It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lack of standardization and unblinding threaten the research of mechanisms involved in expectancy effects on pain. We evaluated a computer-controlled virtual experimenter (VEx) to avoid these issues. Fifty-four subjects underwent a baseline-retest heat pain protocol. Between sessions, they received an expectancy manipulation (placebo or no-treatment) delivered by VEx or text-only control condition. The VEx provided standardized “social” interaction with the subjects. Pain ratings and psychological state/trait measures were recorded. We found an interaction of expectancy and delivery on pain improvement following the intervention. In the text conditions, placebo was followed by lower pain, whereas in the VEx conditions, placebo and no-treatment were followed by a comparable pain decrease. Secondary analyses indicated that this interaction was mirrored by decreases of negative mood and anxiety. Furthermore, changes in continuous pain were moderated by expectation of pain relief. However, retrospective pain ratings show an effect of expectancy but not of delivery. We conclude that we successfully applied an automated protocol for inducing expectancy effects on pain. The effect of the VEx regardless of treatment may be due to interactions of attention allocation and locus of control. This points to the diversity of expectancy mechanisms, and has implications for research and computer-based treatment applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Affective Neuroscience Group, Department of Systems Neuroscience, Hamburg, Germany (GRID:grid.13648.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 3484)
2 Clemson University, Department of Psychology, Clemson, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280)
3 Clemson University, Division of Human Centered Computing, School of Computing, Clemson, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280)
4 Clemson University, Department of Psychology, Clemson, USA (GRID:grid.26090.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0665 0280); North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Division of Research and Economic Development, Greensboro, USA (GRID:grid.261037.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0287 4439)