It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This dissertation studies the institutions and politics in China’s electricity reform. It consists of three free-standing papers, each of which investigates an important subject matter and contributes meaningfully to the current literature. The first paper studies China’s electricity market design and regulatory landscape, and it focuses on the political economy aspect. The second paper studies China’s wind energy integration and curtailment, and it focuses on the roles of institutions. The third paper studies the mechanisms of China’s wholesale generation competition, and it focuses on how institutions and politics affect economic outcomes.
Meanwhile, the three papers are built on the same premise: institutions and politics play a much bigger role in China’s electricity reform than commonly depicted by the literature. The first paper interprets China’s electricity reform as the party-state’s bidding to deliver better economic, social, and environmental outcomes while managing threats to its own power and legitimacy. It is an excellent showcase of why the popular rhetoric “economic efficiency is constrained by politics” is correct but also incomplete. The second paper uses complex chains of causality to explain why the same technical problem can have very different root causes in two institutionally distinct countries. It demonstrates that even for a highly technical problem like wind power curtailment, a sufficient understanding of its institutional background is valuable for developing the right policy response. The third paper explicitly incorporates institutional and political factors into the empirical analysis of economic outcomes. It shows that not only do these factors carry explanation power, but they also speak to the inevitable tradeoffs between economic and political objectives in China’s electricity reform.
Moreover, the three papers arrive at the same conclusion: the “paradoxes” in China’s electricity industry result from the Chinese leaders’ unwavering commitment and persistent efforts to continuously improve the welfare of its citizens while maintaining the party’s monopoly over state power. Ultimately, this dissertation uses China’s electricity reform as a case study to elaborate the dynamic relationship between economic progress and authoritarian politics. The two will, this dissertation argues, continue to generate both synergies and conflicts for China in the foreseeable future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer