It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Small, private colleges in the United States provide students with close-knit and individualized college experiences. However, these institutions are increasingly vulnerable to closures, mergers, and acquisitions due to economic downturns, enrollment challenges, and many other internal and external factors. Compared to their larger public and private wealthier counterparts, small colleges do not have the reputational clout, endowment size, public support, or enrollment supply to protect them from institutional instability and potential demise. The existing literature focuses on the financial viability of small colleges, but research also suggests that institutions should also examine the effect of nonfinancial variables on overall institutional health. With a conceptual framework synthesized from the research on institutional viability and health, this study addressed the relationships between the equity ratio and six financial and nonfinancial variables (i.e., endowment assets per full-time equivalent, debt-to-asset ratio, tuition discount rate, undergraduate enrollment, student-to-faculty ratio, and degrees conferred) for 646 four-year, private colleges with fewer than 4,000 students between FY12 and FY17 in the United States. Descriptive analysis was the means used to examine the changes in the independent variables compared to changes in the equity ratios for these institutions between FY12 and FY17. A bivariate correlational analysis commenced exploring the relationships between the dependent variable (equity ratio) and the six independent variables and their relationships with each other. There was an institutional health measure created for 627 of the small colleges in the study. Finally, there were descriptive analyses conducted for four small colleges that had undergone closures, near closures, or mergers or acquisitions. The study showed that the equity scores for most of the small colleges remained stable or improved over 5 years, indicating financial stability. However, the descriptive analyses indicated increased tuition discount rates, decreased endowment assets per full-time equivalent, and decreased student enrollment at many institutions, indicating concerns about their viability. The correlational analysis showed that only one variable (debt-to-asset ratio) had a statistically significant relationship with the equity ratio; this indicated that the other independent variables presented unique, meaningful information not included in the equity ratio. Finally, the descriptive analysis showed that three of the four small colleges had high equity ratio, financial responsibility, and CFI scores, indicating that the equity ratio and other financial indicators did not provide a meaningful enough assessment of institutional viability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





