It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Filial imprinting has become a model for understanding memory, learning and social behaviour in neonate animals. This mechanism allows the youngs of precocial bird species to learn the characteristics of conspicuous visual stimuli and display affiliative response to them. Although longer exposures to an object produce stronger preferences for it afterwards, this relation is not linear. Sometimes, chicks even prefer to approach novel rather than familiar objects. To date, little is known about how filial preferences develop across time. This study aimed to investigate filial preferences for familiar and novel imprinting objects over time. After hatching, chicks were individually placed in an arena where stimuli were displayed on two opposite screens. Using an automated setup, the duration of exposure and the type of stimuli were manipulated while the time spent at the imprinting stimulus was monitored across 6 days. We showed that prolonged exposure (3 days vs 1 day) to a stimulus produced robust filial imprinting preferences. Interestingly, with a shorter exposure (1 day), animals re-evaluated their filial preferences in functions of their spontaneous preferences and past experiences. Our study suggests that predispositions influence learning when the imprinting memories are not fully consolidated, driving animal preferences toward more predisposed stimuli.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Trento, Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, Trento, Italy (GRID:grid.11696.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0351)
2 University of Trento, Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, Trento, Italy (GRID:grid.11696.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0351); University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Psychology, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.7563.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 1754)
3 University of Trento, Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, Trento, Italy (GRID:grid.11696.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0351); University of Lyon 2, Laboratory Dynamique du Language, Lyon, France (GRID:grid.25697.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 4233)
4 University of Trento, Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, Trento, Italy (GRID:grid.11696.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0351); Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133)