It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
The intermediate‐term effects of dietary protein on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus are unknown. We compared the effect of two calorie‐restricted diets on cardiometabolic risk factors in this population.
Methods and results
In this randomized controlled study, 76 overweight and obese (mean weight, 107.8 ± 20.8 kg) patients aged 57.7 ± 9.7 years, 72.4% male, were randomized to a high‐protein (30% protein, 40% carbohydrates, and 30% fat) or standard‐protein diet (15% protein, 55% carbohydrates, and 30% fat) for 3 months. Reductions in weight and cardiometabolic risks were evaluated at 3 months. Both diets were equally effective in reducing weight (3.6 vs. 2.9 kg) and waist circumference (1.9 vs. 1.3 cm), but the high‐protein diet decreased to a greater extent glycosylated haemoglobin levels (0.7% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.002), cholesterol (16.8 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, P = 0.031), and triglyceride (25.7 vs. 5.7 mg/dL, P = 0.032), when compared with the standard‐protein diet. The high‐protein diet also significantly improved both systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the standard‐protein diet (P < 0.001 and P = 0.040, respectively).
Conclusions
Both energy‐restricted diets reduced weight and visceral fat. However, the high‐protein diet resulted in greater reductions in cardiometabolic risks relative to a standard‐protein diet. These results suggest that a high‐protein diet may be more effective in reducing cardiometabolic risk in this population, but further trials of longer duration are needed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Nursing, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
2 Diabetes Prevention and Care Program, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
4 Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Heart Failure Program, Cedars‐Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
5 Ahmanson‐UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center and Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA





