It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Delivering appropriate stimuli remains a challenge in vision research, particularly for aquatic animals such as zebrafish. Due to the shape of the water tank and the associated optical paths of light rays, the stimulus can be subject to unwanted refraction or reflection artifacts, which may spoil the experiment and result in wrong conclusions. Here, we employ computer graphics simulations and calcium imaging in the zebrafish optic tectum to show, how a spherical glass container optically outperforms many previously used water containers, including Petri dish lids. We demonstrate that aquatic vision experiments suffering from total internal reflection artifacts at the water surface or at the flat container bottom may result in the erroneous detection of visual neurons with bipartite receptive fields and in the apparent absence of neurons selective for vertical motion. Our results and demonstrations will help aquatic vision neuroscientists on optimizing their stimulation setups.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Tübingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Institute for Neurobiology, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447); University of Tübingen, Graduate Training Centre for Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447)
2 Prudenter Agas Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39)
3 University of Tübingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Institute for Neurobiology, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447); University of Tübingen, Graduate Training Centre for Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447); Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (GRID:grid.482245.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2110 3787)
4 University of Tübingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Institute for Neurobiology, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.10392.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1447)