Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Objective

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented emergency departments (EDs) with many challenges to address the acute care needs of patients. Many EDs have leveraged telehealth to innovatively respond to these challenges. This review describes the landscape of telehealth initiatives in emergency care that have been described during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature using PubMed, supplemented by a review of the gray literature (ie, non‐peer reviewed), with input from subject matter experts to identify telehealth initiatives in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019. We categorized types of telehealth use based on purpose and user characteristics.

Results

We included 27 papers from our review of the medical literature and another 8 sources from gray literature review. The vast majority of studies (32/35) were descriptive in nature, with the additional inclusion of 2 cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial. There were 5 categories of ED telehealth use during the pandemic: (1) pre‐ED evaluation and screening, (2) within ED (including as a means of limiting staff and patient exposure and facilitating consultation with specialists), (3) post‐ED discharge monitoring and treatment, (4) educating trainees and health care workers, and (5) coordinating resources and patient care.

Conclusion

Telehealth has been used in a variety of manners during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, enabling innovation in emergency care delivery. The findings from this study can be used by institutions to consider how telehealth may address challenges in emergency care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond. Because few studies included cost data and given the variability in institutional resources, how organizations implement telehealth programs will likely vary. Future work should further explore barriers and facilitators of innovation, and the impact on care delivery and patient outcomes.

Details

Title
Telehealth use in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review
Author
Jaffe, Todd A 1 ; Hayden, Emily 2 ; Lori Uscher‐Pines 3 ; Sousa, Jessica 4 ; Schwamm, Lee H 5 ; Mehrotra, Ateev 6 ; Zachrison, Kori S 2 

 Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
 RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA 
 RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
 Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
 Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
Section
The Practice of Emergency Medicine
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Jun 2021
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
e-ISSN
26881152
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2546000495
Copyright
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.