Content area
Full Text
IN THE STORY “Advertising for a Wife,” published in the working-class magazine Bow Bells in 1895, a young woman named Emma is urged by her father, Mr. Glue, to answer a matrimonial advertisement. This is a highly unusual scenario, given that advertising was thought of as a disreputable way to find a spouse, especially for women. But Mr. Glue is a lawyer who hopes to catch the man who placed the ad in order to prosecute him for debt. Glue, like Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, uses the daily newspaper advertisements to hunt down criminals and solve crimes. As Matthew Rubery points out,
few readers were more skilled in the use of baited advertisements than Sherlock Holmes, whose book of clippings … served as an informal archive in solving numerous cases since lawbreakers were among the most habitual employers of this clandestine means of communication. The criminal underworld investigated by Holmes was found in the most unlikely of hiding places—the newspaper’s front page.
(57)
Mr. Glue “looked to derive more or less of personal advantage” from reading the daily advertisements; “indeed since he had hit on this expedient, the second column of the Times had proved a little fortune to him” (566). In this case, he wants his daughter to lure the debtor—who is using the ad to attract a wealthy wife—into his trap. The fact that Glue would put Emma in such a compromising position is suspect enough, but he also lies to her about his motives. He suggests that “it would serve the coxcomb right to send him on a fool’s errand” and promises her a new guitar if she agrees to “put the gentleman’s sincerity to the test” (566). However, the plan backfires when Emma’s maid, Lucy, overhears a conversation that reveals the true identity of the advertiser and Glue’s self-interested reason for involving his daughter.
The advertiser happens to be none other than Captain Frederick Fitz-Mortimer, the man with whom Emma fell in love during a party on the Isle of Wight the previous summer. Emma is angry with her father for duping her, but also filled with “shame at the knowledge that Fitz-Mortimer, of whom she had thought so highly, having had recourse to such a disgraceful expedient as advertising...