It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Metacognition comprises both the ability to be aware of one’s cognitive processes (metacognitive knowledge) and to regulate them (metacognitive control). Research in educational sciences has amassed a large body of evidence on the importance of metacognition in learning and academic achievement. More recently, metacognition has been studied from experimental and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. This research has started to identify brain regions that encode metacognitive processes. However, the educational and neuroscience disciplines have largely developed separately with little exchange and communication. In this article, we review the literature on metacognition in educational and cognitive neuroscience and identify entry points for synthesis. We argue that to improve our understanding of metacognition, future research needs to (i) investigate the degree to which different protocols relate to the similar or different metacognitive constructs and processes, (ii) implement experiments to identify neural substrates necessary for metacognition based on protocols used in educational sciences, (iii) study the effects of training metacognitive knowledge in the brain, and (iv) perform developmental research in the metacognitive brain and compare it with the existing developmental literature from educational sciences regarding the domain-generality of metacognition.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Amsterdam, Informatics Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262); University of Amsterdam, Departement of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262)
2 University of Amsterdam, Informatics Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262); Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.431204.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0685 7679)
3 University of Amsterdam, Departement of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000000084992262); Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.419526.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9859 7917)