It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mangroves buffer inland ecosystems from hurricane winds and storm surge. However, their ability to withstand harsh cyclone conditions depends on plant resilience traits and geomorphology. Using airborne lidar and satellite imagery collected before and after Hurricane Irma, we estimated that 62% of mangroves in southwest Florida suffered canopy damage, with largest impacts in tall forests (>10 m). Mangroves on well-drained sites (83%) resprouted new leaves within one year after the storm. By contrast, in poorly-drained inland sites, we detected one of the largest mangrove diebacks on record (10,760 ha), triggered by Irma. We found evidence that the combination of low elevation (median = 9.4 cm asl), storm surge water levels (>1.4 m above the ground surface), and hydrologic isolation drove coastal forest vulnerability and were independent of tree height or wind exposure. Our results indicated that storm surge and ponding caused dieback, not wind. Tidal restoration and hydrologic management in these vulnerable, low-lying coastal areas can reduce mangrove mortality and improve resilience to future cyclones.
Mangroves are adapted to cope with tropical storms, but might be threatened by rising frequency and intensity of these events. Here the authors document one of the largest mangrove diebacks on record following Hurricane Irma in Florida, and show a greater role of storm surge and ponding rather than wind as a mechanism for mangrove dieback.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 East Carolina University, Department of Coastal Studies, Wanchese, USA (GRID:grid.255364.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 0423)
2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Greenbelt, USA (GRID:grid.133275.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 6666)
3 Florida International University, Institute of Environment, Miami, USA (GRID:grid.65456.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2110 1845)
4 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Greenbelt, USA (GRID:grid.133275.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 6666); Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, USA (GRID:grid.427409.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0453 291X)
5 Florida International University, Department of Earth and Environment, Miami, USA (GRID:grid.65456.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2110 1845)