Introduction
People show different patterns of behavior depending on whether they succeer fail pursuing their long-term goals. Whereas some people are steadfast in their pursuit of such goals, sometimes over years or decades, other people abandon pursuit in the face of significant challenges to the attainment of such goals (Arco-Tirado et al., 2018). Recent research findings have spurred the evidence of the so-called non-cognitive abilities as predictors of individual performance and productivity in different life domains (Duckworth & Yeager, 2015; García, 2014). A pleiaf terms like qualities, traits, non-cognitive competencies, soft skills, or life skills are interchangeably used as predictors of psychological, social, economic, and physical wellbeing (Almlund et al., 2011; Borghans et al., 2008; Heckman & Kautz, 2012; Heckman et al., 2006; Méndez & Zamarro, 2015).
The variability of the terms mentioned above can be the result of the lack of a shareefinition of the “non-cognitive skills” concept, including measurement problems (Duckworth & Yeager, 2015; Fernández-Martín et al., 2018; García, 2014). In this view, the most common approach among different authors refer to this concept as a pattern of thought, feelings, anehaviors (Borghans et al., 2008). With this term we also refer tiverse attitudes, personality characteristics, anehaviors including self-perceptions (i.e., self-concept and self-efficacy), motivation, self-control, metacognitive strategies, social competencies (i.e., social aneadership skills), resilience, creativity, and perseverance (i.e., engagement and grit) (García, 2014; Gutman & Schoon, 2013).
Within the Big Five taxonomy of personality traits, grit shares content with the conscientiousness domain (Rimfeld et al., 2016) as reflected in its conceptual relatedness to severaf the conscientiousness facets – orderliness, dependability, self-control, and industriousness (Duckworth & Eskreis-Winkler, 2015). Indeed, grit is viewey some personality theorists as falling with the broad family of conscientiousness constructs (Roberts et al., 2014). Yet, despite its conceptual similarity to facets of conscientiousness, none of the conscientiousness facets fully captures the combination of passion and perseverance that characterizes grit (Arco-Tirado et al., 2018). In particular, the sustained interest in important long-term goals, a core feature of grit, is not evident in conscientiousness or its facets (Sartori et al., 2017). Thus, although the conceptuaverlap between the broad conscientiousness domain and the relative narrow grit trait is substantial – conceptually speaking, grit includes a specific and unique focus on the pursuit of long-term, higher-order goals (Arco-Tirado et al., 2018).
Grit was initially measured with the Original Grit Scale (Grit-O) developey Duckworth et al. (2007) aiming to capture the characteristic attitudes anehaviours of high-performing individuals, albeit without associating them with a specific domain in life. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a structural model with two first-order factors – each made up of six items – although with fit indices with room for improvement. Thus, two years later Duckworth and Quinn (2009) developed and validated a more efficient measurement of the grit construct, the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). The resulting Grit-S scale (8 items) was built with a larger sample and showeetter psychometric properties than the Grit-O scale (12 items), revealing fairly acceptable fit indexes (i.e., RMSEA = .076 and CFI = .96), an internal consistency of .82, .77, and .70, respectively, a test-retest reliability (12 months) stability over time, r = .68, and evidence of the predictive validity of the Grit-S scale, including the differential for each factor, on psychological and educational variables such as educationaevel and a lower number of degree changes in adults (see Duckworth and Quinn, 2009 for more details). Additionally, the Grit-S scale (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009) has alseen adapted and validated tther contexts, like Turkish (Akın et al., 2011) and Japanese (Nishikawa et al., 2015).
The predictive validity of grit is evident from a number of studies focusen this non-cognitive ability yielding prospective evidences that higher scores on grit predict multiple variables, such as: (a) grade point average and hours spent watching television – inversely –, without controlling for other variables, and educational attainment and fewer career changes in adults and retention for West Point cadets, controlling for conscientiousness anther Big Five inventory factors (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009); (b) higher retention rates among military cadets after the first summer of training (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009); (c) higher teacher retention and effectiveness in low-income schooistricts (Eskreis-Winkler, Shulman, & Duckworth, 2014; Robertson-Kraft & Duckworth, 2014); (d) higher labor stability and higher professional efficacy (Duckworth et al., 2009; Eskreis-Winkler, Shulman, Beal et al., 2014); (e) longer marriage – only for men – (Eskreis-Winkler, Shulman, Beal et al., 2014); and (f) higher life expectancy (Kim & Lee, 2015). Therefore, the widespread enthusiasm for grit in the last decade is not strange, as a potentially novel predictor aneterminant of performance.
Indeed, Duckworth et al. (2007) noted that grit accounted for an average of 4% of the variance in success outcomes, which corresponds to a correlation of r = .20, or what is called a “small-to-medium” effect. Other authors like Sheldon et al. (2015) compared grit to nine other positive personality characteristics in a year-long study of goal attainment and found that grit was the most reliable predictor of achieving personally meaningful goals over that period. These findings suggest that grit is an important determinant of success, although not the only one. In another publication by Duckworth et al. (2015) these authors identify many other factors, including opportunity, talent, luck, as well as other personality characteristics like curiosity, that also influence achievement outcomes. Additionally, if we put in perspective the magnitude of the grit effect found, as other authors like Roberts et al. (2007) point, we realize the importance and capacity of grit as a single characteristic to predict objective outcomes, since those results do not differ from those found related tther personality traits.
From the intervention and educational perspective, the analysis of grit as an outcome turns out te as necessary and important as grit as a predictor. The scarcity of prediction research on grit is clearly noticeable in the literature and it is probably due to the fact that researchers are more interested in studying the predictive performance of different measures rather than the reverse approach. Thus, although grit as an outcome appears linked to educational (e.g., Egalite et al., 2016; Lyon, 2014), socio-demographics (e.g., Johnson, 2014), professional (e.g., Clark, 2016), or personal factors (e.g., Incantalupo-Kuhner, 2015) in the literature, no previous studies have analyzed systematically the quality of the evidences supporting those prospective results affecting our current knowledge on how grit develops.
Basen the fact that studies on grit have experienced a geometric growth in the last ten years, and the number of authors claiming for the role of grit as both predictor anutcome of further personal, professional, and/or educationaevelopment, it was necessary to conduct a systematic review and/or meta-analysis on grit basen international high-quality standards and protocols, because, systematic reviews are indispensable components in the chain of scientific information and key tools for evidence-based (Ioannidis, 2016). Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the results available on grit as predictor of educational, professional, and personal success as outcomes, as well as grit as outcome of educational, professional, and personal factors as predictors, following international high-quality standards for systematic reviews (i.e., The Campbell Collaboration, 2015), and the research questions to answer are: (1) what are the salient features of grit research?;, (2) what are the evidences accounting for grit as predictor in different domains of success?;, (3) what are the evidences accounting for grit as outcome?;, and (4) what direction should research on grit take to strenthening future causal research?;
Method
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The review team developed a systematic review protocol following Campbell Systematic Reviews: Policies and Guidelines (The Campbell Collaboration, 2015). The access to this protocol is available upon request to the review team.
The operational characteristics of independent (predictor) anependent (outcome) variable(s) were established as follows.
Grit (either as a predictor or outcome): “perseverance and passion for long-term goals” (Duckworth, 2006, p. 71). The measurement of grit is carrieut via: (a) the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S) (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009), and (b) any of the translated versions of this versions in other languages, for example, Japanese (Nishikawa et al., 2015), Filipino (Datu et al., 2016), and Turkish (Akın et al., 2011). Grit-S scale was selecteecause of the improved psychometric properties compared to previous versions (i.e., Grit-O) (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009) and therefore to increase results comparability.
Educational success (either as a predictor or outcome): “accomplishment of widely valued goals” (Duckworth et al., 2007, p. 1087) as school/academic performance (i.e., dropout – as the reverse of retention –, retention, grade point average – GPA –, achievement test scores, repetition – reversed –, and graduation) and satisfaction, measured through an standardized and/or objective quantitative procedure, usually a questionnaire or a structured interview.
Professional success (either as a predictor or outcome): “accomplishment of widely valued goals” (Duckworth et al., 2007, p. 1087) as performance (e.g., assigned a ranking to each teacher basen the academic gains of their students over the course of the academic year) (Duckworth et al., 2009), retention (Eskreis-Winkler, Shulman, Beal et al., 2014), and satisfaction, measured through standardizer objective quantitative procedure, usually a questionnaire or a structured interview.
Personal success (either as a predictor or outcome): “accomplishment of widely valued goals” (Duckworth et al., 2007, p. 1087) as psychological well-being (e.g., optimal psychological functioning and experience) and satisfaction (e.g., how happy they feel with their life basen a person’s own criteria of what makes them satisfied) (Tiittanen, 2014), measured through standardized and/or objective quantitative procedure, usually a questionnaire or a structured interview.
There was not a particular eligible participant population for this research study.
The eligible research designs for this research study were: pre-experimental, experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational and ex post facto, following the classification of Campbell and Stanley (1963).
The time period covered in this research study extends from 2006, when Duckworth defended her dissertation on grit, onwards until 2017.
No geographical and/or cultural restrictions were included except for the language of publication, which were English and Spanish.
Search Strategies
The literature search was basen a variety of sources in order to ensure that published and unpublished studies (“grey literature”) relevant to the review questions were included in the search process. The search process included a primary search, searching of databases, and a complementary search, searching other resources and unstructured searching of relevant websites, literature snowballing, and contacting experts. The review team used RefWorks to manage anocument this process. This search was conducteuring September 2017.
The primary search of databases included a wide range of platform and electronic databases: Proquest, OvidSP, EBSCOHOST, Wef Science, Scopus, The online platform for Taylor & Francis, and specializeatabases (i.e., Research for Development, British Library for Development Studies, Science Direct, Springer Link, PubPsych, Wiley Online Library, Center for Longitudinal Studies, REDINED, REDUC, ISOC, Redalyc, anialnet).
The primary search was supplementey a complementary search to identify further studies for inclusion: (a) reference lists of included studies and reference lists of relevant reviews were searched, (b) a general web search was conducted using Google Scholar to identify potential unpublished studies, (c) personal contacts with national and international researchers were made to identify unpublished reports anngoing studies, (d) conference proceedings (i.e., Ovid MedlineR In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Conference Papers Index, Scopus, Wef Science, and The Conference Collection), (e) dissertations and theses databases (i.e., Networkeigitaibrary of Theses anissertations, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Electronic Theses Online Service, The Australian Digital Theses, and TESEO), (f) open access (i.e., OpenGrey EAGLE, GreyNet International-Grey Literature Network Service, National Technical Information Service, OpenSIGLE, Directory of Open Access Repositories, Ovid HealthSTAR Database, COPAC, and Urbadisc), (g) ongoing research (i.e., CORDIS, Regaratabase of Economic and Social Research Council, Centre for Review anissemination, NBER Working Papers, The Campbell Collaboration, and RePEc), and (h) relevant institutions and networks (i.e., American Institutes for Research, What Works Clearinghouse, EPPI Centre, Educational Evidence Portal, IZA Worlf Labor, Social Science Research Network, The Duckworth Lab, The Grit Institute, Strive Together, Edutopia, Character Lab, and GRITLab).
The search terms (in English and Spanish) reflected the inclusion criteria and tried to strike a balance between sensitivity and specificity. To ensure inclusion of papers, which do not specifically report their research design, population or geographical/cultural restrictions, the search excluded methodology, population, and geographicar cultural restrictions terms. We classified search terms according to two categories, which were combined using the Boolean operator “AND” to identify potentially relevant studies in each database (in all fields from 2006 onwards): (“grit” AND “long term goals” AND “long-term goals” AND “perseverance”) AND (“success” OR “performance” OR “academic” OR “school” OR “grade point average” OR “GPA” OR “achievement” OR “learn*” OR “outcome” OR “retention” OR “effort” OR “education” OR “student” OR “dropout” OR “drop-out” OR “employ*” OR ”job” OR ”jooss” OR “work” OR “unemploy*” OR “un-employ*” OR “underemploy*” OR “under-employ*” OR “satisfaction” OR “weleing” OR “wellbeing” OR “well-being” OR “happiness” OR “optimism” OR “triumph” OR “self”).
In the selection process we implemented the following tasks: (a) the first screening level was aimed at identifying and removing duplicate records and/or publisheefore 2006, (b) the second screening level was aimed at identifying and removing those studies in which the grit term was used with a different meaning from Duckworth’s grit concept, after further examination of the title and abstract, and (c) the third screening level was aimed at reading the full text versions of the studies to ascertain eligibility basen the remaining inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria like the language of publication, type of publication (e.g., newspapers), studies not basen data gathered through Grit-S (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009), and/or studies that do not provide overall grit score (i.e., performing statistical analyses basen Grit sub-scales scores separately). A screening guide was used in the second and third screening level. Basen the review’s inclusion and exclusion criteria, discrepancies were resolvey further review of the respective titles, abstracts and full text, aniscussion. The overall search and screening process were documented in a flow diagram (Figure 1).
Data and information were coded and extracted from included studies. For the analysis, the approach adopted was a narrative content analysis (Dochy, 2006), and eligible studies were coden variables related to: (a) study methods (i.e., sampling technique and procedure, response rate/attrition, representativeness, research design, statistical analysis, anias), (b) predictor variables (e.g., grit, age, educationaevel, performance, self-control, etc.), (c) outcome variables (e.g., grit, GPA, performance, cognitive skills, etc.), (d) characteristics of the subject samples of analysis (i.e., sample size, mean and range age, and gender), and (e) contextual features (i.e., author/s, country, publication year, and title).
Results
The initial search identified a totaf 5,855 publications (3,901 in primary search, and 1,954 in a complementary search). After checking for duplicated publications and/or publisheefore 2006 (first screening level), 2,248 publications were excluded. Then, the title and abstract of 3,607 publications were examined (second screening level) and 3,292 publications were excluded. Finally, after reading the full text versions of 315 publications (third screening level) a totaf 78 publications (containing 90 studies) qualified for the analysis, with 8 studies that were not obtained in full text despite repeated attempts tocate them. Out of those 78 publications, 3 included 2 studies, 3 included 3 studies, and 1 included 4 studies, so the final N was 90 studies. Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart for the literature search and screening.
Features of Grit Research
First, we present the main features of the grit research tffer a clearer picture of the field, in order to answer our first research question.
Contextual features. The totaf studies selecteelong to 11 countries, 78 from the United States of America, 2 from South Africa, 2 from Canada, and 1 each from Turkey, South Korea, Norway, United Kingdom, Philippine, China, Holland, anenmark. The studies were publisheetween 2009 (n = 5) and 2017 (n = 3) (i.e., 2011 = 2; 2012 = 6; 2013 = 6; 2014 = 37; 2015 = 22; 2016 = 9). Of the reviewed studies, 41 were parts of journal publications, 29 were reported in dissertation theses, 8 in master’s theses, and 12 came from other sources such as conference proceeding (n = 6), working papers (n = 1), poster (n = 1) or institutional research reports (n = 4).
Sample
The studies reviewed include a total 70,963 participants, with a sample size ranging from 15 participants to 15,874 participants. Gender distribution varies among studies, with 72 studies including samples composey males and females, 5 studies with only males, and 13 studies failing to report this data. Studies samples are composed generally by several ethnic groups except for 3 studies composenly by African American high school, college, or university students, 1 by white-Hispanic university students, and 1 by Latino students. In relation to studies’ population the review yielded the following results: 3 military, 4 children (i.e., finalists in the 2006 Scripps national spelling bee and children with reading disorder, childhood ADHD), 13 elementary, middle or high school students, 1 adult student who returned to a specific charter high school to complete a high schooiploma, 1 promise academy students, 35 undergraduate and postgraduate students, 1 doctoral student, 13 workers (e.g., teachers, principals, police detectives, mental health workers, employed students, etc.), 12 diverse populations (e.g., general population, adolescents, adults, adults aged 18-72 years, runners, etc.), and 7 mixed (e.g., undergraduate students, parents and grandparents, students and teachers).
Design
In relation to the studies research design our review identified a totaf 19 studies (21.1%) failing to explicitly mention this information, although it was eventually inferrey reviewers from the rest of the information reported. Thus, the studies methodological features regarding research design show the following distribution: (a) 6 experimentaesigns (6.6%), (b) 6 pre-experimentaesigns (6.6%), with 1 study including a static-group design, and 5 including one-group pretest-posttest design, (c) 2 ex post factesigns or retrospective studies (2.2%), and (d) 76 correlationaesigns or predictive and explanatory studies (84.6%), with 68 cross-sectional and 8 longitudinal.
All studies gathereata through the English original version of the Grit-S scale (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009), except for 1 study using the Turkish version of the Grit-S scale (Akın et al., 2011).
The dominant statistical analyses were bivariate (e.g., t-test, U-test, chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance) and multivariate (e.g., two-way analysis of variance, regression and path analysis), considering that studies using only descriptive or correlational analysis (i.e., Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall tau) were selecteut from our analysis. Additionally, sampling techniques were distributed as follows: 84 non-probabilistic (e.g., purposive sampling, convenience sampling, snowball sampling) and 6 probabilistic (e.g., random sampling).
Finally, reporting bias were included in 78 studies (86.67%) but not in 12 studies (13.33%).
Evidences of Grit as Predictor
In the case of grit as predictor our review found a totaf 57 studies (see Table 1).
Note. Numbers represent studies references.
1Study 1; 2Study 2; 3Study 3; 4Study 4; 5Study 5; 6Study 6; 7Grit as mediator/moderator.
In relation to educational success a totaf 25 studies were found. Grit predicts educational attainment among general population, university, middle and high school students. Additionally, grit predicts GPA among middle school students, high school students, undergraduate students, and non-traditionaoctoral students. Furthermore, grit predicts retention among freshmen and candidates at the United States Military Academy, the National Guard Youth Challenge Program Cadets at the Washington Youth Academy, and the 24-day Army Speciaperations Forces selection course, and potentiaropping-out among foreign university students and career changes in general population.
In relation to grit as predictor of professional success a totaf 11 studies have been identified. Grit predicts objective career success like career status and salary, retention in the workplace, or teaching effectiveness, but not subjective career success, like career or job satisfaction, task performance or turnover intention. Additionally, grit predicts well-being, burnout, or stress in the workplace, optimism of principals, and work engagement among police detectives.
Finally, another set of 26 studies focusen personal success variables. For analyzing and synthesizing purposes, the different outcome variables were grouped into five categories (i.e., cognitive skills, engagement, mental health, physical health, and relationships) with twf them accumulating most of the studies and evidences. That is the case of cognitive skills (n = 11), representing quite diverse outcomes related to performance like spelling, literacy, expectations, and problem solving (e.g., anagrams, tasks that are basen clicking the computer mouse or solving math problems), and engagement as beliefs about intelligence. Furthermore, grit predicts subjective reports of psychological health care management skills among university students, satisfaction with life in general populations, and frequency and intensity of spiritual and transcendent experiences happening within the context of everyday life. Grit also has indirect effect on suicide attempts, but direct effect of grit on suicide attempts was not significant. Grit is positively related to subjective reports of physical health, as well as exercise behavior, with moderate and high intensity, but neither variable was related tow intensity exercise, among university students, staff, and faculty. Finally, grit predicts romantic relationship satisfaction among adults, and grit-gender interactions explain variance in the retention marital status.
Evidences of Grit as Outcome. In the case of grit as outcome our review found a totaf 56 studies (see Table 2). Out of those, 28 studies target socio-demographic variables as predictors of grit. Results show that age and gender/sex predict grit level among students (e.g., university, middle, and high school) and general population, with older students showing higher levef grit and women inclined to report higher levels of grit. Concurrently, age and gender/sex are rejectey some of these studies as predictors of grit; with other failing to find significant results from age and gender/sex. Additionally, grit does not differ by marital status in adults, and there are no significant differences observed in grit as reportey students (e.g., university, middle and high school) or according to religious background, socioculturaevel, socioeconomic level, and ethnicity/race. While, some studies reveaifferences between Caucasian, Hispanic, anlack students and adults.
Note. Numbers represent studies references
Study 1; 2Study 2; 3Study 3; 4Study 4; 5Study 5; 6Study 6. Interventions aimed at developing solutions to achieve a goal (grit as either 7primary or 8secondary dependent variable). 9Grit as a part of model
In relation to educational variables as predictors of grit, a totaf 13 studies were analyzed; 5 of these studies reveal that educationaevel predicts grit, while on the contrary, 4 studies do not find significant results. Furthermore, different institutional conditions and characteristics, such as location, type and climate, do not significantly impact on grit, as well as certain students’ conditions and characteristics, like, for example, enrollment status, specialties, or credit hours earned. However, negative effects on students’ grit levels are found for those who self-identified as international students, those who get a high GPA and those attending charter schools.
In relation to professional variables, 5 studies were analyzed with no statistically significant differences on grit between the different occupational types and professional performance, like, for example, teacher trust in the principal and teacher efficacy.
Finally, in relation to personal variables as predictors of grit, 28 studies were analyzed. Non-cognitive factors, like passion, dispositional resilience, sense of relatedness to various social partners (e.g., friends, teachers and parents), orientations to happiness, optimism, self-control, and positive affect have impact on grit, in the same way as cognitive factors, such as cognitive ability, general intelligence, perceived stress, hope, search for meaning, aneliefs about intelligence. Moreover, self-transcendent motives, intrinsic self-oriented motives, extrinsic self-oriented motives for going to college, self-efficacy, purpose commitment, and achievement goarientations significantly predict grit levels. Exercisers among university students, staff, and faculty report significantly higher grit levels than non-exercisers, dedication, year and reason to running among runners predicts grit, and the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (fALFF) could significantly predict individuaifferences in grit, and partially mediates the influence of grit on academic performance. However, family support does not contribute to the overall prediction of grit among Latina/o college students, and there is no relationship between students’ placements along Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Ethicaevelopment (i.e., how students understand the world and the nature of knowledge) and grit. Interventions aimed at developing solutions to achieve a goal (grit as either primary or secondary dependent variable), as a brief mindfulness and yoga intervention, a parent training and cognitive training for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, a college and career coaching program, a youth mentoring partnership’s friend fitness program, and a grit lesson program for parent and teachers do not show impact on grit. Conversely, a grit lesson program for students reveals impact on grit.
Discussion
According tur initial research objective and questions, our results suggest, firstly, that current scientific investigation focusen this construct is not as systematic and as rigorous, as we woulike tr, in other words, that there is a need to strengthen the quality of the evaluation research designs utilized, as well as to carry out more impact evaluation studies on grit as predictor and as outcome. Secondly, our results reveal that there are evidences of effectiveness of grit as predictor of educational, professional, and personal success, and also that grit can be influencey an array of socio-demographic, educational, professional, and personal factors. However, the limited number of studies founearing empirical evidences basen credible research designs, as well as the relative strength of those evidences of effectiveness, prevent us from drawing causainks on grit as predictor of the different types of success analyzed, as well as grit as outcome.
Although there is consensus among the main initiatives (e.g., What Works Clearinghouse "WWC", Best Evidence Encyclopedia) to produce syntheses of evidences of effectiveness basen meeting rigorous standards of evaluation, and showing positive impacts, the fact is, as Slavin (2016) points out, that deciding the impact and “weight” of those methodological features (i.e., effect size, sample size, research-made vs. independent measures, publication bias, or interactions among other factors) on program effectiveness bring along important differences. Those differences couletermine, in turn, whether that levef evidence is rated as “strong” (i.e., supportey at least one randomized study), “moderate” (i.e., supportey at least one quasi-experimental study), or “promising” (i.e., supported at least by one correlational study with pretests as covariates), if we follow, for example, the categories proposey the Every Student Succeeds Act in the United States of America.
In that regard, a closer look to the data found shows that the current capacity of grit to predict educational success across domains (e.g., educational attainment, educational performance) or target populations (e.g., school and university students, general populations) rest on two sets of evidences. One set of evidences coule rated as “strong” basen the high-quality evaluation research designs supporting those evidences, and the other one coule rated as “promising”, because of the lower quality of the research design of the studies accounting for those evidences.
In the first case the strength of the evidences is limited, however, by two factors: (a) the scarce number of high-quality studies found (i.e., Gerhards & Gravert, 2015; Lucas et al., 20153; Sending, 20143), which reduces the necessary statistical power of studies supporting grit as predictor of personautcomes (i.e., cognitive skills), and (b) the existence of studies reporting the same outcome measure but failing to reach statistical significance (i.e., Gerhards & Gravert, 2015; Lucas et al., 20151, 2; Sending, 20143). In any case, these results yield concern about the validity of the strength found anoubts on whether these evidences qualify or not as “acceptable” or “strong”, depending on whether we follow WWC standards and categories (i.e., programs can be considered effective if they do not analyze data at the proper leveut produce an effect size of +0.25 or more) (WWC, 2014) or, alternatively, Best Evidence Encyclopedia (i.e., there must be correspondence between unit of assignment and treatment and analysis using hierarchicainear modeling or comparable methods) (Slavin, 2016).
The second set of evidences need te considered as “promising”, fundamentally because of the type of research designs supporting those evidences (i.e., pre-experimental, ex post facto, and correlational vs. experimentar quasi-experimental), as well as the concurrence of other potential sources of methodologicaias in those studies results like: (a) small sample size (i.e., n < 250 = 46, 51.11%) (e.g., Dassler, 2016), (b) the heterogeneity of the sample, with grit functioning differently within different subgroups of the sample (e.g., Weston, 2015), (c) the use of researcher-made vs. independent measures (e.g., Van Doorn, 2014), (d) the lack of experimental-control comparison with evidence of no pre-test differences among the two groups (e.g., Goodman et al., 2014), (e) how students records were collected via school and university records anatabases (e.g., Richmond, 2015) or self-report (e.g., Cross, 2013), (f) which subjects are analyzed, since the hypothesis that grit would interact with previous grades to predict current grades was not supported (e.g., Hatchimonji, 2016), (g) whether those records correspond to specific subjects (e.g., Fillmore, 2015) or the totar average of those subjects (e.g., Zimmerman & Brogan, 2015), (h) whether they refer to semesters (e.g., Engel, 2013), academic or school year (e.g., West et al., 2014), or accumulated (cumulative college GPA; finaaw school GPA) (e.g., Wang et al., 2017), and (i) what interactions are analyzed (e.g., grit data against grades from the earliest years of college could not indicate actual use of grit behaviors, as students are only beginning their long-term goaf obtaining a bachelor’s degree is reportey Black, 2014). In this context, the identification of studies showing no significant results with small sample size (e.g., Salles et al., 2014), or the way “performance” is measured (e.g., study 39 measured “task performance” throughout a questionnaire including a selection of items adapted from other scales) represent examples, as Slavin (2016) points, of how studies methodological factors can vary and their potential effects on the outcomes measured as effectiveness (i.e., effect size).
Additionally, some of the statistically significant results identified are modest in terms of variance explained (e.g., Muenks et al., 2016), which aligns with that of Rimfeld et al. (2016), in which grit addenly 0.5% to the prediction of another educational variable like the General Certificate of Secondary Education exams. Furthermore, according to these authors, the small effect coming from that high-quality research study (using a large representative sample of the United Kingdom population at the age 16) warrant concern against the decision of educational policies directives in the United States and the United Kingdom. On the contrary, our results partially endorse the decision of promoting grit as a critical factor for success in the 21st century, as reportey Shechtman et al. (2013). Moreover, our results on grit studies as significant predictor of life outcomes, when controlling for Big Five personality factors, although explaining only minor incremental variance (e.g., Duckworth & Quinn, 20096), align with those of Duckworth and Eskreis-Winkler (2013), Duckworth et al. (2007), Eskreis-Winkler, Shulman, Beal et al. (2014), and Von Culin et al. (2014) and endorse the salient capacity of grit as unique psychological factor determining success.
The situation underlying grit research as outcome is more complex, with just one high-quality study (i.e., Kraft & Grace, 2015) reporting no statistically significant impact on grit from professional (i.e., performance) variables, and another high-quality study (i.e., Sending, 20143) bearing significant statistical results, although for two key socio-demographic variables (i.e., age and gender/sex as predictor). In the literature, grit was found to increase over the lifespan (Duckworth et al., 2007), so the apparently contradictory results on this variable coule attributed to particular methodologicaias or a combination of those like the presence of a sub sample within the sample (i.e., Cross, 2013). Similar controversial results were found for other predictors like “gender/sex” and “ethnicity/race”, although we have failed to find more plausible answers than the dominant presence of white female samples. The rest of the studies adopting pre-experimental, ex-post facto, or correlationaesigns on socio-demographic factors (i.e., gender/sex), educational factors (i.e., GPA), and personal factors (i.e., non-cognitive factors, cognitive factors, and physical activity) report no significant differences (i.e., Sutton et al., 2014) and significant differences (i.e., Lyon, 2014) respectively. Additionally, the variability of variables measured under the category named “non-cognitive factors” (e.g., “resilience”, “perceived stress”, “hope”, “higher levels of theoretically relevant masculine norms”, or “openness to experience”), and the identification of studies with apparently contradictory results (e.g., Incantalupo-Kuhner, 2015) recommends te cautious when interpreting these results, because of the limitations of current available measures accompanying some of those variables (Duckworth & Yeager, 2015), as well as the potential methodologicaias underlying such results due to the adoption of less reliable research designs (i.e., correlational). Moreover, the category named “cognitive factors” representing variables like “cognitive ability” (i.e., Yeager et al., 20141), “implicit theories of intelligence” (i.e., Fillmore, 2015), “perceived stress” (i.e., Saunders-Scott et al., 2014), or “subjective happiness” (i.e., Vela et al., 2015) needs more research to improve the predictive usefulness of some of those concepts like “conscientiousness”, as some studies suggest (Credé et al., 2016; Duckworth et al., 2007; Eisenberg et al., 2014; MacCann et al., 2009).
In sum, from the evidence-based movement perspective, our synthesis reveals that, on one hand, the research fieln grit as predictor of educational, professional, and personal success and grit as outcome needs to increase the robustness of the evidences found as well as their comparability. On the other hand, the field is moving fast in the “pipeline” classification suggestey the Institute of Education Sciences and National Science Foundation (2013). Indeed, our results on grit as predictor and particularly as outcome conform to that classification of research development with abundance of studies corresponding to the first two types of studies (i.e., “foundational” and “early-stage or exploratory research”), which examines relationships (usually correlational rather than causal) among relevant constructs in learning and education to provide the fundamental knowledge contributing to set the theoretical (i.e., Duckworth, 2006; Duckworth et al., 2007) and methodologicaases (i.e., Duckworth & Quinn, 2009) even internationally (i.e., Akın et al., 2011; Nishikawa et al., 2015) to inform, guide, support, and conduct more causal research studies in the following years. Furthermore, our results also reveal that there is a growing body of more evolved research studies corresponding to the next level category named “design anevelopment” (type xxx3), focusen grit as predictor or grit as outcome (i.e., Lyon, 2014) successfully contributing to achieve the goaf improving grit levels across populations intentionally. Although, as Duckworth and Yeager (2015) recommend, it is more important to start working on reaching consensus about the specific attributes to focus on and, in particular, their definition and measurement.
Hopefully, in the near future, the progressive implementation of more advanced types of research like “efficacy research” (type xxx4), “effectiveness research” (type xxx5) and, eventually, “scale-up research” (type xxx6) will allow researchers, educators, and practitioners tistill more effective strategies and interventions on grit in a wider range of populations and settings. Concurrently, complementary research strategies aimed at expanding large-scale longitudinaata on different subgroups of populations appear as unavoidable, if we want to accelerate the pace of the transference of the evidence-based movement and their benefits into the fielf education in general anf grit in particular. In such scenario, we wile able to translate more effectively our educational and training efforts on grit intetter supply of skilled, employable youth as Hossain anloom (2015), and Schleicher (2018) recommend.
Limitations
The protocol we developed following the guidelines providey The Campbell Collaboration (2015) was compatible with the realization of a systematic review and a meta-analysis. However, as we completed the process of extracting the prescribeata from the studies sampled, we realized that a meta-analysis would not be feasible. The main reasons are related to underreporting problems affecting some of the quantities (i.e., alpha, power, effect size, N) and qualities (i.e., the hypothesis/aim/objective of the study is clearly described, measures are accurate – valid and reliable –, randomization is clearly stated) of most of the studies sampled.
Our final review intends te as valid, unbiased, and meaningful as possible to respond tur broad research questions. However, the process of producing high-quality syntheses of program evaluation research can be compromisey subjectivity permeating supposebjective decisions and method (e.g., the framing of the question, the choice of eligible studies, the selection of comparisons, populations, anutcomes of interest, the types of data extracted), which allows for substantiaiversity in the final results (Ioannidis, 2016). Thus, the design and implementation of the research protocol has unveiled several potential sources of bias. For example, the fact that grit is a research topic “under construction” has conditioned the ‘objective’ inclusion criteria for systematic reviews recommendey Slavin (2008), Van Klaveren ane Wolf (2013), or WWC (2014). In this vein, considering that we pursued to portraying the state of the art concerning the quality of grit research, we have faced the typical reviewers’ dilemma about how much stringent the inclusion criteria shoule, because of the risk of finding a few studies (or even a single study) qualifying as examples of those (high or strong) quality levef evidences. The broader the inclusion criteria, the larger the number of studies sampled, although at the expense of having a very wide range in study quality (i.e., research design), which makes more difficult tetermine unique effects of factors that affect outcomes even in well-controlled studies (Cheung & Slavin, 2016). That is the case of this review, in which the research questions posed (i.e., state of the art on grit research) has lead, in spite of using only Duckworth’s (2006) definition, on one hand, to a pulf studies with an enormous variability of methodological features (e.g., researcher-made vs. independent measures, sample size, research design, lack of information on correlations among factors) and, on the other hand, to a too small number of high-quality studies for adequate statistical power. Consequently, both features have prevented this review, in turn, from applying an evaluation synthesis method to rate the strength of the evidence base and the size of the anticipated effects for each program in an easy and well-justified manner, as Slavin (2008) recommends.
Additionally, the prevalence of reporting bias affecting social sciences literature in general identifiey several publications (American Psychological Association, 2008; Higgins et al., 2011; The Campbell Collaboration, 2015) applies also to this body of research. In fact, the reviewer’s inferences about the studies methodological features because of the underreporting problems affecting the majority of the studies reviewed, particularly those with correlationar cross-sectionaesign, recommends to take these results with caution. Additionally, the lack of previous syntheses research on this particular topic or subject, including the relationship between methodology and effect size, makes it impossible to compare our results with others as recommended (Slavin, 2016).
Conclusions
Embracing evidences as a basis for practice requires the existence of scientifically valid and readily interpretable syntheses of research on a particular practice or program anur findings suggest that the implementation of full-scale programs to enhance grit might be premature. However, using the Education Sciences and National Science Foundation framework as a reference, we found evidence of types one through three studies regarding the grit construct. Basen these findings, research on the construct is off to a good start, even though more research is needed. For example, the results on educational variables as predictors of grit, apart from being apparently contradictory, do not yield much munition to guide educational interventions or programs. Alternatively, our data on interventions aiming to modify personal factors do provide an array of promising interventions to teach and foster qualities related to grit (e.g., optimism, self-control, perseverance) via educational interventions targeting not only youth but also parents and teachers, as Lyon (2014) demonstrates.
In this line, more high-quality evaluation and research designs are necessary to improve the primary research evaluation and reporting standards in both scenarios, which wilead towards more proven practices and programs on grit development and tearn which specific activities are most effective in producing better outcomes. As Ioannidis (2016) points, “more shoule done to improve the quality of the primary evidences rather than expect systematic reviews to correct deficiencies after the fact” (p. 504).
Finally, aligned with Glennerster (2012) arguments on the power of evidence, school-to-work legislation has te developed to ensure that intervention programs and training activities on grit in-and-out-of-school time could contribute effectively to improve the educational and personautcomes of children and young adults.
Cite this article as: Fernández-Martín, F. D., Arco-Tirado, J. L., & Hervás-Torres, M. (2020). Grit as a predictor anutcome of educational, professional and personal success: A systematic review. Psicología Educativa, 26(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2020a11
Funding: This work is an outcome of the EU-funded collaborative research project CUPESSE (Cultural Pathways to Economic Self-Sufficiency and Entrepreneurship; Grant Agreement No. 613257).
References with an asterisk refer to articles included in this SR.
Akın, A., Abacı, R., Arıcı, N., Uysal, R., & Uysal, Ç. K. (2011, September). Revised Grit Scale: The validity and reliability study. Paper presented at the XX National Education Symposium. Burdur, Turkey.
*Akın A., & Arslan, S. (2014). The relationships between achievement goarientations and grit. Education and Science, 39(175), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.2125
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. D. (2011). Personality psychology and economics (NBER Working Paper Series No. 16822). Nationaureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16822
American Psychological Association. (2008). Reporting standards for research in Psychology. American Psychologist, 63(9), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
*Anderson, D. L. (2012). Goal multiplicity: A multiple goarientation (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3524472).
*Anestis, M. D., Kleiman, E. M., Lavender, J. M., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K. L. (2014). The pursuit of death versus escape from negative affect: An examination of the nature of the relationship between emotion dysregulation anoth suicidaehavior and non-suicidal self-injury. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(8), 1820-1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.007
Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernández-Martín, F. D., & Hoyle, H. R. (2018). Development and validation of a spanish version of the Grit-S scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00096
*Arouty, D. (2015). Does character matter?; The role of grit and resilience in predicting academic success (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3734780).
*Aycock, M. (2014). Characteristics of tenacious teachers in Alabama: A comparison and measurement of banirectors’ grit and self-efficacy in low, medium, and high ses schools (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3683630).
*Barton, Y. A., & Miller, L. (2015). Spirituality and positive psychology go hand in hand: An investigation of multiple empirically derived profiles and related protective benefits. Journaf Religion and Health, 54, 829-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0045-2
*Batres, I. (2011). The relationship of grit, subjective happiness and meaning in life on alternative education students’ GPA and attendance (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3480016).
*Black, K. R. (2014). Grit in college students: Associations with achievement and parental influences (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1573292).
Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journaf Human Resources, 43, 972-1059. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.4.972
*Burkhart, R. A., Tholey, R. M., Guinto, D., Yeo, C. J., & Chojnacki, K. A. (2014). Grit: A marker of residents at risk for attrition?; Surgery, 155(6), 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.01.015
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimentaesigns for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
*Chambers, R., Brawley, A. M., Castille, C. M., & Tubré, T. (2012, March). Examining the validity of the Resilience Quotient. Poster presented at the 26th National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR). Ogden, UT. http://alicebrawley.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chambers-Brawley-Castille-Tubre_NCUR_2012.pdf
*Chang, W. (2014). Grit and academic performance: Is being grittier better?; (Doctoraissertation). Open Access Dissertations (paper 1306).
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615
*Clark, R. S. (2016). Grit within the context of career success: A mixed method study (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 10144935).
Credé, M., Tynan, C., & Harms, P. D. (2016). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journaf Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102
*Cross, T. M. (2013). Staying the course: Grit, academic success, and non-traditionaoctoral students (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3587687).
*Dassler, B. W. (2016). Take stock matters: Pre-college factors and their relationship to attainment, a study of a Florida-based college access program (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 10410482).
*Datu, J. A. D. (2017). Sense of relatedness is linked to higher grit in a collectivist setting. Personality and Individuaifferences, 105, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.039
Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., & King, R. B. (2016). Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the Short Grit Scale in a collectivist setting. Current Psychology, 35(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9374-2
*Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. Jr. (2014). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving charter schools on non-test score outcomes. Nationaureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19581
Dochy, F. (2006). A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/educational-research-review/
Duckworth, A. L. (2006). Intelligence is not enough: Non-IQ predictors of achievement (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3211063).
Duckworth, A. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Ungar, L. H. (2015). The mechanics of human achievement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(7), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12178
Duckworth, A. L., & Eskreis-Winkler, L. (2013, April). True grit. The Observer, 26(4). http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/april-13/true-grit.html
Duckworth, A. L., & Eskreis-Winkler, L. (2015). Grit. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social anehavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 397-401). Elsevier.
*Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the national spelling bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385872
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journaf Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journaf Personality Assessment, 91, 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
*Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. Journaf Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157232
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237-251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327
*Egalite, A. J., Jonathan, J. N., & Greene, J. P. (2016). The softer side of learning: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills. Improving Schools, 19(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480215616313
Eisenberg, N., Duckworth, A. L., Spinrad, T. L., & Valiente, C. (2014). Conscientiousness: Origins in childhood?; Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1331-1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030977
*Engel, L. I. (2013). What predicts first semester College performance?; Cognitive ability, SAT, conscientiousness, and grit (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3594291).
*Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S. A., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036
*Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Survivor mission: Do those who survive have a drive to thrive at work?; The Journaf Positive Psychology, 9(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888579
Fernández-Martín, F. D., Arco-Tirado, J. L., & Soriano, M. (2018). Perseverance and passion for achieving long-term goals: Transcultural adaptation and validation of the GRIT-S scale. Revista de Psicología Social. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2018.1482060
*Fillmore, E. P. (2015). Grit aneliefs about intelligence: The relationship and role these factors play in the self-regulatory processes involved in medical students learning gross anatomy (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3703778).
García, E. (2014). The need to address noncognitive skill in the education policy agenda (EPI Briefing Paper No. 386). Economic Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-591-3_3
*Gerhards, L., & Gravert, C. (2015). Grit trumps talent?; an experimental approach (Economics Working Papers). https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/40826
Glennerster, R. (2012). The power of evidence: Improving the effectiveness of government by investing in more rigorous evaluation. National Institute Economic Review, 219(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011221900102
*Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Mallard, T. T., & Schumann, M. (2014). A brief mindfulness and yoga intervention with an entire NCAA division I athletic team: An initial investigation. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(4), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000022
Gutman, L. M., & Schoon, I. (2013). The impact of non-cognitive skills on outcomes for young people. Literature review. The Education Endowment Foundation and Institute of Education, University of London.
*Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgment anecision Making, 8(3), 188-201. http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13124a/jdm13124a.pdf
*Hatchimonji, D. R. (2016). Grit in Latino middle school students: Construct validity and psychometric properties of the short grit scale (Master’s thesis; The State University of New Jersey). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 10095834).
Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. D. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills (NBER Working Paper Series No. 18121). Cambridge, MA: Nationaureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18121
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzúa, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and sociaehavior (NBER Working Paper Series No. 12006). Nationaureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12006
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., & Sterne, J. (Eds.) (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green S (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration.
*Hill, P. L., Burrow, A. L., & Bronk, K. C. (2014). Persevering with positivity and purpose: An examination of purpose commitment and positive affect as predictors of grit. Journaf Happiness Studies, 17(1), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9593-5
Hossain, F., & Bloom, D. (2015). Toward a better future. Evidence on improving employment outcomes for disadvantaged youth in the United States. Building Knowledge to Improve Social Policy.
*Incantalupo-Kuhner, J. (2015). Teacher dispositions and perceived environment: The relationship among grit, resiliency, and perceptions of school climate (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3724688).
Institute of Education Sciences and National Science Foundation. (2013). Common guidelines for education research anevelopment. United States Department of Education and United State National Science Foundation.
Ioannidis, P. A. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 485- 514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210
*Johnson, L. A. (2014). An analysis of minority student’s perceptions of the campus climate and sense of belonging (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3622645).
*Karlson, R. W. (2014). Perry’s scheme of intellectual and ethicaevelopment influence on duckworth’s short grit score in interior design students (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1585588).
*Kench, D., Hazelhurst, S., & Otulaja, F. (2016, july). Grit and growth mindset among high school students in a computer programming project: A mixed methods study. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association. Cullinan, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_18
Kim, Y. J., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Effects of grit on the successful aging of the elderly in Korea. Indian Journaf Science and Technology, 8(S7), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS7/70421
*Kraft, M. A., & Grace, S. (2015). Teaching for tomorrow’s economy?; Elementary teacher effects on complex tasks, grit, and growth mindset. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoccitations;jsessionid=76EBC1A79A25B54A8F0FB97BD13F1AC0?;doi=10.1.1.696.2367
*Lerner, A. M. A. (2013). Gritty students: The effect of perseverance on retention for traditional and nontraditional students. Proceeding of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6813/view
*Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., Cheng, L., & Marsella, S. (2015). When the going gets tough: Grit predicts costly perseverance. Journaf Research in Personality, 59, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.08.004
*Lyon, A. C. (2014). Teaching and fostering qualities related to grit (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3636966).
MacCann, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning and Individuaifferences, 19(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007
*Madden, J. H. (2015). Relationships of principal grit, teacher trust in the principal, and faculty organizational commitment in Alabama public high schools (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3711291).
*Madrigal, L. (2014). The relationships among mental toughness, hardiness, optimism and coping: A structural equation modeling approach (Doctoraissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3624208).
*Major, C. (2013). Youth mentoring partnership’s friend fitness program: Theoretical foundations and promising preliminary findings from a new positive Psychology intervention for grit and positive youth development (Master’s thesis, University of Pennsylvania). http://repository.upenn.edu/mapp_capstone/48
*McCutcheon, C. A. (2014). Perseverance and persistence in achieving educational goals: A case study of an adult charter high school examining perseverance of students utilizing a mixed methods approach (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3667827).
Méndez, I., & Zamarro, G. (2015). The intergenerational transmission of noncognitive skills and their effect on education and employment outcomes (CESR Schaeffer Working Paper Series No. 2015-015). Center for Economic & Social Research. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628783
*Meriac, J. P., Slifka, J. S., & LaBat, L. R. (2015). Work ethic and grit: An examination of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individuaifferences, 86, 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.009
*Mills, J. N. (2015). The effectiveness of cash transfers as a policy instrument in K-16 Education (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3714203).
*Moore, S. B. (2015). A random assignment evaluation of a college and career coaching program (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3717904).
*Moshier, S. J., Szuhany, K. L., Hearon, B. A., Smits, J. A., & Otto, M. W. (2016). Anxiety sensitivity uniquely predicts exercise behaviors in young adults seeking to increase physical activity. Behavior Modification, 40(1-2), 178-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515603704
*Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., Yang, J. S., & O’Neal, C. R. (2016). How true is grit?; Assessing its relations to high school and college students’ personality characteristics, self-regulation, engagement, and achievement. Journaf Educational Psychology, 109(5), 599-620. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000153
Nishikawa, K., Okugami, S., & Amemiya, T. (2015). Development of the Japanese grit scale (Grit-S) "in Japanese". The Japanese Journaf Personality, 24(2), 167-169. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/personality/24/2/24_167/_pdf
*Pendame, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial intent and perseverance among South African students (Master’s thesis, University of the Witwatersrand). http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/jspui/bitstream/10539/15568/1/Richard_Pendame_MM_research_report.pdf
*Reed, J. (2014). A survey of grit and exercise behavior. Journaf Sport Behavior, 37(4), 390-406.
*Reed, J., Pritschet, B. L., & Cutton, D. M. (2012). Grit, conscientiousness, and the transtheoretical modef change for exercise behavior. Journaf Health Psychology, 18(5), 612-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312451866
*Richmond, M. (2015). G and non-g influences GPA for Hispanics and Whites: A Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to Spearman’s law of diminishing returns (SLDOR) (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3721742).
Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journaf Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 780-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000089
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychology Science, 2(4), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. I. (2014). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1315-1330. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031109
Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predicts effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211426/pdf/nihms515928.pdf
*Robinson, W. L. (2015). Grit anemographic characteristics associated with nursing student course engagement (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3718182).
*Rutledge, K. J. (2012). Review and comparative effectiveness of parent training and cognitive training for treating attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, ProQuest Psychology Journals. (UMI No. 3555409).
*Salles, A., Cohen, G. L., & Mueller, C. M. (2014). The relationship between grit and resident well-being. American Journaf Surgery, 207(2), 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.006
Sartori, R., Costantini, A., Ceschi, A., & Scalco, A. (2017). Not only correlations: A different approach for investigating the relationship between the big five personality traits and job performance basen workers and employees’ perception. Quality Quantity, 51, 2507-2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0406-2
*Saunders-Scott, D. P., Braley, M. B., Stennes-Spidahl, N., & Kempf, J. F. (2014). Potential avenue for improving grit and academic success in college. Convention of the American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e539722014-001
Schleicher, A. (2018). World class. How tuild a 21st-century school system. OECD publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/world-class-9789264300002-en.htm
*Scholl, L. S., Spencer, S. M., & Demasi, J. (2014). Grit, self-efficacy, and intention to change major among premedical students. Convention of the American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e551122014-001
*Schrepfer-Tarter, M. A. (2013). An exploratory study of the academic optimism of principals (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3670765).
*Sending, V. (2014). Thinking success, behaving successfully: The relation between hypothetical thinking strategies, effort towards goal attainment and grit (Master’s thesis). The Arctic University of Norway. http://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/6561/thesis.pdf?;sequence=2
*Sharkey, C. M., Bakula, D. M., Gamwell, K. L., Mullins, A. J., Chaney, J. M., & Mullins, L. L. (2017). The role of grit in college student health care management skills and health-related quality of life. The Journaf Pediatric Psychology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx073
Shechtman, N., DeBarger, A. H., Dornsife, C., Rosier, S., & Yarnall, L. (2013). Promoting grit, tenacity, and perseverance: Critical factors for success in the 21st century. United States Department of Education.
Sheldon, K. M., Jose, P. E., Kashdan, T. B., & Jarden, A. (2015). Personality, effective goal-striving, and enhanced well-being: Comparing 10 candidate personality strengths. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573211
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in Education. What works?; Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314117
*Slack, G. O. (2014). The intersectionality between the short grit scale and four measures of academic self-efficacy of African American males enrolled through a remedial program at a historically black college and university (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3647121).
Slavin, R. E. (2016, April 19). Evidence and the every student succeeds act "Blog post". http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-e-slavin/evidence-and-the-essa_b_8750480.html
*Slick, S. N., & Lee, C. S. (2014). The relative levels of grit and their relationship with potentiaropping-out and university adjustment of foreign students in Korea. Journaf Digital Convergence, 12(8), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2014.12.8.61
*Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Tracking choices: Computational analysis of learning trajectories. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educationaata Mining, 316-319. http://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2014/uploads/procs2014/short%20papers/316_EDM-2014-Short.pdf
*Stewart, R. W. (2012). An examination of the perceptions and motivations of african american high school students regarding performance character qualities for future success (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3547167).
*Strayhorn, T. L. (2014). What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions?; Journaf African American Studies, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-012-9243-0
*Sutton, W. T., Malone, L. R., & Atkin, J. R. (2014). Cognitive and noncognitive improvements among cadets at the Washington Youth Academy (WYA). https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/DRM-2014-U-008846-Final.pdf
The Campbell Collaboration. (2015). Campbell collaboration systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines (Supplement). Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015
*Thomas, L. V., Davis, K., Marsh, R., & Margolis, A. (2016). Grit is a protective factor in children with reading disorder. Journaf the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(10), S150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.157
Tiittanen, M. (2014). Grit anifferent aspects of well-being: Direct and indirect effects via sense of coherence and authenticity (Master’s thesis). Lund University. http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?;func=downloadFile&recordOId=4499572&fileOId=4499573
*Vakil, R. H. (2014). Running and grit (Senior Honors Dissertation). http://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/honors_appliedpsychology/6. (Paper 6).
*Van Doorn, M. J. (2014). Personality determinants of employee performance: Beyond the Big Five. https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?;fid=133667
Van Klaveren, C., & De Wolf, I. (2013). Systematic reviews in education research: When do effect studies provide evidence?; (TIER Working Paper No. 13/02). http://www.tierweb.nl/assets/files/UM/Working%20papers/When%20do%20Effect%20Studies%20Provide%20Evidence%20Working%20Paper.pdf
*Vela, J. C., Lu, M. T. P., Lenz, A. S., & Hinojosa, K. (2015). Positive psychology and familial factors as predictors of Latina/o students’ psychological grit. Hispanic Journaf Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315588917
*Verdesco, A. L. (2016). Educational expectations, social normative expectations, and grit in an urban middle school (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 10297493).
*Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journaf Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.898320
*Walker, A., Hines, J., & Brecknell, J. (2016). Survivaf the grittiest?; Consultant surgeons are significantly grittier than their junior trainees. Journaf Surgical Education, 73(4), 730-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.01.012
*Wang, S., Zhou, M., Chen, T., Yang, X., Chen, G., Wang, M., & Gong, Q. (2017). Grit and the brain: Spontaneous activity of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex mediates the relationship between the trait grit and academic performance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(3), 452-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw145
*Waring, A. (2015). The influence of attachment and grit on life satisfaction and romantic relationship satisfaction (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1714093820). (UMI No. 3664015).
*West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F. O., & Gabrieli, D. E. G. (2014). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. CESifo Area Conference on Economics of Education. http://cepr.harvard.edu/files/cepr/files/cepr-promise-paradox.pdf
*Weston, L. C. (2015). A replication and extension of psychometric research on the grit scale (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1592764).
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, 2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Institute of Education Sciences, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC.
*White, R. E. (2012). Symbolic thought in the service of self-control: Effects of social psychologicaistancing on executive function in young children (Doctoraissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3600505).
*Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journaf Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637.supp
*Zimmerman, E., & Brogan, L. (2015). Grit anegal education. Pace Law Review, 36, 112–157. http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol36/iss1/4
Francisco D. Fernández-Martín, José L. Arco-Tirado, and Mirian Hervás-Torres
University of Granada
© 2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.