It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite China’s emissions having plateaued in 2013, it is still the world’s leading energy consumer and CO2 emitter, accounting for approximately 30% of global emissions. Detailed CO2 emission inventories by energy and sector have great significance to China’s carbon policies as well as to achieving global climate change mitigation targets. This study constructs the most up-to-date CO2 emission inventories for China and its 30 provinces, as well as their energy inventories for the years 2016 and 2017. The newly compiled inventories provide key updates and supplements to our previous emission dataset for 1997–2015. Emissions are calculated based on IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) administrative territorial scope that covers all anthropogenic emissions generated within an administrative boundary due to energy consumption (i.e. energy-related emissions from 17 fossil fuel types) and industrial production (i.e. process-related emissions from cement production). The inventories are constructed for 47 economic sectors consistent with the national economic accounting system. The data can be used as inputs to climate and integrated assessment models and for analysis of emission patterns of China and its regions.
Measurement(s) | carbon dioxide emission • anthropogenic generation of energy |
Technology Type(s) | computational modeling technique |
Factor Type(s) | year of carbon dioxide emissions |
Sample Characteristic - Environment | anthropogenic environment |
Sample Characteristic - Location | China |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Groningen, Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (GRID:grid.4830.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 1981)
2 Shandong University, Institute of Blue and Green Development, Weihai, China (GRID:grid.27255.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 1174)
3 Tsinghua University, Department of Earth System Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178); University of East Anglia, School of International Development, Norwich, UK (GRID:grid.8273.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1092 7967)
4 University of Groningen, Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (GRID:grid.4830.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 1981); Masaryk University, Department of Environmental Studies, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.10267.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 0956)