It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Knowledge regarding genetic diversity and population structure of breeding materials is essential for crop improvement. The Texas A&M University Potato Breeding Program has a collection of advanced clones selected and maintained in-vitro over a 40-year period. Little is known about its genetic makeup and usefulness for the current breeding program. In this study, 214 potato clones were genotyped with the Infinium Illumina 22 K V3 Potato Array. After filtering, a total of 10,106 single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers were used for analysis. Heterozygosity varied by SNP, with an overall average of 0.59. Three groups of tetraploid clones primarily based on potato market classes, were detected using STRUCTURE software and confirmed by discriminant analysis of principal components. The highest coefficient of differentiation observed between the groups was 0.14. Signatures of selection were uncovered in genes controlling potato flesh and skin color, length of plant cycle and tuberization, and carbohydrate metabolism. A core set of 43 clones was obtained using Core Hunter 3 to develop a sub-collection that retains similar genetic diversity as the whole population, minimize redundancies, and facilitates long-term conservation of genetic resources. The comprehensive molecular characterization of our breeding clone bank collection contributes to understanding the genetic diversity of existing potato resources. This analysis could be applied to other breeding programs and assist in the selection of parents, fingerprinting, protection, and management of the breeding collections.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Texas A&M University, Department of Horticultural Sciences, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
2 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
3 Michigan State University, Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2150 1785)
4 USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research, Aberdeen, USA (GRID:grid.507310.0)
5 North Dakota State University, Department of Plant Sciences, Fargo, USA (GRID:grid.261055.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2293 4611)
6 Colorado State University, San Luis Valley Research Center, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Center, USA (GRID:grid.47894.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8083)