It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in patients with heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) have not been completely characterized. The Myocardial‐IRON trial was a double‐blind, randomized trial that evaluated myocardial iron repletion following FCM vs. placebo in 53 patients with HF and ID. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated whether treatment with FCM was associated with cardiac magnetic resonance changes in left and right ventricular function (LVEF and RVEF, respectively) at different points of systolic dysfunction.
Methods and results
We included patients from the Myocardial‐IRON trial with left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD and RVSD, respectively) at enrolment. Linear mixed regression models were used to evaluate changes at 7 and 30 days on LVEF and RVEF at cardiac magnetic resonance. At enrolment, 27 (50.9%) and 38 (71.7%) patients had LVEF < 40% (LVSD1) or <45% (LVSD2), respectively, and 10 (18.9%) and 17 (32.1%) patients had RVEF < 45% (RVSD1) or <51% in women and <52% in men (RVSD2), respectively. Treatment with FCM was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF at 30 days (LVSD1: Δ2.3%, P < 0.001; LVSD2: Δ4.1, P = 0.014). FCM was also associated with a significant and early improvement in RVEF at 7 days (RVSD1: Δ6.9%, P = 0.003; RVSD2: Δ3.2%, P = 0.003) that persisted at 30 days (RVSD1: Δ8.1%, P < 0.001; RVSD2: Δ4.7%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
In patients with HF and systolic dysfunction with ID, FCM was associated with short‐term improvement in LVEF and, especially, in RVEF.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universidad de Valencia, INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; CIBER Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain
2 Cardiology Department, Hospital de Manises, Valencia, Spain
3 Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
4 Cardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
5 Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
6 Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, ERESA‐Ascires Biomedical Group, Valencia, Spain
7 CIBER Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department and Heart Failure Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain





