It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To develop a tool for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer by combining inflammatory status and tumor glucose metabolic activity. This study included 127 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had received neoCRT followed by esophagectomy from 2007 to 2016. We collected their neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and standardized uptake value (SUV) obtained from fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET/CT) before and after neoCRT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictive factors for pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of predictors were calculated. Between pCR and non-pCR groups, there were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, such as sex, age, site, and clinical T/N stage. Multivariate analyses identified four independent predictors for pCR, including pre-OP NLR < 5.4 [OR 11.179; 95% CI 8.385–13.495; p = 0.003], NLR change (ΔNLR) < 3 [OR 4.891; 95% CI 2.274–9.180; p = 0.005], changes in SUV (ΔSUV) > 7.2 [OR 3.033; 95% CI 1.354–6.791; p = 0.007], and SUV changes ratio (ΔSUV ratio) > 58% [OR 3.585; 95% CI 1.576–8.152; p = 0.002]. ΔNLR had the highest accuracy and NPV (84.3% and 90.3%, respectively). Combined factors of ΔNLR < 3 and ΔSUV ratio > 58% had the best PPV for pCR (84.8%). Inflammatory status (ΔNLR) and tumor glucose metabolic activity (ΔSUV ratio), when considered together, constitute a promising low-invasive tool with high efficacy for prediction of treatment response before surgery.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.410764.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0731)
2 Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.410764.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0731); Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiayi City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.410764.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0731)
3 Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.410764.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0731)
4 Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.410764.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0731); National Chung Hsing University, Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.260542.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0532 3749)