This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Reactive dyes play an important role in textile industries. However, they may cause serious environmental problems as they are often nonbiodegradable and toxic to aquatic systems due to their complex aromatic molecular structures [1]. Once being discharged to the environment without destructive treatment, these water-soluble dyes can remain for a long time and alter the quality of water bodies by preventing light penetration and hindering photosynthesis, thereby affecting the ecosystems [2]. Among reactive dyes, anthraquinone dyes contain reactive groups with reinforced structures, which makes them difficult to degrade naturally and can be bioaccumulative in animals [3]. For example, an estimated half-life of C.I. Reactive Blue 19 at pH 7.0 and 25°C based on kinetic studies is ca. 46 years [4]. The concern over the ecotoxicity of these reactive dyes has led to the need to develop more efficient methods for their remediation from industrial effluents before discharging to water bodies. Textile wastewater treatment is not only decolorizing but also degrading and mineralizing dye molecules.
Among technologies for dye treatment, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have attracted increasing attention due to their efficiency and ability to thoroughly remove pollutants from wastewater effluents. These AOPs base on the strong activity of in situ formed free radicals, among which the most common radical is
A photochemical-based AOP of textile wastewater containing RB19 dye has been studied using the UV/K2S2O8 system [5]. The results showed that only 50% of RB19 dye was removed after 5 hours in the dark system, while the UV-irradiated one gave a complete color removal in less than 30 min and 78.5% COD has been removed after 3 hours of irradiation time. The decolorization rate was fitted to the pseudo-first-order kinetic model regarding dye concentration. Another study on UV irradiation effect on RB19 decolorization conducted by Tehrani et al. who compared the RB19 decolorization efficiency by ozonation and UV-enhanced ozonation revealed that a UV irradiation by mercury lamp only increased COD removal efficiency, not the decolorization efficiency [6].
In advanced oxidation processes, besides
One of the major benefits of the oxidation process based on the peroxymonocarbonate system is its greenness toward the environment. As it can be prepared by mixing
The aim of this work was two‐fold: (i) to evaluate the effectiveness of in situ generated
2. Materials and Experimental Procedure
2.1. Chemicals and Apparatus
Reactive Blue 19 dye was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Other chemicals and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade and used as received without any further purification.
The RB19 degradations were monitored by measuring RB19 absorbance at 588 nm using a Biochrom Libra S60 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer. The degradation efficiency was calculated using the following equation: RB19 degradation (%) = (Co − Ct)/Co × 100%, where Co and Ct are the initial and remaining RB19 concentrations (ppm) at time t (min), respectively. These concentrations were determined using the standard curve Abs = (8.4 ± 0.1).103CRB19 (mg/L) (R2 = 0.999) with the LOD and LOQ of 0.7 and 2.3 mg/L, respectively. pH values were measured by a Lab850 pH meter (with BlueLine 14 pH electrode). COD values were determined by the oxidation standard method [11]. Total carbon and total inorganic carbon were measured on a multi-N/C 2100 TOC analyser (Analytik Jena AG). A Shimadzu RP-HPLC equipped with a PDA-M20A detector was used to investigate the products of the degradation. A mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer at pH of 4.7 (50/50, v/v) was used as a mobile phase with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, an injection volume of 20 μL, and an oven temperature of 40°C.
2.2. Experimental Procedure
2.2.1. In Situ Peroxymonocarbonate Preparation
Peroxymonocarbonate (
2.2.2. Degradation of RB19 by In Situ Generated
The effects of different parameters on the RB19 degradation were investigated as described in Table 1 including the metallic ion catalyst (trials 1–9), the pH (trials 10–13), the
Table 1
Conditions for RB19 decolorization by peroxymonocarbonate.
| Trial | pH | [ | [ | [M2+] catalyst (mg/L) | UV irradiation |
| 1 | 8 | 10 | 20 | — | No |
| 2–5 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 0.1 (Ni2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Co2+) | No |
| 6 | 8 | — | 200 | — | No |
| 7 | 8 | — | 200 | 0.1 (Co2+) | No |
| 8 | 8 | 100 | 200 | — | No |
| 9 | 8 | 100 | 200 | 0.1 (Co2+) | No |
| 10–13 | 7, 8, 9, 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.1 (Co2+) | No |
| 14–18 | 8 | 5, 10, 15, 25, 30 | 40 | 0.1 (Co2+) | No |
| 19–22 | 8 | 20 | 40 | 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 (Co2+) | No |
| 23 | 8 | — | — | — | No |
| 24 | 8 | — | — | — | Yes |
| 25 | 8 | — | 20 | — | Yes |
| 26 | 8 | — | 20 | 0.1 (Co2+) | Yes |
| 27 | 8 | 10 | 20 | — | Yes |
| 28 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 0.1 (Co2+) | Yes |
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Formation of Peroxymonocarbonate
The peroxymonocarbonate ion was produced in situ by the reaction of
To determine the maximum formation of
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Therefore, the dye decolorization experiments by the
3.2. RB19 Degradation by
3.2.1. Effect of Metallic Ion Catalysts
The effect of metallic ion catalysts (i.e., Ni2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, and Co2+) was investigated by performing trials 1–5 (Table 1). The result shown in Figure 3 reveals the most significant effect of Co2+ on the degradation of RB19 by the
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
To clarify the role of Co2+ in the RB19 degradation by the
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Co3+ is then reduced to regenerate Co2+:
These radicals then react with the organic compounds through many steps and eventually form CO2 and H2O. The oxidation process of organic compounds occurs continuously with a crucial role of the Co2+/Co3+ redox couple.
3.2.2. Effect of pH
The effect of pH was investigated by varying pH values from 7 to 10 and keeping constant other parameters (trials 10–13). The result shown in Figure 5 revealed that the increase in pH value causes faster dye degradation. However, the
3.2.3. Effect of
To study the effect of
It can be seen from Figure 6(a) that RB19 degradation efficiency and rate remarkably increase with an increase in
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
Similarly, Figure 7(a) shows a proportional relationship between the Co2+ concentration and the RB19 degradation efficiency and reaction rate. The reason for this may be the increase in Co2+ complexes as mentioned above.
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
The plots of
The reaction rate of RB19 degradation was assumed to be the pseudo-first-order kinetics with respect to RB19 as the following expression:
Integrating (7) gives (6):
The pseudo-first-order rate constants, k1 (min−1), were calculated from the slope of the plots of ln (Co/Ct) vs. time t and subsequently used to calculate the experimental order of
(1) Order of
From equation (8),
Taking the logarithm of both sides of (9) gives
(2) Order of Co2+. Similarly, the order of Co2+ was determined when changing [Co2+] and keeping concentrations of other species constant.
Taking the logarithm of both sides of (11) gives
The experimental orders of
Table 2
Experimental data for determining the orders of HCO3– and Co2+ in RB19 degradation.
| [ | k1 | lnk1 | [Co2+] | ln[Co2+] | k1 | lnk1 | |
| 5 | 0.699 | 0.004 | −2.420 | 0.01 | −4.605 | 0.0026 | −5.952 |
| 10 | 1.000 | 0.012 | −1.921 | 0.02 | −3.912 | 0.0046 | −5.382 |
| 15 | 1.176 | 0.018 | −1.750 | 0.04 | −3.219 | 0.0137 | −4.290 |
| 25 | 1.398 | 0.052 | −1.286 | 0.06 | −2.813 | 0.0211 | −3.858 |
| 30 | 1.477 | 0.080 | −1.095 | ||||
| lnk1 = 1.7 ln[HCO3–]−3.6 | lnk1 = 1.2 ln[Co2+]−0.5 | ||||||
3.2.4. Effect of UV Irradiation on the RB19 Degradation
The degradation of RB19 with the selected oxidation system (
Table 3
The effect of UV irradiation on the RB19 degradation.
| Oxidation system | RB19 degradation efficiency at 30 min reaction time (%) | |
| Non-UV irradiation | UV irradiation | |
| RB19 | 0.0 | 3.7 ± 0.3 |
| RB19-H2O2 | 0.0 | 83.6 ± 3.6 |
| RB19-H2O2-Co2+ | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 91.1 ± 2.9 |
| RB19-H2O2-HCO3– | 4.7 ± 2.7 | 96.7 ± 2.3 |
| RB19-H2O2-HCO3–-Co2+ | 79.9 ± 3.5 | 97.6 ± 3.1 |
3.3. Products of the RB19 Degradation
The COD values of the initial and final reaction solutions in which RB19 (0.1 g/L) was decomposed by the
Table 4
Determination of COD and TOC of RB19 degradation.
| COD (mg O2/L) | TC (mg/L) | TIC (mg/L) | TOC (mg/L) | |
| 315 ± 0.5 | — | — | — | |
| 12.5 ± 0.3 | 141.5 ± 0.9 | 126.2 ± 0.9 | 15.3 ± 0.2 |
These results suggest a good mineralization of RB19 by the
Moreover, the RP-HPLC chromatograms of the RB19 degradation solutions using
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Conclusions
In the present work, the degradation efficiency of RB19 reactive dye has been proved to be strongly affected by the
Acknowledgments
This work was supported financially by the project of Ministry of Education and Training, under B2019-SPH-08 project.
[1] L. R. Pereira, M. S. Alves, "Dyes–environmental impact and remediation," Environmental Protection Strategies for Sustainable Development, 2012.
[2] E. Routoula, S. V. Patwardhan, "Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: a review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54 no. 2, pp. 647-664, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03737, 2020.
[3] I. G. Laing, "The impact of effluent regulations on the dyeing industry," Review of Progress in Coloration and Related Topics, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 56-71, 1991.
[4] E. J. Weber, V. C. Stickney, "Hydrolysis kinetics of reactive Blue 19-vinyl sulfone," Water Research, vol. 27 no. 1, pp. 63-67, DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90195-n, 1993.
[5] A. Rezaee, M. T. Ghaneian, A. Khavanin, "Photochemical oxidation of Reactive Blue 19 dye (RB19) in textile wastewater by UV/K 2 S 2 O 8 process," Iran Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, vol. 5 no. 2, pp. 95-100, 2008.
[6] A. R. Tehrani, F. L. Amini, "Decolorization of a reactive dye by UV-enhanced ozonation," Progress in Color, Colorants and Coatings, vol. 3 no. 1, 2010.
[7] M. Viisimaa, A. Goi, "Use of hydrogen peroxide and percarbonate to treat chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil," Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 22 no. 1, pp. 30-39, DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2013.804827, 2014.
[8] D. E. Richardson, H. Yao, K. M. Frank, D. A. Bennett, "Equilibria, kinetics, and mechanism in the bicarbonate activation of hydrogen peroxide: oxidation of sulfides by peroxymonocarbonate," Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 122 no. 8, pp. 1729-1739, DOI: 10.1021/ja9927467, 2000.
[9] B. Balagam, D. E. Richardson, "The mechanism of carbon dioxide catalysis in the hydrogen peroxide N-oxidation of amines," Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 47 no. 3, pp. 1173-1178, DOI: 10.1021/ic701402h, 2008.
[10] C. A. S. Regino, D. E. Richardson, "Bicarbonate-catalyzed hydrogen peroxide oxidation of cysteine and related thiols," Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 360 no. 14, pp. 3971-3977, DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2007.05.020, 2007.
[11] TCVN 6491, Water Quality-Determination of the Chemical Oxigen Demand, Directorate for Standards, Metrology and Quality of Viet Nam, 1999.
[12] B. D. Sully, P. L. Williams, "The analysis of solutions of per-acids and hydrogen peroxide," The Analyst, vol. 87 no. 1037, pp. 653-657, DOI: 10.1039/an9628700653, 1962.
[13] E. V. Bakhmutova-Albert, H. Yao, D. E. Denevan, D. E. Richardson, "Kinetics and mechanism of peroxymonocarbonate formation," Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 49 no. 24, pp. 11287-11296, DOI: 10.1021/ic1007389, 2010.
[14] G. P. Anipsitakis, D. D. Dionysiou, M. A. Gonzalez, "Cobalt-mediated activation of peroxymonosulfate and sulfate radical attack on phenolic compounds. Implications of chloride ions," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40 no. 3, pp. 1000-1007, DOI: 10.1021/es050634b, 2006.
[15] J. Kim, P. Du, W. Liu, C. Luo, H. Zhao, C.-H. Huang, "Cobalt/Peracetic acid: advanced oxidation of aromatic organic compounds by acetylperoxyl radicals," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54 no. 8, pp. 5268-5278, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00356, 2020.
[16] A. Rubio-Clemente, E. Chica, G. A. Penuela, "Kinetic modeling of the UV/H 2 O 2 process: determining the effective hydroxyl radical concentration," Physico-Chemical Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery, 2017.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2021 Thi Bich Viet Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
The effectiveness of peroxymonocarbonate (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Nguyen-Bich, Ngan 1 ; Vu, Ngoc Duy 2 ; Hien Ho Phuong 1 ; Hanh Nguyen Thi 3 1 Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
2 Faculty of Chemistry, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 19 Le Thanh Tong, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam; Research Center for Environmental Technology and Sustainable Development, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
3 Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam; Department of Chemistry, Hanoi Pedagogical University 2, 32 Nguyen Van Linh, Phuc Yen, Vinh Phuc 15000, Vietnam





