It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Hydrocarbon expulsion occurs only when pore fluid pressure due to hydrocarbon generation in source rock exceeds the force against migration in the adjacent carrier beds. Taking the Middle–Upper Ordovician carbonate source rock of Tarim Basin in China as an example, this paper proposes a method that identifies effective carbonate source rock based on the principles of mass balance. Data from the Well YW2 indicate that the Middle Ordovician Yijianfang Formation contains effective carbonate source rocks with low present-day TOC. Geological and geochemical analysis suggests that the hydrocarbons in the carbonate interval are likely self-generated and retained. Regular steranes from GC–MS analysis of oil extracts in this interval display similar features to those of the crude oil samples in Tabei area, indicating that the crude oil probably was migrated from the effective source rocks. By applying to other wells in the basin, the identified effective carbonate source rocks and non-source rock carbonates can be effectively identified and consistent with the actual exploration results, validating the method. Considering the contribution from the identified effective source rocks with low present-day TOC (TOCpd) is considered, the long-standing puzzle between the proved 3P oil reserves and estimated resources in the basin can be reasonably explained.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 China University of Petroleum, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174); China University of Petroleum, Beijing Key Laboratory of Optical Detection Technology for Oil and Gas, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174)
2 China University of Petroleum, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174); China University of Petroleum, College of Geoscience, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174)
3 Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary, Canada (GRID:grid.470085.e)
4 PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Renqiu, China (GRID:grid.464414.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 2021)
5 China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.162107.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 409X)