It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fruit firmness is a target trait in tomato breeding because it facilitates transportation and storage. However, it is also a complex trait and uncovering the molecular genetic mechanisms controlling fruit firmness has proven challenging. Here, we report the map-based cloning and functional characterization of qFIRM SKIN 1 (qFIS1), a major quantitative trait locus that partially determines the difference in compression resistance between cultivated and wild tomato accessions. FIS1 encodes a GA2-oxidase, and its mutation leads to increased bioactive gibberellin content, enhanced cutin and wax biosynthesis, and increased fruit firmness and shelf life. Importantly, FIS1 has no unfavorable effect on fruit weight or taste, making it an ideal target for breeders. Our study demonstrates that FIS1 mediates gibberellin catabolism and regulates fruit firmness, and it offers a potential strategy for tomato breeders to produce firmer fruit.
Fruit firmness is an important target for breeders and a key determinant of shelf life for many fruits. Here the authors show that mutating tomato FIS1, a GA2-oxidase, increases the concentration of bioactive gibberellins, enhances cutin and wax biosynthesis and increases fruit firmness.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410727.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 1937); Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410727.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 1937)
2 Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Forest Cultivation, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.443483.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9152 7385)
3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
4 Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, Vegetable Research Institute, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.454840.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0017 5204)
5 University of Connecticut, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, Storrs, USA (GRID:grid.63054.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0860 4915)