It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
Large-scale population screening can provide insights to levels of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, the authors report a citywide screening of ~10,000,000 residents of Wuhan and show that SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223)
2 University of East Anglia, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwich, UK (GRID:grid.8273.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1092 7967)
3 Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.508241.a)
4 Wuhan Centre for Clinical Laboratory, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.508241.a)
5 Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Economics and Management, Nanchang, China (GRID:grid.411864.e)
6 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.33199.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7223)
7 La Trobe University, Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1018.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 0938); University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
8 School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (GRID:grid.207374.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2189 3846)
9 The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Department of Emergency, Hainan Clinical Research Centre for Acute and Critical Diseases, Haikou, China (GRID:grid.443397.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7493)