INTRODUCTION:
In recent years, Brazil has been consolidated as one of the major global suppliers of animal protein, including beef, pork, or poultry; it is the world’s largest exporter of beef and chicken and ranks fourth in pork production and exports, according to the Brazilian Animal Protein Association (ABPA, 2018).
Approximately 81.5% of the pork produced in Brazil is intended for the domestic market, and the surplus is exported to countries such as Singapore, Hong Kong, China, and Russia, representing approximately 18.5% of world exports (ABPA, 2018). However, important trading partners such as China and Russia have restricted the purchase of animals fed with ractopamine.
Ractopamine is used in more than 20 countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia, and almost all of Latin America (FERREIRA et al., 2011) to decrease the rate of lipid deposition and increase the amount of lean meat in carcasses, two characteristics expected by the consumer market.
People worldwide are concerned about obesity, which is associated with the onset of many conditions, especially cardiovascular diseases (SANTOS et al., 2013). Many articles in the literature suggested that coconut and safflower oils are efficientin reducing body fat in humans and Wistar rats (ASSUNçAtilde;O et al., 2009; LIAU et al., 2011; CAMPANELLA et al., 2014).
Safflower oil is rich in long-chain fatty acids, especially omega-6 fatty acids, and has thermogenic properties that can increase satiety (CAMPANELLA et al., 2014). Coconut oil contains medium-chain fatty acids, which are absorbed and used in metabolic processes and not deposited in adipocytes (FIGUEIREDO-SILVA, 2012).
Studies by BLANKSON et al. (2000) using safflower oil in animal diets showed increased lean mass and decreased body fat, in addition to reducing glycerol and triacylglycerol concentration and markedly decreasing fat mass in obese humans. ASSUNçAtilde;O et at. (2009) studied the effect of coconut oil on humans and reported decreased abdominal fat. In this context, the objective of this research was to evaluate the substitution of ractopamine supplementation by safflower or coconut oil in finishing pig diets regarding performance, carcass quality, and carcass fatty acid profile.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
This study included 24 crossbred (Landrace × Large White × Pietrain) barrows with a mean weight of 78.00 ± 8.76 kg, distributed in a randomized block design by weight into four treatments [basal ration (BR), ractopamine, safflower oil, and coconut oil] and six replicates with one animal in each experimental unit, totaling 24 plots. The animals were kept in individual concrete-floored stalls measuring 2.76 × 1.85 m, with pacifier drinkers and semi-automatic feeders.
The experimental diets were formulated following the recommendations by ROSTAGNO et al. (2011). The basal diet was formulated with corn, soybean meal, vegetable oil, and commercial premix for finishing pigs, with treatments consisting of BR,BR + 10 ppm ractopamine, BR + four 1 g capsules of safflower oil, and BR + four 1 g capsules of coconut oil, as presented in table 1.
Table 1 Basal ration composition for finishing pigs.
Ingredient (%) | Basal ration |
Corn 7.8% | 73.1518 |
Soybean meal 45% | 15.1302 |
Wheat bran 15.1% | 6.4555 |
Premix1 | 3.0000 |
Soybean oil | 2.0000 |
L-Lysine | 0.2195 |
L-Threonine | 0.0431 |
Calculated values | 100 |
Crude protein (%) | 13.53 |
ME (Kcal/kg) | 3230 |
Available phosphorus (%) | 0.11 |
Sodium (%) | 0.15 |
Chlorine (%) | 0.04 |
Digestible lysine (%) | 0.72 |
Digestible methionine (%) | 0.23 |
Methionine + digestible cystine (%) | 0.41 |
Digestible threonine (%) | 0.48 |
Digestible tryptophan (%) | 0.13 |
Digestible valine (%) | 0.56 |
1Guarantee levels per kg of product: calcium (min) 235 g/kg; calcium (max) 240 g/kg; phosphorus (min) 34.67 g/kg; sodium (min) 585 g/kg; iron (min) 3.389 mg/kg; copper (min) 4.000 mg/kg; manganese (min) 1.333 mg/kg; zinc (min) 3.333 mg/kg; iodine (min) 33.33 mg/kg; cobalt (min) 6.86 mg/kg; selenium (min) 10 mg/kg; vitamin A (min) 116.800 IU/kg; vitamin D3 (min) 25.000 IU/kg; vitamin E (min) 833.33 IU/kg; vitamin K3 (min) 40 mg/kg; vitamin B1 (min) 16.7 mg/kg; vitamin B2 (min) 66.7 mg/kg; niacin (min) 500 mg/kg; pathogenicacid (min) 267 mg/kg; vitamin B6 (min) 16.7 mg/kg; folicacid (min) 5 mg/kg; biotin (min) 3.33 mg/kg; vitamin B12 (min) 333 mcg/kg; phytase 16.66 FTU/g; BHT 133 mg/kg; bacitracin (min) 1.883 mg/kg; choline (min) 3.338 mg/kg; andfluorine (max) 332 mg/kg.
The capsules were administered when the animals were fed, after an adaptation period of 2 days, considering the recommendation for humans of four capsules a day based on body weight (60 to 100 kg). The capsules were administered in two periods, two capsules at 8 am and two capsules at 4 pm, totaling four capsules a day, appropriate for the mean animal weight of 78 to 100 kg during the experimental period.
The animals were weighed at the beginning and end of the 28-day experiment for performance evaluation. All feed provided and feeder leftovers and waste were analyzed to estimate feed consumption and conversion and to calculate weight gain.
At the end of the experimental period, the animals were subjected to an 8-hour fast for solids and four allowed a pre-slaughter rest period, totaling a 12-hourfast. The animals were slaughtered following humane slaughter rules-stunned by electronarcosis; and subsequently, exsanguinated.
The carcasses were weighed to obtain the hot carcass weight (HCW), and the initial pH (45 min after slaughter) was measured in the longissimus dorsi muscle of the left half carcass using a portable pH meter with an insertion electrode. The carcasses were subsequently sawn in half and stored in a cold chamber for 24 h at approximately 4 ºC. After cooling, the carcasses were weighed to obtain the cold carcass weight (CCW). Weight loss during cooling was obtained from the difference between HCW and CCW. Then the final pH of the left half carcass was measured (24 h after slaughter), and carcass length was measured according to the Brazilian carcass classification method (ABCS, 1973). Carcass yield was calculated using the final weight in pre-transport fasting period, HCW, and CCW.
Rib eye (longissimus dorsi) area (REA) and fat area were determined using calipersto measure the sawn carcasses at the height of the last rib (P2) on a tracing paper drawing (ABCS, 1973). The meat: fat ratio was obtained by dividing the respective values of area.
Longissimus dorsi depth and fat thickness were measured at P2 at the junction of the last thoracic vertebra and the first lumbar vertebra, 6.5 cm from the midline of the carcass. The values of HCW, CCW, fat thickness (FT) at P2, and loin depth (LD) were used to calculate meat yield [60 − (FTP2× 0.058) + (LD× 0.1)] and the amount of meat in the carcass [(CCW× meat yield)/100] using the equations described by BRIDI & SILVA (2009).
Fat thickness was measured at three different points of the carcass using calipers-at the height of the first rib (FT1); at the height of the last rib (FT2), measured at the junction of the last thoracic vertebra and the first lumbar vertebra; and at the junction of the last two lumbar vertebrae (FT3), both measured perpendicularly to the dorsal-lumbar line. The mean fat thickness (MFT) of the carcass was calculated using the three fat measurements. Qualitative and pH parameters were assessed using muscle color and marbling, measured using the 0 to 6 scale recommended by the NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL (NPPC, 1999) and the MEAT EVALUATION HANDBOOK (2001).
Loin and fat samples were collected, identified, and sent to the Animal Nutrition Laboratory for fatty acid profile evaluation using gas chromatography, according to the methodology proposed by BLIGH & DYER (1959). After extraction, the material was saponified and subjected to methylation, according to the methodology reported by HARTMAN & LAGO (1973). Statistical Analysis System software (2004) was used to calculate the analysis of variance, and the means were compared using Duncan’s test at 5% probability.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The performance evaluation showed no effect on the initial weight, final weight, and daily feed intake (P>0.05), but there were effects on daily weight gain and feed conversion (P <0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2 Performance evaluation of barrows supplemented with ractopamine, safflower oil, and coconut oil.
Parameter (Kg) | ----------------------------------------------Treatment----------------------------------------- | P | ¹CV (%) | |||
Basal ration | Ractopamine | Safflower | Coconut | |||
Initial weight) | 79.333 | 79.500 | 78.500 | 77.833 | 0.75 | 3.78 |
Final weight) | 103.000 | 106.167 | 101.000 | 105.833 | 0.39 | 5.61 |
Daily consumption | 3.27 | 3.14 | 2.78 | 3.29 | 0.20 | 14.03 |
Daily weight gain | 0.92b | 1.06a | 0.91b | 1.01ab | 0.05 | 10.10 |
Feed conversion | 3.76a | 3.09b | 3.25b | 3.35ab | 0.05 | 11.43 |
Means followed by different letters on the same line are significantly different by Duncan’s test at 5% probability level. ¹CV: Coefficient of variation.
Animals that consumed a diet supplemented with ractopamine showed the highest values for daily weight gain, which did not differ from those shown by the animals supplemented with coconut oil. Animals receiving ractopamine and safflower oil supplementation showed the highest feed conversion values, which did not differ from the values observed in the animals supplemented with coconut oil.
Performance results showed that supplementation with oils was similarly effective in improving animal performance as ractopamine; therefore, it is possible to replace the chemical additive (ractopamine) with the natural additives.
Coconut oil is rich in medium-chain fatty acids that reduce body fat (ASSUNçAtilde;O et al., 2009; LIAU et al., 2011) and increase the proportion of lean mass in the carcass, justifying the increased weight gain of the animals evaluated. Improved feed conversion with the use of safflower oil may be associated with the thermogenic effect of this oil owing to the presence of long-chain fatty acids, which increase satiety (CAMPANELLA et al., 2014).
There were no differences (P>0.05) in carcass yield, carcass length, leg weight, FT1 and 2, MFT, FT at P2, LD, fat area, meat: fat ratio, meat yield, and amount of meat in the animals evaluated (Table 3).
Table 3 Mean carcass characteristics of pigs supplemented with ractopamine, safflower oil, and coconut oil.
Parameter | -----------------------------------Treatment------------------------------- | P | 1CV (%) | |||
Basal ration | Ractopamine | Safflower | Coconut | |||
Carcass yield (%) | 79.22 | 80.13 | 79.94 | 80.47 | 0.73 | 2.61 |
Carcass length (cm) | 99.67 | 99.67 | 98.17 | 99.17 | 0.89 | 3.78 |
Leg weight (kg) | 12.50 | 13.19 | 12.68 | 13.02 | 0.52 | 6.78 |
2FT1 (mm) | 4.17 | 4.19 | 3.66 | 4.19 | 0.13 | 10.79 |
3FT2 (mm) | 2.81 | 2.96 | 2.63 | 2.66 | 0.55 | 15.71 |
4FT3 (mm) | 2.79a | 2.55ab | 2.24b | 2.73ab | 0.05 | 16.09 |
5MFT (mm) | 3.26 | 3.23 | 2.85 | 3.19 | 0.13 | 10.13 |
6P2 (cm) | 1.92 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 1.77 | 0.34 | 22.72 |
7LD (cm2) | 5.63 | 6.28 | 5.83 | 6.07 | 0.21 | 8.88 |
8REA (mm2) | 40.34b | 47.53a | 43.18ab | 43.63ab | 0.05 | 11.68 |
Fat area (mm2) | 23.32 | 24.48 | 18.27 | 22.48 | 0.46 | 31.49 |
Meat:fat ratio (mm²) | 1.93 | 2.07 | 2.50 | 2.01 | 0.30 | 25.54 |
Meat yield (%) | 60.40 | 60.46 | 60.43 | 60.45 | 0.50 | 0.92 |
Amount of meat in the carcass (%) | 48.39 | 50.76 | 48.13 | 50.03 | 0.45 | 6.51 |
Means followed by different letters on the same line are significantly different by Duncan’s test at 5% probability level; ¹CV: Coefficient of variation;2FT1: fat thickness measured on the first rib; 3FT2: fat thickness measured on the last rib; 4FT3: fat thickness measured at the last lumbar vertebra; 4MFT: mean of fat thickness values FT1, FT2, and FT3; 6P2: fat thickness measured at 6.5 cm from the dorsal-lumbar line of the last rib; 7LD: loin depth measured in the longissimus dorsi muscle; 8REA: rib eye area.
Animals supplemented with safflower oil showed lower fat thickness (P<0.05), which did not differ from that observed in animals supplemented with ractopamine and coconut oil. This finding confirmed the effectiveness of the tested products in reducing fat deposition and the superiority of safflower oil among the treatments used, especially when considering fat thickness values (FT1 and 2, P2, and fat area);safflower oil supplementation, despite not having a significant effect, was the treatment that showed less fat deposition than the other treatments.
According to LUCAS et al. (2016), lower fat deposition with the use of safflower oil may be related to its composition; safflower oil contains approximately 70% linoleic acid, which may inhibit the action of the enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL) responsible for lipid deposition in adipocytes. OBSEN et al. (2012) state that a high amount of LPL in the body leads to high lipid storage in fat cells, and when the activity of this enzyme is blocked, lipid transfer into fat cells is inhibited, forcing the body to use its fat reserve as an energy source.
Ractopamine treatments resulted in higher REA values (P<0.05), with a similar effect observed in animals supplemented with coconut oil and safflower oil. ALMEIDA et al. (2010) reported that increased REA is associated with increased protein synthesis in skeletal muscles and decreased amino acid catabolism. This response associated with ractopamine supplementation may be correlated with increased REA in pigs, suggesting that ractopamine supplementation results in carcasses with increased percentages of lean meat, decreased lipid synthesis in adipose tissue, and increased protein synthesis in muscles.
Considering that there was no difference in REA among animals treated with ractopamine, coconut oil, and safflower oil and that animals supplemented with coconut and safflower oils showed less fat deposition, these oils may have the potential to replace ractopamine.
There were no differences (P> 0.05) in the parameters meat quality, initial pH, final pH, color, marbling, water loss in cooling among any of the evaluated treatments (Table 4). A study by COSTA E SILVA et al. (2017) on the inclusion of 7.5 ppm of ractopamine in the diet of female, castrated, and immunocastrated pigs showed no differences in meat quality parameters.
Table 4 Mean carcass quality characteristics of pigs supplemented with ractopamine, safflower oil, and coconut oil: initial and final pH, initial temperature (ITEMP), final temperature (FTEMP), meat color and marbling (MAR), water loss by cooling (WLC).
Parameter | ------------------------------------------------Treatment--------------------------------------------- | P | 1CV (%) | |||
Basal ration | Ractopamine | Safflower | Coconut | |||
pH 45 min postmortem | 6.87 | 6.90 | 6.76 | 6.77 | 0.72 | 3.61 |
pH 24 h postmortem | 5.97 | 5.85 | 5.83 | 5.90 | 0.41 | 2.57 |
Color2 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 2.83 | 2.83 | 0.76 | 18.60 |
Marbling2 | 2.83 | 3.33 | 2.50 | 3.17 | 0.30 | 26.60 |
WLC (g) | 1.87 | 2.03 | 2.07 | 2.18 | 0.82 | 28.50 |
¹CV: Coefficient of variation;2 Scale of points from 1 to 6 by the NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL (NPPC, 1999) and MEAT EVALUATION HANDBOOK (2001).
Palmitoleic acid concentration in the loin differed (P<0.05) among treatments; the animals supplemented with coconut oil showed the highest palmitoleic acid concentrations compared to the reference diet, which did not differ from those in animals supplemented with safflower oil and ractopamine (Table 5).
Table 5 Fatty acid composition of the longissimus dorsi muscle and adipose tissue (fat) of pigs supplemented with ractopamine, safflower oil, and coconut oil.
Fatty acid (µg/g) | ----------------------------------------Treatment----------------------------------- | P | 1CV (%) | |||
Basal ration | Ractopamine | Safflower | Coconut | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Longissimus dorsi----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||||
Lauric (C12: 0) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.73 | 12.87 |
Myristic (C14: 0) | 1.16 | 1.14 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 0.34 | 14.38 |
Palmitic (C16: 0) | 23.41 | 24.27 | 24.99 | 24.71 | 0.30 | 6.02 |
Palmitoleic (C16: 1) | 2.58b | 2.74ab | 2.82ab | 3.25a | 0.05 | 16.81 |
Oleic (C18: 1n9) | 32.70b | 34.70ab | 38.79a | 36.63ab | 0.05 | 12.83 |
Linoleic (C18: 2n6) | 14.24 | 13.35 | 10.90 | 11.54 | 0.23 | 23.84 |
Linolenic (C18: 3n3) | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 27.15 |
Arachidonic (C20: 4n6) | 3.13 | 2.84 | 2.09 | 2.42 | 0.33 | 38.46 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------Fat tissue------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||||||
Lauric (C12: 0) | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 59.10 |
Myristic (C14: 0) | 1.47a | 1.32b | 1.33b | 1.49a | 0.05 | 6.27 |
Palmitic (C16: 0) | 19.09 | 19.16 | 17.36 | 17.55 | 0.77 | 21.27 |
Palmitoleic (C16: 1) | 1.76 | 1.52 | 1.59 | 1.78 | 0.24 | 15.27 |
Oleic (C18: 1n9) | 33.51 | 33.97 | 32.96 | 33.01 | 0.77 | 5.61 |
Linoleic (C18: 2n6) | 18.84 | 18.51 | 19.89 | 19.13 | 0.77 | 12.39 |
Linolenic (C18: 3n3) | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.86 | 45.67 |
Arachidonic (C20: 4n6) | 2.13 | 2.48 | 2.66 | 2.73 | 0.33 | 23.24 |
¹CV: Coefficient of variation; Means followed by different letters on the same line are significantly different by Duncan’s test at 5% probability level.
Palmitoleic acid, also known as ω7, is not synthesized by the human body; therefore, its dietary supplementation is necessary. It has recently been identified as a lipokine, a lipid hormone synthesized and secreted by adipose tissue in humans, acting as a hormonal signal in organs such as the liver and pancreas; increasing insulin sensitivity; modulating inflammatory and metabolic processes; and controlling systemic, lipid, and glucose metabolism (BOLSONI-LOPES et al., 2014). The authors also reported a potentiating of metabolic flow of energy pathways associated with inhibition of energy storage pathways, suggesting that C16:1 regulates lipolysis via a mechanism dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α, a subtype of receptors activated by peroxisome proliferators and linked to the hepatic oxidation of fatty acids.
Oleic acid concentrations in the loin also differed (P<0.05), with the animals supplemented with safflower oil showing the highest concentrations, which did not differ from those in the animals supplemented with coconut oil and with ractopamine.
The higher oleic acid concentration in the evaluated cut may be associated with the better use of safflower lipids by the body, considering that safflower oil contains 16 to 20% oleic acid (TONGUÇ et al., 2012), whereas coconut oil contains only 5.65% oleic acid, and soy oil (used in the basal diet and with ractopamine) contains 23% oleic acid.
As for the fatty acid profile of adipose tissue, a difference (P<0.05) was observed only in the myristic acid content, with lower deposition in pigs supplemented with safflower oil and ractopamine.
The BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY (SBC, 2013) stated that saturated fats, especially lauric, myristic and palmitic acid, must be moderately consumed, because these fatty acids have a high potential to increaseL DL-C and HDL-Cand are known as hypercholesterolemic agents. Moreover, a meta-analysis by MICHA AND MOZAFFARIAN (2010) showed that lauric acid has the highest effect on increasing the LDL-C fraction, followed by myristic and palmitic acids. Therefore, a diet containing lower levels of these acids is desirable.
CONCLUSION:
This study concluded that both coconut oil and safflower oil can be used to substitute ractopamine because they show similar effects on performance, carcass quality, and fatty acid profile.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education People (CAPES) for the granting of master’s and post-doctoral scholarships and enabling the project.
The project was approved by the Animals Ethics Committee (AEC) under no. 002/2016.
E-mail: [email protected]. * Corresponding author.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed equally for the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved of the final version.
Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (ABPA). Relatório anual, 2018. Available from: <Available from: http://abpa-br.com.br/storage/files/relatorio-anual-2018.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2019.
Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Suínos. Métodos Brasileiros de Classificação de Carcaça. Estância, RS: ABCS. 1973. 17p.
ALMEIDA, V. V. et al. Ractopamina, cromo-metionina e suas combinações como aditivos modificadores do metabolismo de suínos em crescimento e terminação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.39, n.9, p.1969-1977, 2010. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbz/v39n9/a15v39n9.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. ISSN 1806-9290.
ASSUNÇÃO, M. et al. Effects of dietary coconut oil on the biochemical and anthropometric profiles of women presenting abdominal obesity. Lipids, v.44, n.7, p.593-601, 2009. Available from: <Available from: https://aocs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1007/s11745-009-3306-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11745-009-3306-6.
BLANKSON, H. et al. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. The Journal of Nutrition, v.130, n.12, p.2943-2948, 2000. Available from: <Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/130/12/2943/4686248 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.12.2943.
BLIGH, E. G.; DYER, W. J.A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, v.37, n.8, p.911-917, 1959. Available from: <Available from: https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/o59-099 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019.
BOLSONI-LOPES, A. et al. Palmitoleic acid (n-7) increases white adipocytes GLUT4 content and glucose uptake in association with AMPK activation. Lipids in Health and Disease, v.13, p.199, 2014. Available from: <Available from: https://lipidworld.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1476-511X-13-199 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-199.
BRIDI. A. M.; SILVA. C. A. Evaluation of pork. Londrina. Midiograf, p.120, 2009.
CAMPANELLA, L. C. A. et al. Efeito da suplementação de óleo de cártamo sobre o peso corporal, perfil lipídico, glicídico e antioxidante de ratos wistar induzidos à obesidade. Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básicas Aplicadas, v.35, n.1, p.141-147, 2014. Available from: <Available from: http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/2921/1526 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. ISSN 1808-4532.
COSTA E SILVA, L. C. et al. Effects of ractopamine hydrochloride and immunological castration in pigs. Part 2: belly quality characteristics and fatty acid composition. Food Science and Technology, v.37, n.3, p.404-410, 2017. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cta/v37n3/0101-2061-cta-1678-457X12716.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.1590/1678-457X.12716.
FERREIRA, A. S. et al. Ractopamine for pigs: a review about nutritional requirements. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, v.9, p.276-285, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a6a/d2f5a0106c9c138617ece6ebbdc923136fb1.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. ISSN: 1814-8085.
FIGUEIREDO-SILVA, A. C. et al. Link between lipid metabolism and voluntary food intake in rainbow trout fed coconut oil rich in medium-chain TAG. British Journal of Nutrition, v.107, n.11, p.1714-1725, 2012. Available from: <Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/3D69AD40ADD273BA1082581A6DC42F73/S0007114511004739a.pdf/link_between_lipid_metabolism_and_voluntary_food_intake_in_rainbow_trout_fed_coconut_oil_rich_in_mediumchain_tag.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004739.
HARTMAN, L.; LAGO, R. C. Rapid preparation of fatty acid methyl esters from lipids.Laboratory Practice, v.22, n.7, p.475-476, 1973. Available from: <Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac60235a044 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019.
LIAU, K. M. et al. An open-label pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of virgin coconut oil in reducing visceral adiposity. ISRN Pharmacology, v.2011, 2011. Available from: <Available from: http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2011/949686.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.5402/2011/949686.
LUCAS, R. R. et al. Herbal medicines applied to obesity. Demetra: Food, Nutrition and Health, v.11, n.2, p.473-492, 2016. Available from: <file:///C:/Users/Andreza/Downloads/19154-91780-1-PB.pdf>. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.12957/demetra.2016.19154.
NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL. Pork quality standards, Des Moines, IA, 1999. Available from: <Available from: https://egashops.directedje.com/PorkStoreProducer/product-details.asp?ID=90&CID=18&P=1 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019.
OBSEN, T. et al. Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid decreases de novo lipid synthesis in human adipocytes. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, v.23, n.6, p.580-590, 2012. Available from: <Available from: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0955286311000891?token=64DFB3D07FDAAF7DD5B76CC46E5DF7C4E7A69D5236B248069F47B6F186359F1B5D6A4A9B1561A1BF63494E926712309A >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.02.014.
ROSTAGNO, H. S. et al. Tabelas Brasileiras de aves e suínos: Composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 3ed. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2011. 252p.
SANTOS, R. D. et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia: I Diretriz sobre o consumo de gorduras e saúde cardiovascular. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, v.100, n.1, p.1-40, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v100n1s3/v100n1s3a01.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. ISSN-0066-782X.
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia/SBC. V Diretriz brasileira de dislipidemias e prevenção da aterosclerose. Arquivo Brasileiro de Cardiologia, v.101, p.1-22, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v101n4s1/v101n4s1.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. ISSN-0066-782X.
TONGUÇ, M. et al. Changes in seed reserve composition during germination and initial seedling development of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Biology, v.36, n.1, p.107-112, 2012. Available from: <Available from: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/biology/issues/biy-12-36-1/biy-36-1-13-1012-164.pdf >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2019. doi: 10.3906/biy-1012-164.
Clara Viviane Silva da Costa1
José Aparecido Moreira2
Andreza Lourenço Marinho3
Natália Rocha Silva1
Myllena Emelly de Paiva Carmo1
Adriana Margarida Zambotto Ramalho3
Emerson Moreira Aguiar1
Janete Gouveia de Souza1
Elisanie Neiva Magalhães Teixeira1
1Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Animal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brasil.
2Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Animal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brasil.
3Programa Nacional de Pós-doutorado (PNPD/CAPES), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), 59080-110, Natal, RN, Brasil
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the substitution of ractopamine by coconut or safflower oil in finishing pig diets. The study included 24 crossbred barrows weighing 78.00 ± 8.76 kg distributed in a randomized block design with four treatments and six replicates composed of: basal ration (BR), BR + 10 ppm ractopamine, BR + four 1 g capsules of safflower oil, and BR + four 1 g capsules of coconut oil. Performance evaluation showed that safflower oil, ractopamine, and coconut oil supplementation had a significant effect (P < 0.05) on weight gain and feed conversion. Carcass-related variables were also affected by the treatments (P < 0.05), with fat thickness 3 (FT3) reduced by the use of safflower oil, ractopamine, and coconut oil. Rib eye area was positively affected (P < 0.05) by diet, with ractopamine, coconut oil, and safflower oil supplementation treatments showing higher values than control diet treatment. The diets also affected fatty acid profiles (P < 0.05), with decreased myristic acid content in animals supplemented with ractopamine and safflower oil and increased deposition of palmitoleic and oleic acids in animals supplemented with coconut oil and safflower oil, respectively. Results suggested that both safflower oil and coconut oil can be used as substitutes for ractopamine.