Little has been reported regarding pathological findings on renal cell carcinomas (RCC) that have shown radiological response to nivolumab treatment. Hagimoto et al. reported a case of metastatic RCC (mRCC) who achieved disease‐free status by nivolumab and surgical removal of the residual lesion.1 Of note, nivolumab achieved radiological partial response (PR) and pathological complete response (CR) in the right adrenal metastasis, which was progressive after multiple drug regimens including interferon and kinase inhibitors. According to the authors only four cases have been reported as RCC cases achieving pathological CR by nivolumab.
According to updated follow up data,2 only 4 (1%) of the 410 patients of the nivolumab arm in CheckMate 025 trial achieved radiological CR, while 90 (22%) showed radiological PR. Of the 90, 31 (34%) was reported to remain off treatment. Additionally, in 65 patients who initially assigned to the everolimus arm and subsequently received the crossover nivolumab treatment, five achieved radiological response (one CR and four PRs) and two of them remained off treatment. Although a substantial part of those achieving durable, off‐treatment disease control may have no residual viable cells, but the frequency is unknown due to low rate of surgical removal of those lesions. Moreover whether or not surgical resection is beneficial for patients who achieved radiological response is a matter of different dimension.
We will have an increasing number of cases of mRCC with durable radiological response to systemic immunological treatment since we have currently more intensified treatment for mRCC including nivolumab plus ipilimumab, avelumab plus axitinib, and pembrolizumab axtinib. Ideally, metastasectomy with curable intent should be considered for those with originally oligometastatic (low metastatic burden) disease when the surgery is technically feasible and expectedly achieves radiologically disease‐free status.3 Accumulation of long‐term follow‐up data with or without metastasectomy after radiological response by systemic immunological treatment will provide useful information for the indication of surgical removal of residual lesions in the future.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.