It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
After bacterial cell division, the daughter cells are still covalently interlinked by the peptidoglycan network which is resolved by specific hydrolases (autolysins) to release the daughter cells. In staphylococci, the major autolysin (Atl) with its two domain enzymes, N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanine amidase (AmiA) and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (GlcA), resolves the peptidoglycan to release the daughter cells. Internal deletions in each of the enzyme domains revealed defined morphological alterations such as cell cluster formation in ΔamiA, ΔglcA and Δatl, and asymmetric cell division in the ΔglcA. A most important finding was that GlcA activity requires the prior removal of the stem peptide by AmiA for its activity thus the naked glycan strand is its substrate. Furthermore, GlcA is not an endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase but an exo-enzyme that cuts the glycan backbone to disaccharides independent of its O-acetylation modification. Our results shed new light into the sequential peptidoglycan hydrolysis by AmiA and GlcA during cell division in staphylococci.
Nega et al. shed light on the interplay of the two domain enzymes of the major autolysin, AmiA and GlcA, in S. aureus for peptidoglycan hydrolysis during bacterial cell division. They show that GlcA requires the prior removal of the stem peptide by AmiA for its activity and that GlcA is not an endo-enzyme as previously thought, but an exo-enzyme that chops down the glycan backbone to disaccharides independent of its O-acetylation modification.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Tübingen, Microbial Genetics, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine Tübingen (IMIT), Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447)
2 University of Tübingen, Microbial Genetics, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine Tübingen (IMIT), Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447); Departamento de Química Biológica FCEyN-UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina (GRID:grid.7345.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0056 1981)
3 Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.419495.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1014 8330)
4 University of Tübingen, Zentrum für Molekularbiologie der Pflanzen (ZMBP), Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447)