1. Introduction
Weeds are a threat in all cropping systems. These undesirable plants decrease input efficiency, interfere with agricultural practices, impair the quality of plant products, deplete resources such as soil nutrients, moisture, and space allocated to crop plants, and ultimately cause heavy losses in plant production [1]. It has been estimated that the economic damage of weeds is more than 100 billion dollars worldwide [2]. Therefore, eradicating or decreasing the harmful effects of weeds on crop plants is the main target of weed management.
Allelopathy is a natural process that can be considered as a tool for biological weed control in agriculture [3,4]. According to the International Allelopathy Society, allelopathy is defined as any process in which the secondary metabolites produced by plants affect the growth and development of biological systems [5]. Approximately 100,000 secondary metabolites have been identified to date in plants [6]. A smaller number of these are described as bioactive allelochemicals and are generally classified as members of specific chemical families that include phenolics, terpenoids, glycosteroids, and alkaloids [7]. These compounds are present in various concentrations in many plant parts, including leaves, stems, roots, flowers, seeds, rhizomes, pollen, bark, and buds [8], and are released through root exudates, leaching, volatilization, and decomposition of plant residues [9,10].
Several researchers have reported that some plant growth inhibitors from allelopathic plants can inhibit weed growth [11]. Consequently, allelopathic plants and allelochemicals can also be applied in the biological and non-synthetic chemical control of weeds; thus, introducing a new generation of environmentally friendly weed inhibitors and reducing the costs of crop productivity [12,13].
Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) is a summer annual C4 weed from the Portulacaceae family and is a very troublesome weed worldwide. This weed has been ranked as the 9th worst weed in the world, recorded in 45 crops in 81 countries [14]. It can severely decrease the yield of plants such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), and other vegetables [14]. This weed species has been identified as an allelopathic plant containing terpenes [15], tannins [16], saponins [17], alkaloids [18], phenolic acids, and flavonoids [19,20]. Silva et al. [21] indicated that leaves and roots of P. oleracea had detrimental effects on the germination and growth of Allium cepa L., Brassica oleracea L., Raphanus oleracea L., and S. lycopersicum. In addition, leaf and root aqueous extracts of P. oleracea adversely affected the activities of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthetic pigments of Cucurbita pepo L. So far, no study has reported the allelopathic effect of P. oleracea seeds on seed germination and seedling growth of other species. For this reason, the aim of the present study was to investigate the allelopathic effect of P. oleracea on seed germination and growth of Phaseous vulgaris L., A. cepa, Beta vulgaris L., Vicia faba L., and Pisum sativum L.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
In addition to P. oleracea seeds, common bean (P. vulgaris L. cv. Nassau), onion (A. cepa L. cv. Blanca de Pompei), beet (B. vulgaris cv. conditiva), broad bean (V. faba cv. Muchamiel.), and pea (P. sativum cv. Dulce de Provenza) seeds (Semillas Battle, Molins de Rei, Barcelona, Spain) were surface sterilized with hypochlorite (10%) and then soaked eight times with distilled water.
We collected matured seeds of P. oleracea from natural communities in Zanjan, Iran (36°41′ N and 48°23′ E; altitude 1634 m), which were stored at room temperatures (15–19 °C, 20–35% humidity) until the start of the experiment. Each replicate consisted of a Petri dish (11 cm diameter) with 25 seeds (only weed or only crop) or 50 seeds (weed + crop) on two layers of filter paper moistened with 3 mL of distilled water. Four replicates were established for each treatment combination and the Petri dishes were placed randomly within a climate-controlled room at 25 °C for 14 days with 12 h light per day. The crop seeds were placed at regular intervals between the weed seeds. Petri dishes with only weed or crop seeds were used as controls. The number of germinated seeds was recorded daily up to 14 days, and each seed was considered germinated when the protrusion of the radicle was visible [22].
Germination percentage was estimated by using the following equation:
GP = 100∗(NG/NT),
where NG is germinated seeds and NT is total seeds [23].The root and shoot length of all germinated seeds were measured using a metric ruler.
Seedling vigor index was evaluated with equation:
SVI = (s + r)G,
where s and r are the shoot and root length (in cm), respectively; G is the percentage of germination [24].Coefficient of allometry (CA) = radicle length/plumule length [25].
Inhibition (−) or stimulation (+) = GST − GSC/GSC∗100,
where GST is germination of seeds in treatments (seed close to seed); GSC is germination of seeds in control.2.2. Statistical Analysis
The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple-range tests (p ≤ 0.05). The Software SAS (Version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to conduct all the statistical analysis. Excel software was used to obtain figures.
3. Results
3.1. The Effect of P. oleracea on the Germination and Seedling Growth of Crop Species
The presence of P. oleracea caused differential responses in the germination percentage of crop species. The results revealed that the germination percentage of P. vulgaris and A. cepa seeds was reduced by the presence of P. oleracea seeds. In contrast, B. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum were not affected (Figure 1). The germination rates of P. vulgaris and A. cepa decreased marginally with the presence of P. oleracea, while B. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum were not influenced (Figure S1).
The proximity of P. oleracea strongly affected the root length of P. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum. The root length of these plants was reduced by 77%, 39%, and 34% in comparison with their respective controls. This weed species had the highest inhibitory effect on the root length of P. vulgaris. In contrast, variation of the root length of A. cepa and B. vulgaris was not influenced by the presence of P. oleracea (Figure 2).
Shoot length of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and V. faba was decreased by P. oleracea seeds. Among these crop species, P. oleracea had less effect on reducing the shoot length of A. cepa (Figure 3). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the shoot length of B. vulgaris and P. sativum grown with P. oleracea.
Seedling vigor of all crop species decreased in the presence of P. oleracea. This weed showed the highest inhibitory effect on seedling vigor of P. vulgaris (<60%), but the seedling vigor of A. cepa and B. vulgaris were also reduced in the presence of P. oleracea (Figure 4).
The coefficient of allometry of crop species was also affected by the presence of P. oleracea. The coefficient of allometry of P. vulgaris and P. sativum was negatively affected by the proximity of P. oleracea, but A. cepa and V. faba showed a comparably higher coefficient of allometry in the presence of P. oleracea, and the strongest increase was observed in V. faba (Figure 5).
3.2. The Effect of Crop Species on the Germination and Seedling Growth of P. oleracea
The seeds of A. cepa, B. vulgaris, and P. vulgaris exerted inhibitory influences on the germination percent of P. oleracea. In particular, A. cepa had the highest effect on P. oleracea germination of −13.5%. In contrast, the presence of P. sativum and V. faba had no effect on the germination of this weed (Figure 6). Additionally, the germination rate of P. oleracea was reduced by P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris (Figure S2). As a consequence, the proximity of P. vulgaris and A. cepa with P. oleracea exhibited a mutual inhibition (Figure S3).
The root length of P. oleracea decreased when grown in close proximity to all the crop species. The highest reduction was recorded in the presence of B. vulgaris (Figure 7).
The shoot length of P. oleracea, which was not affected by the presence of V. faba and P. vulgaris, was lower when grown near B. vulgaris and P. sativum. Additionally, the shoot length of P. oleracea was stimulated by the association with A. cepa (>29% compared to mono (Figure 8).
Similar to the root length results, the proximity of all crop seeds had a severe impact on the seedling vigor of P. oleracea. Among crop plants, the highest effect on seedling vigor of P. oleracea was observed by B. vulgaris (Figure 9) and the seedling vigor of P. oleracea had a small, but significant decrease grown in close proximity to P. sativum.
The presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, B. vulgaris, and V. faba strongly decreased the coefficient of allometry of P. oleracea. In contrast, the coefficient of allometry for P. oleracea did not differ from the control when this weed was grown with P. sativum (Figure 10).
4. Discussion
Reduced germination in A. cepa and P. vulgaris as a result of the allelopathic potential of P. oleracea indicated that this weed species probably possess allelochemicals which exhibited phytoinhibitory effects on these crops. Alkaloids from seeds of P. oleracea such as dopa, dopamine and noradrenaline [26], and monoterpenes are widely known to modify seed germination and seedling growth [27]. Furthermore, inhibition of seed germination may be attributed to the presence of inhibitory allelochemicals. The latter can exert inhibitory effects by affecting cell division and cell elongation [28], and mobilization of stored compounds [29]. Therefore, the cultivation of A. cepa and P. vulgaris is not recommended on the farms with P. oleracea. Among crop species, the germination of P. sativum, V. faba, and B. vulgaris in the presence of P. oleracea was not affected, because these plants were not influenced by P. oleracea. In contrast, the germination of P. oleracea decreased in the presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris. The basic approach used in allelopathic research for agricultural crops has been to screen both crop plants and natural vegetation for their capacity to suppress weeds. As a result, the allelopathic potential of these plants can be used to suppress P. oleracea. There are some phytochemical constituents in the seeds of P. vulgaris, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids, and saponins, which alter mitochondrial structure and function, leading to the inability of the cells to use the storage materials [30]. Dadkhah [31] reported that foliar aqueous extracts of B. vulgaris had significant herbicidal effects on seedling and plant growth of P. oleracea, and similar results were observed by El-Shora et al. [32]. According to our results, the presence of P. oleracea also strongly decreased the root length of crop plants. Since roots are sensitive to any chemical changes in their surroundings, they may respond more quickly. Reduced length in roots and shoots might be due to reduced cell division and abnormalities in growth hormones [18]. Alkaloids are among major allelopathic compounds in P. oleracea. Alkaloids have been observed to inhibit plant growth by several mechanisms, including interference with DNA, enzyme activity, protein biosynthesis, and membrane integrity in developing plants [33]. Flavonoids also affect the breakdown of auxin by IAA oxidases and peroxidases [34,35,36] and impact polar auxin transport [35,37,38], thereby affecting the root growth of target species. For example, flavonols identified from lettuce function as allelopathic inhibitors of seedling growth [39].
Seedling vigor was evaluated as a component of vegetative performance or fitness of a plant species. Seedling vigor of all crop species and P. oleracea significantly decreased in the presence of each other. These results are in agreement with those of Kiran et al. [40], who found that the aqueous extract of Psoralea corylifolia L. seeds decreased the seedling vigor of maize (Zea mays L.). Dhungana et al. [41] evaluated the allelopathic potential of soybean (Glycine max L.) root extract and maize on beggarticks (Bidens spp.) and goosegrass (Eleusine spp.), reporting that seedling vigor and weed germination were decreased.
The coefficient of allometry of P. oleracea decreased in the presence of crop species. Seeds of V. faba and P. vulgaris contain a high amount of phenolic compounds [42,43], potent inhibitors of cell division, able to decrease radicle and seedling growth [44], thus reducing the coefficient of allometry. Our results confirmed that the studied crop species can be categorized into two groups according to their sensitivity to the inhibitory potential of P. oleracea. The first group include P. vulgaris, B. vulgaris, and A. cepa, with a higher inhibitory activity on P. oleracea seed germination, and the second group represented by P. sativum and V. faba with no inhibitory effect on seed germination of the weed.
5. Conclusions
The allelopathic potential of P. oleracea was demonstrated against P. vulgaris and A. cepa plants. Since seed germination is a pivotal stage in the lifecycle of higher plants, the release of inhibitory substances from seeds of P. oleracea may impact the competitive ability of the neighboring plant or crop species during the establishment stage. On the other hand, seeds of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris exerted a higher reduction in the germination of P. oleracea. Therefore, aqueous extracts or selected allelochemicals of P. olearacea can be developed as bio-herbicides for controlling weeds, as well as some crop species with allelopathic potential can be used to suppress weeds, thereby decreasing synthetic herbicide dependency in conventional weed management [45].
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I.; methodology, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; formal analysis, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; investigation, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., S.V., and M.I.; supervision, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I.; funding acquisition, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the University of Zanjan, Iran and the University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Figure 1. Germination percent of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 2. Root length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 3. Shoot length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant differences between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 4. Seedling vigor of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 5. Coefficient of allometry of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 6. Percent germination of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 7. Root length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 8. Shoot length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 9. Seedling vigor of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 10. Coefficient of allelometry of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown toghether with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Allelopathy is described as the interference to plant growth resulting from chemical interactions among plants and other organisms mediated through the release of bioactive secondary metabolites. Since only a few studies have been reported about the role of seed allelopathy, an experiment was designed to evaluate the interactions among seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and the crop species common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), broad bean (Vicia faba L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) on seed and seedling growth parameters. The results indicated that P. oleracea seeds had a negative effect on the germination of P. vulgaris and A. cepa. Conversely, germination of P. oleracea in the presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris seeds was strongly reduced with a higher inhibitory effect found for the seeds of A. cepa. The highest negative effect on root and shoot length was observed in P. vulgaris. Seedling vigor of all crop species decreased in the presence of P. oleracea. Our results suggest that seeds of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris exhibited high allelopathic effects against seeds of P. oleracea and can be used as potential bio-herbicides in future screening programs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Department of Plant Production & Genetics, University of Zanjan, P.O. Box 4537138791, Zanjan 45195, Iran;
2 Department of Environmental Biology, Plant Stress Physiology Group, Associated to CSIC (EEAD, Zaragoza, ICVV, Logroño), Schools of Sciences and Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
3 Research Division of Natural Resources, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Centre, AREEO, Zanjan 45195, Iran;
4 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy;
5 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy;