It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To identify the specific region of eCG involved in FSH-like activity, the following mutant expression vectors were constructed targeting the amino acid residues 102–104 of the eCG β-subunit: single mutants, eCGβV102G/α, eCGβF103P/α, and eCGβR104K/α; double mutants, eCGβV102G;F103P/α, eCGβV102G;R104K/α, and eCGβF103P;R104K/α; triple mutant, eCGβV102G;F103P;R104K/α. The LH-like and FSH-like activities of eCG mutants were examined in CHO-K1 cells expressing rat LH/CG receptor and rat FSH receptor. The levels of eCGβV102G/α, eCGβR104K/α, and eCGβV102G;R104K/α in the culture supernatant were markedly lower than those of eCGβ/α-wt. The other mutants and rec-eCGβ/α-wt were efficiently secreted into the culture supernatant. The LH-like activities of eCGV104G/α, eCGβV102G;R104K/α, and eCGβF103P;R104K/α were approximately 61%, 52%, and 54%, respectively, of those of eCG-wt. The Rmax values of the mutants were 58.9%–78.8% those of eCG-wt with eCGβR104K/α exhibiting the lowest value. The FSH-like activities of single mutants were only 16%–20% of those of eCG-wt. Additionally, the FSH-like activity of double mutants was less than 10% of that of eCG-wt. In particular, the FSH-like activities of βV102G;R104K/α and βF103P;R104K/α were 2.5–2.9% of that of eCG-wt. These results suggest that the amino acid residues 102–104 of the eCG β-subunit are dispensable and that the residue 104 of the eCG β-subunit plays a pivotal role in signal transduction through the rat FSH receptor. Thus, these mutants may aid future studies on eCG interactions with mammalian FSH receptors in vitro and in vivo.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Animal Life and Environmental Science, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University, Ansung, Korea
2 School of Animal Life Biotechnology, Hankyong National University, Ansung, Korea
3 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea
4 Animal Life and Environmental Science, Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University, Ansung, Korea; School of Animal Life Biotechnology, Hankyong National University, Ansung, Korea





