanoparticles at room temperature. As the Zn ion concentration increases from x = 0.5 to 0.7 in Ni1−xZnxFe2O4, the saturation magnetization and the coercivity decreases from 83 to 71 emu/g and from 18.54 to 16.48 Oe, respectively, which is considered high compared to some other results. The magnetic properties of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 depends on its chemical composition, grain size, preparation method, and the arrangement of cation between two interstitial sites [29]. The ferrite under an applied field has two magnetization processes: domain wall motion and magnetization rotation within domains. In general, domain wall motion is sensitive to extrinsic material features such as grain size and grain-boundary structure, the presence of inclusions or pores within the grains, impurity levels and stresses. Figure 7 shows the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 particles are considered single domain particles, taking into account the fact that the crystallite size gotten from the XRD is almost the same as the particle size obtained from the FE-SEM image. Therefore, it appears that the high saturation magnetization is mainly due to an arrangement of cations on the sub-lattices A and B. The decrease in the saturation magnetization with Zn ion content is well complied with the report that the Curie temperature, which means the transition temperature between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phase, decreases rapidly with increasing nonmagnetic Zn ions in NiZn ferrite [29].
The saturated magnetization of ferrite is proportional to the difference in sub-lattice magnetization associated with octahedral and tetrahedral sites. In normal spinel, tetrahedral sites are occupied by divalent cations, while in reverse spinel these sites are filled by trivalent cations. ZnFe2O4 is reported as normal spinel, but NiFe2O4 is inverse spinel. The combination of ZnFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 form a solid solution Ni1−xZnxFe2O4. With increase in Zn content, Fe+3 in the tetrahedral sites are replaced by Zn2+ cations and Fe+3 fill the octahedral sites emptied by Ni2+. Zn2+ ion doesn’t contain any unpaired electrons, however, Ni2+ ion has two and Fe+3 ion has five unpaired electrons. The following convention has been adopted to define the location of cations in the octahedral and tetrahedral sites of ferrite:
Zn2+(Fe23+)O4 | normal spinel |
Fe3+(Ni2+Fe3+)O4 | inverse spinel |
Zny2+ Fe1−y3+(Ni1−y2+ Fe1+y3+)O4(1)
M = −0(y) − 5(1 − y) + 2(1 − y) + 5(1 + y) = 2 + 8 y(2)
where y is the mole fraction of Zn2+ ions. The theoretical value of this magnetization was inconsistent with the magnetization data which indicates a decreasing trend with increasing Zn content. However, it has been reported that the magnetization of NiZn ferrite decreases as the Zn content increases above 0.5 mole fraction in NiZn ferrite [31]. At high levels of zinc substitution, Fe3+ ions in the tetragonal sites were so diluted that super-exchange interaction between tetrahedral and octahedral sites was lost and the saturation magnetization dropped. The Curie temperature declines abruptly and eventually drops below room temperature with increasing Zn content, so that the magnetic properties disappear at this temperature.Figure 8a–c shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) samples sintered at 1250 °C. There are no second phases in these X-ray diffraction patterns, which means that the sintered samples have the same pure spinel structure regardless of their composition.
Figure 9a–c displays FE-SEM images of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) sintered at 1250 °C. Note that the microstructures become denser with an increasing Zn concentration in Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 ferrite. This behavior is consistent with the study that Zn ions not only lower the sintering temperature, but also play a crucial role in increasing the sintering density. Meanwhile, it is interesting to note that although the particle size is somewhat uniform with about 5 µm, the particle shape is faceted.
Figure 10a,b shows the real and imaginary parts of the magnetic permeability of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) toroidal samples in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 1 GHz. It is clear from the Figure 10 that the real permeability (μ′) at 5 MHz increases monotonically from μ′ = 106 to 217 with increasing Zn content from x = 0.5 to 0.7 in of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7). The value of μ′ for all three toroid samples remains constant up to 10 MHz and increases slightly with further increase in frequency.
The imaginary part of permeability (μ″) increases with increase in frequency and a broad maximum is observed at 20 MHz, where μ′ decreases rapidly. This characteristic is a consequence of domain wall resonance, which consists of relaxation and resonance type dispersions. Hence, in the low frequency domain, the complex permeability spectrum of domain wall motion can be treated as the superposition of resonance and relaxation dispersion [30]. The broad maximum in μ″ is the result of the overlapping of the domain wall motion (DWM) resonance and spin resonance [32,33,34,35]. The contributions of domain wall motion on the complex permeability spectrum decreases gradually with increasing frequency, and only the spin rotational component becomes dominant at higher frequency [36]. At frequencies below 500 kHz, the chief magnetizing mechanism of ferrite is DMW [37], while the domain wall resonance happens in the range from 1 to 100 MHz and rotational resonance occurs above 1 GHz [32,33].
The frequency dependence of the permeability of ferrite samples is connected to two types of magnetization mechanisms: domain wall motion and spin rotation, as shown below.
(3)
(4)
(5)
where χdw is the domain wall susceptibility, χsp is the intrinsic rotational susceptibility, Ku is the anisotropy constant, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, Ms is the saturation magnetization, and D is the grain diameter. With increasing Zn content, μ′ of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) increases, while the cut-off frequency decreases. Real part of permeability (μ′) is depends on various parameters such as stoichiometry, grain size, composition, porosity, impurity levels, saturation magnetization, magnetostriction, and crystal anisotropy [37]. Higher permeabilities are favored by large grain size, low porosity, high saturation magnetization, low crystalline anisotropy, low magnetostriction and high purity. In particular, the real part of permeability strongly depends on grain size.As Zn ion increases, the crystalline anisotropy is decreased, but permeability is increased as shown in Table 1. Here, the crystalline anisotropy constant K1 was calculated using the following relation [38] expressed as K1 = MsHc/0.96, where Ms is the saturation magnetization and Hc is the coercivity. The initial permeability varies inversely with magneto-crystalline anisotropy constant, but proportional to grain size according to the relationship [39] represented by μi′ = MsD/K1 where D is the average grain size. Thus, the formula μi′ = 0.96D/Hc is obtained, which means that as the Zn concentration increases, the increase in permeability (μ′) is related to increased grain size and reduced coercivity. This corresponds to the results shown in Table 1. In other words, an increase in μ′ as the Zn concentration increases can be attributed to an increase in the domain wall mobility promoted by the larger grains, as well as lower crystalline anisotropy according to Equations (1) and (2).
4. Conclusions
Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by a thermal decomposition method and they were identified as pure spinel ferrite structures by X-ray diffraction analysis. The synthesized ferrite nanoparticles were calculated to be 46–51 nm in diameter by the Scherrer equation, which was consistent with the particle size of about 50 nm observed from FE-SEM images. The lattice parameters of ferrite nanoparticles monotonically increased as the Zn content increased. The synthesized ferrite nanoparticles showed relatively high saturation magnetization values of 71–83 emu/g depending on their composition. Toroidal samples were prepared by sintering ferrite nanoparticles at 125 °C, and they exhibited faceted grain morphology in FE-SEM images with a grain size of about 5 µm. The real magnetic permeability (μ′) of the toroidal sample measured at 5 MHz increased with increasing Zn content, showing μ′ = 217 for x = 0.7. The cutoff frequency of the ferrite toroidal sample was about 20 MHz, which seemed to be associated with domain wall resonance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.C. (Moonhee Choi); methodology, J.H.; validation, J.H.; formal analysis, H.-S.S.; investigation, H.-S.S.; writing—original draft preparation M.C. (MyoungPyo Chun); writing—review and editing, B.-K.J. and M.C. (MyoungPyo Chun). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation (20010938, Development of 630 V high capacity MLCC array module for power train), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Sejong City, Korea).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures and Table
Figure 1. The spinel structure of ferrites is shown indicating the tetrahedral and octahedral sites.
Figure 2. Experimental procedure for synthesizing Ni1−xZn1−xFe2O4 (x = 0.3, 0.4, 0.5) ferrite nanoparticles.
Figure 3. (a–c) X-ray diffraction patterns of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.3, 0.4, 0.5) nanoparticles of the synthesized samples: (a) x = 0.3, (b) x = 0.4, and (c) x = 0.5.
Figure 4. The dependence of the lattice parameters of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) ferrite nanoparticles on the Zn concentration.
Figure 5. The dependence of the crystallite size of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) ferrite nanoparticles on the Zn concentration.
Figure 6. Hysteresis curves of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) ferrite nanoparticles.
Figure 7. FE-SEM image of synthesized Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nanoparticles. (a) x = 0.5 (b) x = 0.6, and (c) x = 0.7.
Figure 8. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) samples sintered at 1250 °C: (a) x = 0.5, (b) x = 0.6, and (c) x = 0.7.
Figure 9. FE-SEM images of the Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) samples sintered at 1250 °C: (a) x = 0.5, (b) x = 0.6, and (c) x = 0.7.
Figure 10. Real part (a), and imaginary part (b) of the magnetic permeability of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) toroidal samples in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 1 GHz.
Properties of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) powder and toroidal samples.
Sample |
Saturation |
Lattice Parameter |
Crystallite |
Permeability |
Coercivity Hc (Oe) | Anisotropic Constant K1 (erg/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 | 84.44 | 8.340 | 49 | 106 | 18.54 | 1631 |
Ni0.4Zn0.6Fe2O4 | 83.97 | 8.346 | 51 | 150 | 17.56 | 1536 |
Ni0.3Zn0.7Fe2O4 | 71.84 | 8.358 | 46 | 217 | 16.48 | 1233 |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) nanoparticles were synthesized by a thermal decomposition method. The synthesized particles were identified as pure spinel ferrite structures by X-ray diffraction analysis, and they were calculated to be 46–51 nm in diameter by the Scherrer equation, depending on the composition. In the FE-SEM image, the ferrite nanoparticles have spherical shapes with slight agglomeration, and the particle size is about 50 nm, which was consistent with the value obtained by the Scherrer equation. The lattice parameter of the ferrite nanoparticles monotonically increased from 8.34 to 8.358 Å as the Zn concentration increased from 0.5 to 0.7. Initially, the saturation magnetization value slowly decreases from 81.44 to 83.97 emu/g, then quickly decreases to 71.84 emu/g as the zinc content increases from x = 0.5, through 0.6, to 0.7. Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 toroidal samples were prepared by sintering ferrite nanoparticles at 1250 °C and exhibited faceted grain morphologies in the FE-SEM images with their grain sizes being around 5 µm regardless of the Zinc content. The real magnetic permeability (μ′) of the toroidal samples measured at 5 MHz was monotonically increased from 106, through 150, to 217 with increasing the Zinc content from x = 0.5, through 0.6, to 0.7. The cutoff frequency of the ferrite toroidal samples was estimated to be about 20 MHz from the broad maximum point in the plot of imaginary magnetic permeability (μ″) vs. frequencies, which seemed to be associated with domain wall resonance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Electronic Convergence Materials Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 660-031, Korea;
2 Electronic Convergence Materials Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 660-031, Korea;
3 Display and Nanosystem Laboratory, School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 13701, Korea