It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Telomerase RNA (TR) carries the template for synthesis of telomere DNA and provides a scaffold for telomerase assembly. Fungal TRs are long and have been compared to higher eukaryotes, where they show considerable diversity within phylogenetically close groups. TRs of several Saccharomycetaceae were recently identified, however, many of these remained uncharacterised in the template region. Here we show that this is mainly due to high variability in telomere sequence. We predicted the telomere sequences using Tandem Repeats Finder and then we identified corresponding putative template regions in TR candidates. Remarkably long telomere units and the corresponding putative TRs were found in Tetrapisispora species. Notably, variable lengths of the annealing sequence of the template region (1–10 nt) were found. Consequently, species with the same telomere sequence may not harbour identical TR templates. Thus, TR sequence alone can be used to predict a template region and telomere sequence, but not to determine these exactly. A conserved feature of telomere sequences, tracts of adjacent Gs, led us to test the propensity of individual telomere sequences to form G4. The results show highly diverse values of G4-propensity, indicating the lack of ubiquitous conservation of this feature across Saccharomycetaceae.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316)
2 Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316); Masaryk University, Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.10267.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 0956)
3 Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316); Masaryk University, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Brno, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.10267.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 0956)
4 Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB-CSIC, Ajuntament de Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.507630.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4293)