It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Carabids are generalist predators that contribute to the agricultural ecosystem service of seedbank regulation via weed seed predation. To facilitate adoption of this ecosystem services by farmers, knowledge of weed seed predation and the resilience of seedbank regulation with co-varying availability of alternative prey is crucial. Using assessments of the seedbank and predation on seed cards in 57 cereal fields across Europe, we demonstrate a regulatory effect on the soil seedbank, at a continental scale, by groups formed of omnivore, seed-eating (granivore + omnivore) and all species of carabids just prior to the crop-harvest. Regulation was associated with a positive relationship between the activity-density of carabids and seed predation, as measured on seed cards. We found that per capita seed consumption on the cards co-varied negatively with the biomass of alternative prey, i.e. Aphididae, Collembola and total alternative prey biomass. Our results underline the importance of weed seedbank regulation by carabids, across geographically significant scales, and indicate that the effectiveness of this biocontrol may depend on the availability of alternative prey that disrupt the weed seed predation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Dijon Cedex, France (GRID:grid.493090.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6615)
2 University of Innsbruck, Mountain Agriculture Research Unit, Institute of Ecology, Innsbruck, Austria (GRID:grid.5771.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8122)
3 Crop Research Institute, Functional Diversity in Agro-Ecosystems, Praha 6, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.417626.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 627X); Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)
4 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.6341.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 8578 2742)
5 Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Dijon Cedex, France (GRID:grid.493090.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6615); University of Innsbruck, Mountain Agriculture Research Unit, Institute of Ecology, Innsbruck, Austria (GRID:grid.5771.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8122)
6 Crop Research Institute, Functional Diversity in Agro-Ecosystems, Praha 6, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.417626.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 627X)




