It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Credit cards have often been blamed for consumer overspending and for the growth in household debt. Indeed, laboratory studies of purchase behavior have shown that credit cards can facilitate spending in ways that are difficult to justify on purely financial grounds. However, the psychological mechanisms behind this spending facilitation effect remain conjectural. A leading hypothesis is that credit cards reduce the pain of payment and so ‘release the brakes’ that hold expenditures in check. Alternatively, credit cards could provide a ‘step on the gas,’ increasing motivation to spend. Here we present the first evidence of differences in brain activation in the presence of real credit and cash purchase opportunities. In an fMRI shopping task, participants purchased items tailored to their interests, either by using a personal credit card or their own cash. Credit card purchases were associated with strong activation in the striatum, which coincided with onset of the credit card cue and was not related to product price. In contrast, reward network activation weakly predicted cash purchases, and only among relatively cheaper items. The presence of reward network activation differences highlights the potential neural impact of novel payment instruments in stimulating spending—these fundamental reward mechanisms could be exploited by new payment methods as we transition to a purely cashless society.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Utah, Eccles School of Business, Salt Lake City, USA (GRID:grid.223827.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 0096); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sloan Neuroeconomics Laboratory, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sloan Neuroeconomics Laboratory, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sloan Neuroeconomics Laboratory, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)