It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As countries in Europe implement strategies to control the COVID-19 pandemic, different options are chosen regarding schools. Through a stochastic age-structured transmission model calibrated to the observed epidemic in Île-de-France in the first wave, we explored scenarios of partial, progressive, or full school reopening. Given the uncertainty on children’s role, we found that reopening schools after lockdown may increase COVID-19 cases, yet protocols exist to keep the epidemic controlled. Under a scenario with stable epidemic activity if schools were closed, reopening pre-schools and primary schools would lead to up to 76% [67, 84]% occupation of ICU beds if no other school level reopened, or if middle and high schools reopened later. Immediately reopening all school levels may overwhelm the ICU system. Priority should be given to pre- and primary schools allowing younger children to resume learning and development, whereas full attendance in middle and high schools is not recommended for stable or increasing epidemic activity. Large-scale test and trace is required to keep the epidemic under control. Ex-post assessment shows that progressive reopening of schools, limited attendance, and strong adoption of preventive measures contributed to a decreasing epidemic after lifting the first lockdown.
The role of children in the spread of COVID-19 is not fully understood, and the circumstances under which schools should be opened are therefore debated. Here, the authors demonstrate protocols by which schools in France can be safely opened without overwhelming the healthcare system.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (GRID:grid.503257.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9776 8518)
2 Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (GRID:grid.503257.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9776 8518); Sociology and Economics of Network and Services (SENSE), Orange Labs, Chatillon, France (GRID:grid.89485.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 0600 5611)
3 Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France (GRID:grid.503257.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9776 8518); Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)