It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The genetics of phenotypic responses to changing environments remains elusive. Using whole-genome quantitative gene expression as a model, here we study how the genetic architecture of regulatory variation in gene expression changed in a population of fully sequenced inbred Drosophila melanogaster strains when flies developed in different environments (25 °C and 18 °C). We find a substantial fraction of the transcriptome exhibited genotype by environment interaction, implicating environmentally plastic genetic architecture of gene expression. Genetic variance in expression increases at 18 °C relative to 25 °C for most genes that have a change in genetic variance. Although the majority of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) for the gene expression traits in the two environments are shared and have similar effects, analysis of the environment-specific eQTLs reveals enrichment of binding sites for two transcription factors. Finally, although genotype by environment interaction in gene expression could potentially disrupt genetic networks, the co-expression networks are highly conserved across environments. Genes with higher network connectivity are under stronger stabilizing selection, suggesting that stabilizing selection on expression plays an important role in promoting network robustness.
Huang et al. show that developing under different temperatures changes the genetic architecture of regulatory variation in Drosophila melanogaster gene expression yet the co-expression network remains robust. Data suggest that stabilizing selection on gene expression may promote co-expression network robustness.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Program in Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074); Michigan State University, Department of Animal Science, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2150 1785)
2 W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Program in Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074); North Carolina State University, Center for Integrated Fungal Research and Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074)
3 W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Program in Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074); Clemson University, Clemson Center for Human Genetics, Greenwood, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280)