Figure 1
Schiaparelli Glacier location. The proglacial lake to the left (west) of Schiaparelli Glacier is named Lago Azul. The inset shows the southernmost tip of South America where Tierra del Fuego is south of the Strait of Magellan; the black areas depict the glaciated areas of Cordillera Darwin. Image: Sentinel 2 RGB , 4 February 2019.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
1 IntroductionIn recent decades, efforts have been made to improve the knowledge of the effects of climate variability on glaciers and associated ecosystems in the Southern Hemisphere's sub-polar region. However, an important part of this region, such as Cordillera Darwin in Tierra del Fuego, southernmost South America, remains poorly explored with critical gaps in information. Here we describe geophysical data from the first ice thickness observations in Cordillera Darwin. The study is part of an international multidisciplinary collaboration to decipher the impact of climate variability and climate change on the cryosphere in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego . The climate of this region is characterised by the effect of year-round prevailing westerly winds, cool summer temperatures, and high rainfall, particularly along the west side of the mountain regions .
Glacier retreat in the region has been occurring since the Little Ice Age . The spatial variability of glacier retreat within Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego responds to different ice dynamic processes given geographical and topographical conditions . Yet most of the glaciers in the region are experiencing major mass loss in comparison with worldwide average rates . It has been concluded that the main cause of rapid retreat is the increase in mean annual temperatures , although ice dynamics and topographic controls are also important .
Figure 2
The radar track is shown in black. The coloured area depicts the interpolation of the bedrock elevation using the GPR data and surface data (SRTM, LP DACC NASA version 3) as a reference, using a triangulated irregular network (TIN) grid. A, B, and C indicate the respective positions in Fig. . The upper frame (a) shows a photo taken during the GPR measurement from B towards the ice-dammed lagoon (north side). The lower frame (b) shows the team performing the measurements from A to B. Tx and Rx are the transmitter and receiver carriers respectively.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Schiaparelli Glacier (24.78 km) is the northernmost glacier of the Sarmiento Massif in western Tierra del Fuego (5423 S, 7052 W) (Fig. ). It flows towards the NW, being exposed to atmospheric circulation from the Pacific Ocean and thus being an indicator of glacial response to oceanic climatic variability related to both warming trends and variability in atmospheric circulation patterns . The glacier calves into Lago Azul, for which recent bathymetry observations (April 2018) show a lake depth of approximately 60 m at the calving front (subsequent publication data).
Since direct observations of glaciers, such as ice thickness, are crucial to understand ice dynamics, in April 2016 we carried out fieldwork on Schiaparelli Glacier to obtain in situ data. Among other measurements, we collected the first set of ice thickness data of Schiaparelli Glacier . This paper describes the methodology and results obtained using ground-penetrating radar. These data are valuable for further studies on ice dynamic modelling, climate impact research in Cordillera Darwin , and the evaluation of global ice thickness modelling .
2 MethodologyThe ground-penetrating radar used (
The field operation requires three persons: the first holds one extreme of the transmitter antenna, the second carries the transmitter equipment, and the third carries the receiver equipment. The collinear antennas are connected by the extremes with a rope of half-dipole length, resulting in a 40 m total system length (see inset photo in Fig. ).
3 Results
A nearly complete profile across the glacier of approximately 3.1 km (two-way transect) was performed on the lower part of Schiaparelli Glacier. Crevasses on the glacier prevented us from reaching the northern margin of the glacier. We adjusted the parameters, such as vertical range and resolution, during the data collection and obtained seven files (varied size content). We assume a constant wave speed propagation of 0.168 in temperate ice . Data were processed using a commercial software (ReflexW, ). The processing steps include (a) geometric corrections of zero depth considering distance of 24 m between transmitter and receiver, (b) bandpass frequency filter, (c) re-sampling to correct different vertical resolution (number of samples per trace) of files, (d) frequency–wave number (F–K) migration to reduce diffraction noise and correct the position of the bedrock reflectors, and (e) subtracting average values to reduce horizontal noise.
An estimation of depth-average attenuation rate was made based on the method described by . We calculated the power reflected from the bedrock over one transect (A–B) and normalised it to eliminate the inverse square losses due to geometric spreading. We obtained a depth-average attenuation rate of 22.6 from the best-fit line between the ice thickness and the normalised power reflected. Although radar attenuation rates have been calculated in multiple studies on polar ice, these estimations have rarely been made for temperate glaciers. However, our result is in good agreement with those presented in for the Greenland Ice Sheet where they obtained up to 25 by the ice-sheet margin, where ice temperature and conditions might be similar to those of temperate ice in Cordillera Darwin.
Figure 3
Resulting radargrams showing the manually interpreted bedrock in red. The axis shows the distance covered during the measurements. The axis represents the estimated bedrock depth in metres. The lower plot depicts A-scope examples of the attenuation of the signal at different depths from B to A.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure 4
Ice surface and glacier bed elevation along the profiles shown in Fig. .
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Figure shows the resulting compiled radar data with the manual picking of the bedrock interpretation. Ice depth is subject to at least 10 % error due to manual picking, geometrical variations, and the assumption of homogeneous ice. The radar data show a steep U-shaped valley with a maximum ice thickness of 324 m within a distinct glacier trough. The data show that 51 % of the bedrock is below current sea level (Fig. ), reaching a minimum of m within a distinct morphological over-deepening, presumably as a result of glacier erosion. An interpolation of the bedrock elevation was made using the glacier outline for the ablation area covered (Fig. ). Despite the fact that the resulting interpolation suffers from the lack of bedrock data at the north and northwest edges, it provides a fair representation of the valley shape. At the time of the measurements there were visible signs of a recent discharge of an ice-dammed lagoon (Fig. , upper right photo) located at the northern side of the glacier tongue. The mid-depth reflections close to B (Fig. ) suggest we crossed on the surface what might have been a subglacial tunnel through which meltwater drained from the lagoon to the pro-glacial lake.
4 Data availabilityThe dataset containing the georeferenced ice thickness measurements is available for further applications at 10.1594/PANGAEA.919331 .
5 Conclusions
These first results provide a calculation of the ice thickness within the ablation area of Schiaparelli Glacier. Only airborne measurements could provide a full coverage of ice depth data of the glacier due to inaccessibility in crevassed areas. Further retreat of Schiaparelli Glacier will probably lead to an enlarged and strongly overdeepened Lago Azul proglacial lake.
Author contributions
CS, GC, RJ, JA, and IG managed the general project under which GPR data were obtained. GG collected the data supported by the co-authors. IG and JA provided the bathymetry data and information. GG processed the GPR data and prepared the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the CONICYT-BMBF project GABY-VASA (BMBF140052) “Responses of Glaciers, Biosphere and Hydrology to Climate Variability across the Southern Andes”. The field campaign was sponsored by UMAG, INACH, CEQUA e INCT da Criósfera. We wish to thank Roberto Garrido, Stephanie Weidemann, Marcelo Arévalo, and Valentina Peredo for their assistance during fieldwork. We thank the Chilean Navy for the logistic support.
Review statement
This paper was edited by Prasad Gogineni and reviewed by Howard Conway, Kenichi Matsuoka, and one anonymous referee.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Cordillera Darwin in Tierra del Fuego (Chile) remains one of the least studied glaciated regions in the world. However, this region being one of very few terrestrial sites at this latitude in the Southern Hemisphere has the potential to provide key information on the effect of climate variability and climate change on the cryosphere at sub-polar mid-latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere. Schiaparelli Glacier is located at the northern side of the Cordillera Darwin draining the north side of Monte Sarmiento (2187 m a.s.l.). Despite being one of the largest glaciers in the Cordillera Darwin, no previous in situ observation of its ice thickness had been made either at this glacier or at any other location in the Cordillera Darwin. Ice thickness is one of the fundamental parameters to understand glacier dynamics, constrain ice dynamical modelling, and predict glacier evolution. In April 2016 we performed the first successful ice thickness measurements using terrestrial ground-penetrating radar in the ablation area of Schiaparelli Glacier
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Centro de Investigación Gaia Antártica, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
2 Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
3 Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
4 Centro de Investigación Gaia Antártica, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile; CEQUA, Punta Arenas, Chile
5 Instituto Antártico Chileno, Chile, Punta Arenas, Chile





