Abstract
Objectives
The present study investigated the reliability and validity of a newly developed Vietnamese version of the 9‐item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES‐9‐V) in a sample of hospital nurses in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Methods
The UWES‐9 was translated into Vietnamese following a standard procedure. A survey was conducted of 949 registered nurses in a large tertiary general hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, in 2018, using a self‐administered questionnaire including the Vietnamese UWES‐9, other scales measuring health status, work performance, job demand, job control, and workplace social support, and questions pertaining to demographic variables. Cronbach’s alpha and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess reliability. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess factorial validity. Convergent validity was tested based on associations between the UWES‐9‐V and subscales and other scales.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the UWES‐9‐V and the Vigor, Absorption, and Dedication subscales were 0.93, 0.86, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively. ICC of the UWES‐9‐V in a subsample after 3 months was 0.48. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated an acceptable fit of both one‐factor and three‐factor structures, with the three‐factor model having the better fit. The UWES‐9‐V and its subscales correlated with depression, anxiety and stress, health‐related quality of life and health condition, job performance, and psychosocial work environment.
Conclusions
The study findings suggest that the UWES‐9‐V is a reliable and valid instrument to measure work engagement among hospital nurses in Vietnam, a low‐ and middle‐income country. Future studies should confirm the validity and reliability of the UWES‐9‐V among various occupations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Watanabe, Kazuhiro 2
; Imamura, Kotaro 2 ; Huong Thanh Nguyen 3
; Sasaki, Natsu 2 ; Kuribayashi, Kazuto 4 ; Sakuraya, Asuka 5 ; Nga Thi Nguyen 3 ; Bui, Thu Minh 6 ; Nguyen, Quynh Thuy 1 ; Truong, Tien Quang 3 ; Giang Thi Huong Nguyen 6 ; Minas, Harry 7
; Tsustumi, Akizumi 8
; Shimazu, Akihito 9
; Kawakami, Norito 2
1 Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Environmental and Occupational Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
2 Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
3 Faculty of Social Sciences – Behavior and Health Education, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
4 Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
5 Department of Public Health, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
6 Nursing Office, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
7 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
8 Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
9 Faculty of Policy Management, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan





