It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The mechanisms leading to megafauna (>44 kg) extinctions in Late Pleistocene (126,000—12,000 years ago) Australia are highly contested because standard chronological analyses rely on scarce data of varying quality and ignore spatial complexity. Relevant archaeological and palaeontological records are most often also biased by differential preservation resulting in under-representated older events. Chronological analyses have attributed megafaunal extinctions to climate change, humans, or a combination of the two, but rarely consider spatial variation in extinction patterns, initial human appearance trajectories, and palaeoclimate change together. Here we develop a statistical approach to infer spatio-temporal trajectories of megafauna extirpations (local extinctions) and initial human appearance in south-eastern Australia. We identify a combined climate-human effect on regional extirpation patterns suggesting that small, mobile Aboriginal populations potentially needed access to drinkable water to survive arid ecosystems, but were simultaneously constrained by climate-dependent net landscape primary productivity. Thus, the co-drivers of megafauna extirpations were themselves constrained by the spatial distribution of climate-dependent water sources.
Whether Australia’s Pleistocene megafauna extinctions were caused by climate change, humans, or both is debated. Here, the authors infer the spatio-temporal trajectories of regional extinctions and find that water availability mediates the relationship among climate, human migration and megafauna extinctions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Flinders University, Global Ecology, College of Science and Engineering and ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia (GRID:grid.1014.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0367 2697)
2 UR 1052, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Montfavet, France (GRID:grid.414548.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 1988)
3 University of Tasmania, Dynamics of Eco-Evolutionary Pattern and ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Tasmania, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)
4 University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA (GRID:grid.410445.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 0957)
5 Institute for Basic Science, Center for Climate Physics, Busan, Korea (GRID:grid.410720.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1784 4496); Pusan National University, Busan, Korea (GRID:grid.262229.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0719 8572)
6 James Cook University, ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, College of Arts, Society and Education, Cairns, Australia (GRID:grid.1011.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0474 1797)