It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In India, construction is the second largest industry next to agriculture, with respect to its contribution to the economy of our country. Construction sector consumes a lot of energy throughout the life cycle of the buildings and contributes immensely to the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. Considerable amount of water is being consumed during the construction activities. It is found that In-dia’s water table is decreasing, Hence, there is a need to bring down en-ergy consumption and conservation and harvesting of water by implementing green and zero energy concepts. Net zero energy building is defined as a building with zero dependence on external source of energy. The main aim of this study is “Planning, analyzing and designing a 5 floor apartment building by implementing zero energy concepts and techniques”. Planning has been carried out by taking into account, the orientation aspects. Planning and plotting of the structure has been car-ried out using AutoCAD. Further analysis is done in STAAD Pro V8i and Cype taking the design loads for both zero energy and conventional building. Energy saving components such as rainwater harvesting system, solar panels, biogas plant, and wind energy and sewage treat-ment plant have been implemented as per standards. The dependence on external energy source is reduced by making use of the alternative energy sources such as solar PV panels, biogas and wind turbine there by making it economical environmental friendly. Estimation of the materials based on the drawings and specifications is carried out. Lastly, a comparative study of conventional versus zero energy building is done by performing cost benefit analysis of solar panel system.By using rainwater harvesting system the water bills reduced by 27% annually and by installing a solar panel with a capacity of 233 Kw/h led to the energy savings by 20 % annually. Also from the cost estima-tion, the payback period for green building was approximately 2.9 years for solar power.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ramaiah University of Applied sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India





