It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The aim of this quantitative, causal-comparative study was to examine differences in teachers’ perceptions of cooperative learning and factors influencing their implementation in the classroom. In order to assess teacher perceptions and current use of cooperative learning, the Cooperative Learning Implementation Questionnaire (CLIQ) developed by Abrami, Poulsen, and Chambers (1998) was used; it was based on the Expectancy Theory, and evaluated the teacher's expectancy of success, perceived value, and perceived cost. For this study, participants were chosen through a convenience sample. This included third, fourth, and fifth grade teachers in public schools located throughout rural and suburban school districts in Florida and Georgia. The 80 participants included, n = 34 third grade teachers, n = 23 fourth grade teachers, n = 23 fifth grade teachers. A Kruskal-Wallis (H test) was used in this study to determine if a statistically significant difference existed in CLIQ mean scores for: expectancy of success, perceived cost, perceived value, and current teaching practices between the three different groups of teachers. In this study, the results revealed no statistical significant difference, as third, fourth, and fifth grade teachers have similar perceptions of cooperative learning. Additionally, the participants had similar scores for Current Teaching Practices, H(2) = 0.31, p = 0.86, and Teacher Perceptions, H(2) = 0.27, p = 0.87. The study did reveal teachers with prior training in cooperative learning were most likely to implement it.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer