1. Introduction
In recent years, the consumption of fresh-cut leafy vegetables has increased and among them, baby leaf lettuce is very widespread. Baby leaf lettuce is widely cultivated in Italy under both open field and greenhouse conditions [1]. Baby leaf vegetables are characterized by a short cycle but it requires a correct agronomic management to avoid high levels of nitrate accumulation and pesticide residues in the final product [2]. Therefore, there is a paramount interest in enhancing its production and quality, and at the same time reducing the nitrate levels of leafy vegetables, in order to overcome the legal limit for the marketing imposed by the European Community (Reg. n° 1258/2011).
With the aim to boost yield and to contain the risk of nitrate accumulation in the leaves, the research community is focusing on the use of sustainable production technologies, including application of beneficial microorganisms (Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria, mycorrhiza and Trichoderma) and plant biostimulants [3,4,5,6]. In function of their origin, non-microbial plant biostimulants can be classified into five categories: (i) Seaweed extracts and microalgae, (ii) protein hydrolysate (PH) and amino acid containing products, (iii) plant extracts, (iv) humic substances and (v) silicon, with the first three groups commanding 75% of the market share [7,8,9,10]. Protein hydrolysate and amino acids containing products are normally obtained by enzymatic and/or chemical hydrolysis depending on the organic matrix (animal or vegetal) and are characterized by high percentages of amino acids and peptides, followed by carbohydrates and small amounts of micronutrients [7,8]. Moreover, plant extracts are normally produced through the fermentation of tropical plants and contain amino acids and peptides, carbohydrates but also vitamins and micronutrients with small quantities of phytohormones [8], while seaweed extracts particularly the brown macroalgae are obtained through a process called ‘cold cell burst’ and contain polysaccharides, osmolytes (proline and betaines), macro- and micro-nutrients, brassinosteroids and phytohormones (auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins; [11,12]).
Recent studies carried out on vegetable crops including leafy greens have demonstrated that foliar and/or root applications of plant or seaweed-based biostimulants elicit several physiological and molecular processes, thus resulting in improvements in growth, productivity, nutritional quality and nutrient use efficiency (NUE) and tolerance to abiotic stressors such as drought, soil and water salinity, nutrient deprivation and extreme temperatures [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The beneficial effects of vegetal- and seaweed-based biostimulants have been attributed to direct and indirect stimulation mechanisms [9]. The direct stimulation action of biostimulants include: (i) Activity enhancement of key enzymes involved in carbon and nitrogen (N) metabolism [13,20,25], (ii) eliciting hormone-activity in particular auxin- and gibberellin-like activities through bioactive peptides [26,27,28], (iii) physiological, biochemical and anatomical changes such as the production of antioxidant enzymes, pigments, secondary metabolites and smallest cell guard length and width [7,8,12,29]. In addition to direct mechanisms, indirect modes of actions on agronomical performance and nutrient uptake and assimilation have been also reported when vegetal- or seaweed extract-based biostimulants were applied as substrate drench and/or foliar spray [8,29]. The better nutritional status in biostimulant-treated plants in comparison to untreated plants has been mostly associated with root system modulation (increases in root biomass, root length and diameter and lateral root branching [8,12,29]).
Among the different agronomical claims of plant biostimulants, the capacity to improve NUE in particular, N is one of the most important claims supporting their placement in the market for both economic and environmental reasons [9]. However, limited scientific literature are available regarding the effects of plant biostimulants on vegetable crops under sub-optimal N regimens [20,22,30,31,32]. For instance, Sestili and co-workers [20] demonstrated that the application of a PH at optimal and sub-optimal N regimens enhanced hydroponically grown tomato performance, especially substrate drench. Interestingly, the same authors observed that protein hydrolysate at low N conditions upregulated gene expression for amino acid transporter and glutamine synthetase, leading to a higher assimilation of N with a positive impact on plant growth. Similarly, Carillo et al. [22] reported that foliar application of PH, especially under suboptimal N fertilization regimes (0 or 15 kg N ha−1) boost marketable yield of greenhouse spinach due to an enhancement of nutrient acquisition and to an increase in total amino acids in plants as well as to an improvement of photochemical efficiency, thus boosting yield.
Since there is ample evidence of species-specific response to plant biostimulants, especially that of leaf biostimulant permeability (through leaf cuticule and stomatal aperture) and thus the efficacy of the biostimulant product is species-dependent [9]; there is an urgent need among researchers to assess the effect of vegetal- and seaweed based-biostimulants on baby lettuce performance at different N fertilization regimes.
Taking into account all the previous considerations, an experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop to the foliar application of the legume-derived PH ‘Trainer®’, tropical plant extract ‘Auxym®’ and seaweed extract from Ecklonia maxima ‘Kelpak®’ under different N rates of 0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1. The responses of baby lettuce plants were assessed in terms of yield, leaf morphometric parameters and leaf quality traits.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Setting, Plant Material and Design
The experiment was carried out in a unheated plastic tunnel covered by polyethylene during the winter 2018 growing season (January 16—March 12) at Gussone Park, experimental site of the Department of Agricultural Sciences (40°48.870′ N; 14°20.821′ E; 70 m above sea level) located in Portici, southern Italy. The trend of daily maximum and minimum air temperature inside the plastic tunnel is reported in Figure 1. The baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cv. ‘Zarina’ (ISI Sementi SpA, Parma, Italy) was used as the selected crop.
A factorial combination of N fertilization (N) and biostimulant application (B) was applied based on four increasing N fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 or 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and three plant biostimulants (seaweed extract—SwE, legume-derived protein hydrolysate—LDPH and tropical plant extract—TPE) and a non-treated control. The experimental design was a randomized complete-block design with three replications, yielding 48 experimental units (4N × 4B × 3 replications) established in large lysimeters of reinforced fiber glass with a diameter of 0.70 m and a depth of 0.60 m. Each experimental unit consisted of one large lysimeters. The lysimeters were filled with a soil having the following chemical and physical characteristics reported in Table 1.
2.2. Nitrogen Fertilization Levels, Cultural Practices and Biostimulants Application
The baby leaf lettuce was hand seeded on January 16 at a plant density of 2500 seeds·m−2. The N was applied as calcium nitrate (26%) in a single operation 14 days after sowing. The calcium nitrate was used based on standard commercial practices used in Italy.
The three commercial SwE, LDPH and TPE-based biostimulants were made by ‘Kelpak®’ (Kelp Products (Pty) Ltd., Cape Town, South Africa), ‘Trainer®’ and ‘Auxym®’ (Italpollina S.p.A., Rivoli Veronese, Italy), respectively.
The SwE obtained through ‘cold cell burst’ mainly contained phytohormones (auxins and cytokinins with a very high auxin-to-cytokinin ratio), carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins (B1, B2, C and E) and macro- and micro-nutrients [18,19]. The LDPH-based biostimulant contained free amino acids and peptides (75%), carbohydrates (22%) and mineral nutrients (3%). The detailed aminogram was reported by Paul et al. [33,34]. The TPE biostimulant obtained by fermentation of tropical plants contained 54% of free amino acids and peptide, 17% carbohydrate, 23% mineral nutrients, 6% vitamins and 0.22% phytohormones as reported in detail by Caruso et al. [23,24]. Baby lettuce leaf plants were sprayed with a biostimulant solution containing 3 mL·L−1 of SwE and LDPH and 2·mL L−1 for TPE-based biostimulant, or with water (non-treated control), five times during the growing season at 7-day intervals, starting three weeks after sowing. The relative doses of the three commercial plant biostimulants were used based on manufacturer recommendations. The volume of the solution used during the five foliar applications was 100 mL per square meter.
2.3. Plant Growth Parameters, Marketable Yield, Leaf Colorimetry and Sampling
On March 12, the baby leaf lettuce was harvested in all experimental units. The leaf area was measured using an electronic leaf area meter (Li-Cor3000, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) in order to calculate the leaf area index (LAI). The marketable fresh yield was also measured and expressed in tons per ha, and a sub-sample was oven dried at 70 °C for 3 days in order to determine the leaf dry matter percentage, and the dry samples were consequently used for the mineral analysis. Furthermore, the specific leaf weight (leaf dry weight per unit area; mg·cm−2) as well as leaf succulence (leaf water content per unit area; mg·cm−2) were also recorded.
Leaf colorimetry was measured on the upper side of 10 leaves per experimental unit using Minolta CR-300 Chroma Meter (Minolta Camera Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in order to obtain the color space parameters (L*, a* and b*) and a portable chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) was also used to measure the SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) index.
Batch samples of fresh leaves from each experimental unit were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after harvest, lyophilized Christ, Alpha 1–4 (Osterode, Germany) and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.
2.4. Antioxidant Capacity Analysis
The lipophylic and hydrophilic antioxidant capacities were assessed on extract from freeze-dried baby lettuce leaves (200 mg) added with methanol and distilled water, respectively. The antioxidant activity of the lipophilic and hydrophilic extract fractions was measured spectrophotometrically based on the methods of Re et al. [35] and Fogliano et al. [36], respectively. The absorbance of the solutions for lipophilic and hydrophilic extract fractions were measured at 734 and 505 nm, respectively. Lipophylic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities were expressed as mmol of Trolox and mmol ascorbic acid per 100 g of dry weight (dw) [36].
2.5. Chlorophyllous Pigments and Nitrate Analysis
Chlorophyll and carotenoids content of the baby lettuce leaves were also assayed spectrophotometrically after the extraction of the fresh material (500 mg) using pure acetone as described in detail by Lichtentahler and Buschmann [37], whereas the nitrate content was determined based on the method of Sah [38]. The absorbance of the solutions for chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids and nitrate were measured at 662, 645, 470 and 550 nm. The chlorophyllous pigments were expressed as mg g−1 fresh weight (fw), while the nitrate content was expressed as mg kg−1 fw.
2.6. Total Ascorbic Acid Analysis
The total ascorbic acid (expressed as mg ascorbic acid on 100 g fw) was also assessed spectrophotometrically based on the protocol by Kampfenkel et al. [39]. The absorbance of the solution for total ascorbic acid was measured at 525 nm.
2.7. Statistical Processing
Morphological and qualitative data were statistically analyzed by a 2-way ANOVA using the SPSS 21 software package for Windows 2007. The means were separated by a Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of N Fertilization Levels and Biostimulant Application on Yield and Growth
The results regarding morphological parameters and marketable yield of baby lettuce are reported in Figure 2; Figure 3 and Table 2. For marketable fresh yield and leaf area index (LAI) significant interaction between fertilization (F) and biostimulant application (B) was observed, whereas leaf succulence and specific leaf weight (SLW) were only influenced by the two tested factors with no significant F × B interaction (Figure 2 and Figure 3, and Table 2). The fresh yield of baby lettuce in both biostimulant-treated and untreated plants was positively affected by increasing N fertilization levels from 0 to 20 kg N·ha−1, reaching a plateau thereafter indicating a luxury N conditions at 30 kg N·ha−1 (Figure 2). The marketable fresh yield of baby lettuce at N0 was clearly higher by 19% in biostimulant-treated plants compared untreated plants, with no significant differences between the three plant biostimulants tested (Figure 2). Interestingly, foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwE elicited significant increases (average 14%, 6% and 7% at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectively) compared to TPE and untreated plants (Figure 2). Similarly to the effects on marketable fresh yield, the leaf area index (LAI) in SwE and LDPH-treated plants at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1 was significantly higher compared to baby lettuce treated with TPE or untreated plants, whereas under non-fertilized conditions LAI was significantly higher in biostimulant compared to untreated plants, irrespective of the commercial biostimulants used (Figure 3).
When averaged over biostimulant application (F × B = not significant), the leaf succulence increased quadratically by increasing N fertilization levels from 10 to 30 kg N·ha−1 with no significant difference among the three N fertilization rates, whereas the SLW declined at 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1 (Table 2). Averaged over N fertilization levels, significant differentiation in terms of leaf succulence and SLW was recorded in response to biostimulants application with the higher values of succulence observed with LDPH and TPE followed by SwE as opposed to untreated plants, whereas the lowest values of SLW were recorded in baby lettuce treated with Ecklonia maxima extract (Table 2).
The stimulation effect of commercial biostimulants (6%–19%) recorded in the current research is in line with previous studies carried out on greenhouse fresh tomato treated with seaweed extracts of E. maxima or Ascophyllum nodosum, LDPE and TPE (7%–25%; [12,40]) but far lower than those recorded on greenhouse spinach [19]. The different stimulation effect among tested species indicates a crop-specific differential response to plant biostimulant applications and thus requires additional crop-specific studies to optimize plant biostimulants application, taking into consideration the following factors: environment, management practice and plant morphological traits (e.g., leaf permeability and cuticle thickness [9,28]).
Interestingly, LDPH (at 0 kg N·ha−1) and SwE (at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1) are likely to boost growth response and crop productivity as a consequence of the presence of bioactive molecules such as amino acids (tryptophan, glutamic and aspartic acids), soluble peptides (in LDPH) and polysaccharides (laminarans, fucoidans and alginates), phenolic compounds, osmolytes (proline, betaine and manitol) and phyohormones (abscisic acid, auxins, brassinosteroids, cytokinins and gibberellins) (in SwE) [8,29]. These former molecules present in seaweed and PH-based biostimulants may have triggered a signal transduction pathway through elicitation of endogenous phytohormone synthesis, thus leading to a higher crop productivity compared to untreated-baby lettuce plants [19,20]. Another possible mechanism of action (indirect mechanism) behind the stimulation of LAI and marketable fresh yield could be the modulation of the root system architecture in terms of root biomass, root volume and length and higher root branching triggered by tryptophan in LDPH and auxins in SwE, which improved nutrient uptake/translocation/assimilation, leading to a higher agronomical performance [12,19,41,42]. Our results are in agreement with those of Carillo and co-workers [22] who reported that foliar application of LDPH at a rate of 4 mL·L−1 under suboptimal N fertilization conditions (0 and 15 kg N·ha−1) increased the fresh yield of greenhouse spinach through an increase of the nutritional status (higher macronutrient accumulation), better photosynthetic activity and improving the total acid content.
3.2. Effect of N Fertilization Levels and Biostimulant Application on Leaf Colorimetry and SPAD Index
Among the physical properties that may affect the purchasing decisions of vegetable consumers is product appearance, in particular, the color of the vegetable [43]. In the present study, no significant interaction between N fertilization and biostimulants application was recorded for the three leaf colorimetric parameters lightness (L*), green color intensity (negative values of a*) and yellow color intensity (positive values of b*) (Table 3). The colorimetric CIELAB components L* and b* were significantly influenced by the two tested factors, whereas a* was only affected by N fertilization levels (Table 3). Increasing the N fertilization levels from 0 to 30 kg N·ha−1 yielded lighter baby lettuce leaf expression by increasing L* values, but with a decrease in a* values (Table 3). Moreover, when averaged over N fertilization levels, the foliar application of SwE and TPE-based biostimulants elicited an increase in L* values compared to the untreated control, whereas LDPH treatment exhibited intermediate values (Table 3).
Interestingly, the foliar application of commercial plant biostimulants improved the SPAD index significantly; this is an important physiological parameter having a crucial role on the primary metabolism of plants. With the exception of under N20, where no significant difference in the SPAD index was observed, between biostimulants-treated and untreated plants, the foliar application with SwE (at 10 and 30 kg N·ha−1) and with the three commercial biostimulants (at 0 kg N·ha−1) incurred a significant increase in the SPAD index (Figure 4). Our findings have been also demonstrated in many leafy vegetable species such as jute, lettuce, and spinach [16,19,22]. The highest SPAD values observed after the application of plant biostimulants in particular extracts from brown macroalgae could be attributed to several putative mechanisms like the following: (i) better translocation of soluble sugars via the phloem, (ii) increases in the biogenesis of chloroplast, as well as (iii) limited chlorophyll degradation, and thus, delayed senescence [29,44,45].
3.3. Effect of N Fertilization Levels and Biostimulant Application on Nitrate Accumulation and Biochemical Parameters
Nitrate was affected by both N fertilization levels and biostimulant application, without significant F × B interaction (Table 4). The nitrate concentration in baby lettuce leaf was negatively affected by N fertilization levels. Increasing the N fertilization from 0 to 30 kg N·ha−1 increased the nitrate accumulation in leaves, especially at 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, where the content of nitrate was above the upper limits set by the European Union (EU) for safe lettuce marketing (Commission Regulation No. 1258/2011; 3000 to 5000 mg NO3−·kg−1 of lettuce depending on growing season and cultivation conditions). On the other hand, when averaged over N fertilization levels, the nitrate concentration in LDPH treated plants was significantly lower on average by 21.2% compared to baby lettuce treated with SwE or TPE and it was not significantly different than untreated-baby lettuce plants (Table 4). The capacity of LDPH, which is mainly composed of soluble solids and especially amino acids, to accumulate less nitrate in the leaf tissue, could be attributed to a molecular mechanism such as the up-regulation of genes involved in N metabolism such as nitrate reducatse, and consequently, to an augmenting assimilation of nitrates into amino acids [46,47]. Furthermore, other studies conducted by Sady and Smoleń [31] and Smoleń and Sady [32] on carrots and spinach, respectively, reported that after the foliar application of ‘Pentakeep V’ containing 5-aminolevulinic acid was able to reduce nitrate accumulation in combination with a 50% N dose, whereas an opposite trend was observed in combination with 100% N. The authors concluded that nitrate accumulation in response to biostimulant application may change in relation to several interacting variables including species, variety and N application rates.
One of the beneficial responses of plant biostimulants application is an increase in chlorophyllous pigments such as chlorophyll a, b and total, as well as carotenoids. This was the case in the current research study, since the foliar application of LDPH and TPE incurred a significant increase in chlorophyll a and b and consequently the total chlorophyll compared to SwE and untreated-baby lettuce plants (Table 4). Furthermore, the content of carotenoids was positively affected by the foliar application of SwE and LDPH compared to the control treatment (Table 4). This beneficial effect of vegetal and seaweed extract-based biostimulants on carotenoids and especially chlorophyll content has been recorded also in corn, jute and eggplant [21,22,48,49]. The increase in chlorophyll a and total content in both LDPH and TPE (characterized by the high percentage of free amino acids (75% and 54%, respectively [23,24]) could be attributed to the higher content of primary amino acids in the vegetal-based treated plants as amino acids (e.g., alanine, aspartate, asparagines and glutamate) which help to boost chlorophyll content, and consequently, increase photosynthetic activity as well as the quantum yield of O2 evolution [22].
3.4. Effect of N Fertilization Levels and Biostimulant Application on Antioxidant Capacity and Bioactive Content
Lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) antioxidant activities as well as total ascorbic acid (TAA) were significantly affected by both factors with a significant F × B interaction (Table 5). Antioxidant scavenging activity was an important functional quality parameter in assessing the nutritional properties of foods including leafy vegetables, since lipophilic (e.g., β-carotene, lutein, α-tocopherol, etc.) and hydrophilic (e.g., vitamin C, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, quercitin, etc.) antioxidant molecules impart beneficial effects to human health, as these bioactive molecules are known to play a primary role in delaying oxidative damage, thus, preventing a wide range of diseases [50,51,52,53,54]. In the current study, LAA, HAA and TAA of the baby lettuce ranged from 19.9 to 32.3 mmol trolox 100·g−1 dw, from 3.0 to 8.2 mmol ascorbic acid 100 g−1 dw and from 6.8 to 33.4 mg g−1, respectively (Table 5).
High N fertilizer application (20 and especially 30 kg·N ha−1) resulted in undesirable decreases in HAA and TAA of baby lettuce leaves (Table 5), which is in agreement with the results of Wang et al. [55] who reported that high N fertilization levels can result in undesirable changes in the quality attributes of fruit and leafy vegetables such as soluble solids and ascorbic acid leading to a decrease in commercial, nutritional and functional quality.
The vegetal- and seaweed extract-based biostimulants applied to baby lettuce resulted in higher antioxidant capacity and bioactive content depending on the N fertilization levels compared to untreated control treatment. For instance, at N0 the highest antioxidant activities and TAA compared to the untreated control were recorded in baby lettuce treated with LDPH and SwE-based biostimulant plants, respectively, whereas at N10 and N30 the highest LAA and HAA contents were observed in TPE and LDPH treated plants, respectively (Table 5). Our findings on the effect of plant biostimulants on nutritional and functional quality of the product were in line with previous research on vegetal-based biostimulants (protein hydrolysate and plant extract) conducted by Caruso et al. [23], in which foliar application at weekly interval increases the LAA, HAA and TAA contents of perennial wall rocket compared to the non-treated control. Similarly, Vasantharaja et al. [56] demonstrated that the application of seaweed extract-based biostimulant (Sargassum swartzii) boosted the antioxidant activity and the bioactive content (e.g., phenols and vitamin C) of cowpea. A mechanistic explanation of the beneficial effect of plant biostimulants, in particular LDPH, on the biosynthesis of antioxidant molecules could be due to: i) the activity stimulation of key enzymes involved in antioxidant homeostasis in cells, and ii) the higher macro- and micro-nutrient assimilation of biostimulant-treated plants which could contribute to the synthesis of amino acids, phenylalanine and tyrosine [7,40].
4. Conclusions
The idea of working with plant biostimulants to increase yield under both optimal and suboptimal conditions is gaining interest among leafy vegetable growers, as well as private companies and researchers for both economic and environmental reasons. The foliar application of vegetal and seaweed extract-based biostimulants, in particular SwE and LDPH enhanced plant growth, and productivity especially under sub-optimal N regimens, and to a lesser extent; at 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1. The foliar application of SwE and LDPH was effective in supporting better physiological and biochemical status in terms of the SPAD index, chlorophyll and carotenoids content leading to a higher agronomical performance. Interestingly, the leaf quality traits of baby lettuce leaf can be improved by biostimulation action, especially with LDPH which delivered leaves with high antioxidant activity and total ascorbic acid as well as low nitrate content. The results of the current experiment highlight the benefit of using vegetal and seaweed extract-based biostimulants in baby lettuce to improve productivity under both optimal and especially suboptimal N regimens, bringing benefits to farmers and to the environment.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M.; methodology, I.D.M., E.C.; software, L.O.; validation, M.M., I.D.M., E.C. and L.O.; formal analysis, L.O.; investigation, I.D.M.; resources, M.M.; data curation, I.D.M. and L.O.; writing—original draft preparation, I.D.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.R.; visualization, M.G. and G.C.; supervision, G.C. and M.M.; project administration, M.M.; funding acquisition, M.M.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures and Tables
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Trend of the maximum and minimum air temperature inside the plastic tunnel during the growing period of baby lettuce.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on the marketable fresh yield of baby lettuce plants. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on the leaf area index (LAI) of baby lettuce plants. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on the SPAD index of baby lettuce plants. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Physical and chemical properties of the soil used in this work.
| Soil Properties | Units | Mean Values |
|---|---|---|
| Texture | ||
| Coarse sand | % | 69.1 |
| Fine sand | % | 21.9 |
| Silt | % | 4.5 |
| Clay | % | 4.5 |
| Chemical properties | ||
| pH | - | 6.54 |
| Electrical conductivity | dS·m−1 | 0.64 |
| Organic matter | g·kg−1 | 32.4 |
| Total N (Kjeldahl method) | g·kg−1 | 1.2 |
| P2O5 (Olsen method) | mg·kg−1 | 312.8 |
| K2O (Tetraphenylborate method) | mg·kg−1 | 620.7 |
| NO3-N | mg·kg−1 | 10.0 |
| NH4-N | mg·kg−1 | 9.0 |
Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on leaf succulence and specific leaf weight (SLW) of baby lettuce plants.
| Treatments | Succulence | SLW |
|---|---|---|
| (mg H2O·cm−2) | (mg dm·cm−2) | |
| Fertilization (F) | ||
| N0 | 59.9 b | 2.99 a |
| N10 | 71.5 a | 3.26 a |
| N20 | 69.9 a | 2.66 b |
| N30 | 67.7 a | 2.60 b |
| Biostimulant (B) | ||
| Control | 60.5 c | 2.94 a |
| SwE | 65.2 b | 2.56 b |
| LDPH | 70.4 a | 2.92 a |
| TPE | 72.9 a | 3.10 a |
| Significance | ||
| F | ** | ** |
| B | * | * |
| F × B | NS | NS |
NS, *, and ** indicate non-significant, significant at p < 0.05, significant at p < 0.01, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Table 3Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on leaf hunter color parameters of baby lettuce plants.
| Table | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilization (F) | |||
| N0 | 55.9 d | −20.8 a | 39.8 b |
| N10 | 56.7 c | −21.2 a | 40.1 b |
| N20 | 58.7 b | −22.7 b | 41.8 a |
| N30 | 59.5 a | −22.7 b | 42.4 a |
| Biostimulants (B) | |||
| Control | 56.5 c | −21.5 | 39.8 b |
| SwE | 58.5 a | −22.2 | 41.6 a |
| LDPH | 57.5 b | −21.8 | 41.0 a |
| TPE | 58.3 a | −21.9 | 41.6 a |
| Significance | |||
| F | ** | * | * |
| B | * | NS | * |
| F × B | NS | NS | NS |
NS, *, and ** indicate non-significant, significant at p < 0.05, or significant at p < 0.01, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Table 4Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) on nitrate, chlorophyll and carotenoids content of baby lettuce plants.
| Treatments | Nitrate | Chlorophyll a | Chlorophyll b | Total chlorophyll | Carotenoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg·kg−1 fw) | (mg·g−1 fw) | (mg·g−1 fw) | (mg·g−1 fw) | (µg·g−1 fw) | |
| Fertilization (F) | |||||
| N0 | 703.3 d | 0.298 b | 0.211 | 0.508 b | 156 b |
| N10 | 1476.0 c | 0.330 a | 0.210 | 0.540 a | 178 a |
| N20 | 6206.7 b | 0.334 a | 0.201 | 0.535 a | 170 a |
| N30 | 7288.1 a | 0.338 a | 0.209 | 0.546 a | 170 a |
| Biostimulants (B) | |||||
| Control | 3366.5 b | 0.302 b | 0.191 c | 0.493 b | 155 c |
| SwE | 4467.6 a | 0.319 b | 0.192 c | 0.511 b | 181 a |
| LDPH | 3504.4 b | 0.342 a | 0.214 b | 0.556 a | 173 ab |
| TPE | 4426.5 a | 0.337 a | 0.232 a | 0.569 a | 164 bc |
| Significance | |||||
| F | ** | * | NS | * | * |
| B | * | * | ** | * | * |
| F × B | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
NS, *, and ** indicate non-significant, significant at p < 0.05, or significant at p < 0.01, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
Table 5Effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N ha−1; N0, N10, N20 and N30, respectively) and biostimulant applications (untreated control, SwE: Extract of seaweed Ecklonia maxima, LDPH: Legume-derived protein hydrolysate and TPE: Tropical plant extract) lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) antioxidant activities and total ascorbic acid (TAA) of baby lettuce plants.
| Treatments | LAA | HAA | TAA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mmol Trolox eq. 100 g−1 dw | mmol ascorbic acid eq. 100 g−1 dw | mg g−1 fw | ||
| N0 | Control | 26.2 b | 6.7 c | 25.0 b |
| SwE | 27.6 b | 6.6 c | 33.4 a | |
| LDPH | 32.3 a | 8.2 a | 18.0 c | |
| TPE | 25.2 b | 7.2 bc | 18.6 c | |
| N10 | Control | 21.0 c | 7.6 b | 17.3 c |
| SwE | 20.4 c | 7.5 b | 16.8 c | |
| LDPH | 20.9 c | 7.7 b | 18.1 c | |
| TPE | 30.9 a | 7.6 b | 16.9 c | |
| N20 | Control | 22.0 c | 4.9 d | 14.0 de |
| SwE | 22.2 c | 4.8 d | 14.3 d | |
| LDPH | 19.9 c | 4.4 d | 12.6 de | |
| TPE | 22.1 c | 3.0 e | 14.5 d | |
| N30 | Control | 21.8 c | 3.3 e | 13.2 de |
| SwE | 20.1 c | 3.2 e | 11.7 e | |
| LDPH | 21.9 c | 4.5 d | 12.6 de | |
| TPE | 21.5 c | 3.4 e | 6.8 f | |
| Significance | ||||
| Fertilization (F) | ** | ** | ** | |
| Biostimulant (B) | * | * | ** | |
| F × B | ** | ** | ** |
*, ** significant at p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan’s test (significance level 0.05).
© 2019 by the authors.
Details
; Ottaiano, Lucia 1 ; Giordano, Maria 1
; Rouphael, Youssef 1
; Colla, Giuseppe 3
; Mori, Mauro 1 1 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici 80055, Italy;
2 Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA)-Research Center for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Caserta 81100, Italy
3 Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo 01100, Italy;