It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Population growth, urbanization and economic development drive the use of resources. Securing access to essential services such as energy, water, and food, while achieving sustainable development, require that policy and planning processes follow an integrated approach. The ‘Climate-, Land-, Energy- and Water-systems’ (CLEWs) framework assists the exploration of interactions between (and within) CLEW systems via quantitative means. The approach was first introduced by the International Atomic Energy Agency to conduct an integrated systems analysis of a biofuel chain. The framework assists the exploration of interactions between (and within) CLEW systems via quantitative means. Its multi-institutional application to the case of Mauritius in 2012 initiated the deployment of the framework. A vast number of completed and ongoing applications of CLEWs span different spatial and temporal scales, discussing two or more resource interactions under different political contexts. Also, the studies vary in purpose. This shapes the methods that support CLEWs-type analyses. In this paper, we detail the main steps of the CLEWs framework in perspective to its application over the years. We summarise and compare key applications, both published in the scientific literature, as working papers and reports by international organizations. We discuss differences in terms of geographic scope, purpose, interactions represented, analytical approach and stakeholder involvement. In addition, we review other assessments, which contributed to the advancement of the CLEWs framework. The paper delivers recommendations for the future development of the framework, as well as keys to success in this type of evaluations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Department of Energy Technology, KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Department Two, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
3 The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
4 World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
5 Environment Division, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Geneva, Switzerland
6 Carbon Delta, MSCI, Zurich, Switzerland
7 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), Development Policy and Analysis Division, New York, United States of America
8 Jefatura de Gobierno de la Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
9 Simon Fraser University (SFU), Vancouver, Canada
10 School of Electrical Engineering, University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
11 Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Boston, MA, United States of America
12 Department of Energy Technology, KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria