It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We compared the effect of dapagliflozin versus glibenclamide on the ratio of lean-to total mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, carotid subclinical atherosclerosis, HbA1c 7.0–9.0% and 40–70 years-old. Ninety-eight patients (61% male; mean age 57 ± 7 years) were randomized into dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or glibenclamide 5 mg/day on top of metformin. Body composition was measured by Dual Energy X-Ray at randomization and after 12 weeks of treatment. Glycemic control was equivalent in both groups. Dapagliflozin decreased total body mass (−2741 g [95% CI: −3360 to 1945]; p < 0.001) and lean mass (−347 g [95% CI: −761 to −106]; p < 0.001), while glibenclamide increased total body mass (1060 g [95% CI: 140 to 1836]; p < 0.001) and lean mass (929 g [95% CI: 575 to 1283]; p < 0.001) for the differences between arms. The lean-to-total mass ratio increased by 1.2% in the dapagliflozin group and 0,018% in the glibenclamide group (p < 0.001). Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of a negative balance in the lean-to total mass ratio [OR: 0.16 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.45); p < 0.001] even after adjustment for baseline lean-to total mass ratio, waist circumference, HOMAIR, HbA1c, mean of the two hands handgrip strength and gait speed [OR: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.03–0.57); p < 0.007]. In conclusion, under equivalent glycemic control, dapagliflozin reduced total body mass but increased the ratio of lean-to-total mass when compared with glibenclamide.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology Laboratory (Atherolab), Cardiology Department, Campinas, Brazil (GRID:grid.411087.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 2494)
2 State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology Laboratory (Atherolab), Cardiology Department, Campinas, Brazil (GRID:grid.411087.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 2494); Directory of Clinical Research and Innovation, Institute for Strategic Management in Healthcare (IGESDF), Brasília, Brazil (GRID:grid.411087.b)
3 University of Brasilia Medical School, Cardiology Division, Brasilia, Brazil (GRID:grid.7632.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 5157)
4 University of Campinas, Growth and Body Composition Lab, Center for Investigation in Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil (GRID:grid.411087.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 2494)