Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) using the Readout Segmentation of Long Variable Echo-trains (RESOLVE) sequence in detecting lumbosacral nerve abnormalities.
Methods
Following institutional ethics committee approval, patients with sciatica-type lower limb radicular symptoms (n = 110) were recruited and prospectively scanned using 3T MRI. Additional participants (n = 17) who underwent neurophysiological testing (EMG/NCV), were also prospectively studied. In addition to routine lumbar spine MRI, a DWI-RESOLVE sequence of the lumbosacral plexus was performed. Two radiologists, blinded to the side of patient symptoms, independently evaluated the MR images. The size and signal intensity changes of the nerves were evaluated using ordinal 4-point Likert-scales. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and size were measured for affected and normal nerves. Inter-observer agreement was determined with kappa statistics; κ.
Results
In patients who did not undergo EMG/NCV testing (n = 110), the DWI-RESOLVE sequence detected lumbosacral nerve abnormalities that correlated with symptoms in 36.3% (40/110). This is a similar percentage to patients who underwent EMG/NCV testing, which was positive and correlated with symptoms in 41.2% (7/17). Inter-observer agreement for evaluation of lumbosacral nerve abnormalities was excellent and ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. SNR and nerve size measurements demonstrated statistically significant differences for the L5 and S1 nerves (p value < 0.05) for patients who did not undergo EMG/NCV testing.
Conclusion
The DWI-RESOLVE sequence is a promising new method that may permit accurate detection and localization of lumbar nerve abnormalities in patients with sciatica.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Taibah University, Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Madina, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.412892.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9358); University College Dublin, Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.7886.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0768 2743)
2 University College Dublin, Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.7886.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0768 2743)
3 Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.411596.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0488 8430)
4 Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Department of Neurophysiology, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.411596.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0488 8430)
5 Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.411596.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0488 8430); University College Dublin, School of Medicine, Dublin 4, Ireland (GRID:grid.7886.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0768 2743)