It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Bud-break is an economically and environmentally important process in trees and shrubs from boreal and temperate latitudes, but its molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we show that two previously reported transcription factors, EARLY BUD BREAK 1 (EBB1) and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE-Like (SVL) directly interact to control bud-break. EBB1 is a positive regulator of bud-break, whereas SVL is a negative regulator of bud-break. EBB1 directly and negatively regulates SVL expression. We further report the identification and characterization of the EBB3 gene. EBB3 is a temperature-responsive, epigenetically-regulated, positive regulator of bud-break that provides a direct link to activation of the cell cycle during bud-break. EBB3 is an AP2/ERF transcription factor that positively and directly regulates CYCLIND3.1 gene. Our results reveal the architecture of a putative regulatory module that links temperature-mediated control of bud-break with activation of cell cycle.
An AP2/ERF family gene EBB1 and a MADS-box gene SVL encode two regulators of poplar bud break. Here, the authors report another AP2/ERF transcription factor EBB3, which functions together with EBB1, SVL, and cell cycle progression promoter CYCD3.1 to regulate poplar bud break.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Michigan Technological University, College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Houghton, USA (GRID:grid.259979.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0663 5937)
2 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå, Sweden (GRID:grid.6341.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 8578 2742); CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Palampur, India (GRID:grid.417640.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0500 553X)
3 Michigan Technological University, College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Houghton, USA (GRID:grid.259979.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0663 5937); Eastern Illinois University, Department of Biological Sciences, Charleston, USA (GRID:grid.255392.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7777)
4 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå, Sweden (GRID:grid.6341.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 8578 2742)
5 Oregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)