It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The purpose of this comparative case study (Bartlett & Vavrus, 2017) was to gain insights into and greater understanding of the perceived impacts of the policy and practice of educational interpreters on the school engagement experiences of American deaf signing youth. This study examined educational policy as practice from multiple levels of analysis; vertical, horizontal, and transversal, by tracing the line of inquiry in these guiding questions. At the macro-level: What is the state level policy discourse informing the practice of educational interpreting; including qualifications, hiring practices, supervision of the interpreter? At the meso-level: How do the local education agencies appropriate the provision of educational interpreters, including educational team decisions related to the individualized educational program? At the micro-level: How do deaf signing youth and their parents experience educational engagement in mediated educational settings?
A multimethod approach to data gathering lead to a review of archives, inventory of documents, public records, observations, and interviews to trace the actor networks across scales from macro to micro. Educational interpreters in the study setting are required to meet minimum performance standards but are not included in the student’s Individualized Education Program as policy requires. Through interviews and observations of three deaf of deaf high school students who experience both direct and mediated instruction, the perceptions of school engagement were examined. Deaf student participants in this study exhibit a resigned, fatalistic, ‘it is, what it is’ perspective on the educational interpreting services they receive in their mainstream classes; however, choose to remain in the setting in order to be exposed to the hearing world. Findings indicate that the policy and practice of educational interpreters does not support the full educational engagement of signing deaf students in mediated classrooms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
Supplemental files
Document includes 1 supplemental file(s).
Special programs or plug-ins may be required to view some files.
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as a part of a dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without any warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the content, format or impact of the supplemental file(s) on your system. In some cases, the file type may be unknown or may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of original materials contained in a supplemental files is retained by the author and your access to the supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Downloading time depends on the size of the file(s) that you are downloading. System may take some time to download them.Please be patient.