1. Introduction
Modern industrial developments often pay minimal attention to environmental sustainability. Mercury has been used extensively in various industries such as gold and coal mining as well as in electrical equipment, batteries, semiconductors and medical appliances [1,2,3,4,5]. Mercury compounds are also naturally emitted into the atmosphere from volcanoes, forest fires, the weathering of rocks and soils [6]. Although it benefits various industries, mercury and its derivatives are harmful to ecosystems and to humans. Elemental and organic mercury is toxic to the peripheral and central nervous systems. The exposure of mercury vapor can produce adverse effects on the neural, digestive and immune systems [3]. Methylmercury is the most toxic derivate amongst the mercury compounds that develop from inorganic mercury through the activity of microorganisms living in aquatic systems including rivers, lakes, wetlands, sediments, soils and the ocean. The higher toxicity of methylmercury compared with inorganic mercury is the result of its lipophilic nature. It tends to bioaccumulate within the living cell and subsequently undergoes bioaccumulation throughout the food chain [7]. Therefore, mercury in the natural environment is an important chemical that needs to be monitored continuously due to its extremely toxic nature.
Recently, digital image-based colorimetry is receiving more attention as an alternative to the conventional methods, owing to its green, low-cost, portable and simple analytical procedure to analyze chemical compounds including metals [8,9,10,11], anions [12,13], organics [14,15], biochemical compounds [16,17] and medical applications [18,19,20]. The dynamic range of the digital image represented by red-green-blue or RGB color space (i.e., from 0 to 255), is much broader than conventional colorimetry or spectrophotometry methods (i.e., from 0 to 2.0 absorbance) providing the opportunity to improve the sensitivity of detection [8,18]. The main requirement of quantitative analysis using the colorimetry method is that the target analyte must be colored. Generally, the analyst uses organic ligands to make the colorless metal of interest colorful. However, organic ligands are toxic and less selective to specific metal targets. Recently, many researchers have developed noble metal nanoparticles as color probes to detect mercury ions [21,22,23,24]. Gold and silver nanoparticles have several advantages over organic ligands to make colorless metals colorful, such as better sensitivity, greater selectivity to a specific metal’s target and lower toxicity. Therefore, this new kind of colorimetry using digital imaging coupled with noble metal nanoparticles is becoming popular in the detection of mercury ions. However, the limit of detection (LOD) is at the sub-ppm range [25,26], comparable to those of conventional colorimetry and spectrophotometry methods, and is still too high to detect mercury contamination in drinking water. Therefore, it is crucial to improve the LOD of the previously proposed colorimetry methods. Here, we report the first quantitative method for the detection of mercury ions at the ppb level using silver nanoparticles as a probe, coupled with image-based colorimetric sensing. In addition, we built a paper-based analytical device (PAD) and a smartphone application for better portability.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Instruments
All chemicals used were of analytical grade or of the highest purity available. Silver nitrate, ascorbic acid, trisodium citrate, salts of cations for selectivity tests and other chemicals were supplied by Merck Ltd. (Darmstadt, Germany). All glassware was washed with detergent (5%), 4 M HCl and deionized water before use. River water samples were filtered through a 2.5 µm Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, UK). Absorption spectra of the synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were measured using a UV-visible Spectrophotometer (B-One, Messgerate). As a reference method, mercury ion analysis was conducted using ICP-OES (Varian 725-ES Agilent Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). A smartphone camera (Redmi Note 3 Pro, Xiaomi, Beijing, China) with a 16 MP sensor, f/2.0 aperture, phase detection focusing and dual-LED (Light Emitting Diode) flash was used to record pictures as digital images.
2.2. Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) Preparation
AgNPs were synthesized from silver nitrate (AgNO3) with ascorbic acid as a reductant. Trisodium citrate was used as a stabilizing agent to prevent aggregation of the formed AgNPs. Typically, 80 µL of 0.1 M aqueous AgNO3 was added into 8 mL of aqueous solution containing ascorbic acid (6 × 10−4 M) and trisodium citrate (3 × 10−3 M) under constant stirring at 30 °C on a hotplate. The procedure was conducted at pH 7.0, modified from Qin et al. [27]. The colloid of AgNPs was formed after 15 min and is characterized by the appearance of a yellowish brown color from the initial colorless solution. Further characterization of the AgNPs was conducted using the spectrophotometer.
2.3. Image Acquisition and Paper-Based Analytical Device (PAD) Preparation
Digital images of the sample in cuvettes were taken by a smartphone in a custom-made mini photo studio, while those of the PAD were taken in a custom-made photo box. The PAD was printed on a Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), using a modified inkjet ip2770 printer (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) with hydrophobic ink and permanent-ink markers. The post-processing of the digital image was initially done using a personal computer with software such as Photoshop (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) for cropping and adjustment, MATLAB (MathWorks) for RGB color value extraction and Android Studio (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) for building the smartphone application. More detailed procedures have been published elsewhere [8,26,28,29,30].
2.4. Quantification of the Digital Image
To validate the code of the smartphone application, we used manual image processing procedures described as follows [8]. In brief, the digital image from the smartphone camera was transferred to the computer and processed with Adobe Photoshop software. In this case, a digital image from the smartphone camera serves as a spectrophotometer analyzing the light passing through the colloid of the AgNPs. The average RGB color values were extracted from the image using MATLAB software. The raw plot of the RGB color values against the concentration of the standards, produces a hyperbolic trend. To obtain a linear plot for further usage, the initial RGB color values were converted to logarithmic scale following the Lambert–Beer law derivation formula as follows [8]:
IR, IG and IB are the (color) intensity or absorbance for red, green and blue, respectively. The terms (RGB)0 and (RGB)s are the RGB color values of the blank and the sample, respectively. It should be pointed out that here, the term ‘intensity’ refers to the number of R, G and B color values of the digital image, and thus is different from that used in UV-visible spectrophotometry. The logarithmic conversion of RGB color values is directly proportional to the mercury ion concentration, so it can be used for the quantification of mercury ions in the samples.
2.5. Construction of the Smartphone Application
Android Studio software was used to build the app for in situ digital image cropping, adjustment, color value extraction and data processing. Directly after pouring the samples solution into the colloid of the AgNPs or the PAD, the digital image was captured as a photograph and processed by the android application. Thus, the concentration of mercury ions in the photographed sample can be identified instantly by the smartphone. To minimize any error from the camera and external sources, the samples were always photographed together with the standards in one file. Thus, errors from external sources were minimized. We also used an additional application (Camera FV-5), to manually control the camera setting with ISO 200, aperture f/2.0, focus, white balance and exposure. The examples of the smartphone application interface and android studio coding are shown in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1). The application was published and can be downloaded from the Google Play Store under the name “Mercury Detector.”
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Silver Nanoparticles as a Colorimetric Agent
The synthesized AgNPs have a yellowish brown color with the highest absorbance obtained at 420 nm wavelength (λmax). This result was in accordance with previous reports [26,27,28]. The AgNPs were stable for 30 days as shown by the color and the uniform peak absorbance (Figure S2). However, after 45 days, the aggregation of nanoparticles started to occur, and the peak absorbance also decreased. The aggregation of the AgNPs that occurs after a longer period of storage (more than 30 days) is probably due to electromagnetic interactions among the silver nanoparticles which induce the agglomeration of AgNPs to a larger size. This phenomenon eventually changes the yellowish brown color of AgNPs to dark brown and then it becomes colorless, followed by the formation of the suspended particles at the bottom of the container. The mechanism for mercury colorimetric detection using silver nanoparticles as a probe is reduction–oxidation. The oxidation of Ag(0) to Ag(I) by Hg(II) changes the color of the AgNPs to colorless. This redox reaction generates the change in the nanoparticles’ size known as the Mie blue shift of the AgNPs’ absorption band [26].
By using the fresh AgNPs, the selectivity experiment was conducted on various cations that could interfere with the accuracy and precision of the proposed method. There is no color change of AgNPs after adding 60 ppm of aluminum, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, sodium and zinc. However, when Hg was added to AgNPs, the peak absorbance at 420 nm disappeared and the mixture became colorless within seconds. This proved that the proposed method is selective to mercury ions only (Figure 1).
3.2. Improving the Sensitivity and Portability of Digital Image-Based Colorimetry
Most of the colorimetry methods for mercury quantification can only achieve a detection limit (LOD) comparable to that of a visible spectrophotometer, which is in the sub-ppm range, with visible color changes starting from 20 ppm or above [26,28,29,30]. However, the threshold of mercury in drinking water allowed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 2 ppb [31,32], which is two orders of magnitude lower than the detection limit achieved by most colorimetry and spectrophotometry methods. To overcome this shortcoming, in this report we improved the detection limit by using a custom-made mini photo studio to control the light as shown in Figure 2.
Aside from using the custom-made photo studio, cuvettes replaced vial bottles that were used in previous methods as cuvettes have a flat surface. The flat form of the container’s surface is crucial in achieving accurate and precise results with digital image-based colorimetry. By using flat-surfaced cuvettes as sample containers, coupled with white LED lamps from photo studio lighting, we could easily distinguish mercury concentration at the ppb level as shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. The results of ppm-level plots are shown in Figure S3. The intensity of the blue color increases linearly along with the increasing mercury concentration from 1 to 4 ppb (Table 1 and Figure 3). Blue is the complementary color of the yellowish brown color of AgNPs. Therefore, blue will have the best linearity and highest slope. As a consequence, since red and green are not the complementary colors of AgNPs, they will have poor linearity and slope. Thus, we only used blue intensity for further calculation for our research. Using the optimized method, we were able to achieve a lower detection limit—0.86 ppb—calculated from three times the standard deviation (σ) of 10 replicates of blank measurements, divided by the slope of the calibration curve at the ppb level (3σ of the blank/slope).
As a means of increasing portability, we applied the method to the paper-based analytical device (PAD) [33,34]. The PAD was built on a Whatman filter paper that has a good porosity for the movement of the sample solution. Hydrophobic ink was used to fortify the fluid and keep it in the reaction channel. A permanent-ink marker was also used to make the channel constraint line of the PAD better. After filter paper for the PAD was heated at 150 °C for 5 min in an oven, the ink swelled and penetrated the bottom of the paper, which aids in preventing the solution from leaking from the backside. The digital image file was then taken in a custom photo box using a smartphone. The actual photograph of the PAD, with a diameter of 3 cm, is shown in Figure 4. The results of the PAD digital image processing were in accordance with those of cuvette digital image processing.
3.3. Recovery Experiments
To validate the proposed method, we conducted recovery experiments from real samples, which have their own sample’s matrix, using the standard addition method and spiking the sample. River water close to the effluent point of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Bengkulu province was chosen as the target sample. For the digital image-based colorimetry method, the mercury concentration was determined from Blue color intensity by using the Lambert–Beer equation (Figure S4), following the method in our previously published paper [8]. The results are shown in Table 2, using both the liquid approach and the PAD, with ICP-OES as a reference method for the accuracy test. The accuracy, calculated as the percent error of the proposed digital image-based colorimetry method, was less than 2.4%. The precision of the proposed method, calculated as the percent relative standard deviation (RSD) from three replicate analyses, was better than 2.5%. Therefore, the accuracy and precision were satisfactory.
The high content of mercury ions in river water at the gold mining area (i.e., 81.7 ppb) shows that the use of mercury for gold extraction contaminated the water body. The release of mercury into river water will pollute freshwater biota that in turn will endanger humans themselves, as a result of mercury bioaccumulation in fish. A more detailed discussion on this matter will be published elsewhere.
4. Conclusions
In the current digital era, one of the most affordable and straightforward quantitative methods is to monitor the color change of an analyte of interest using a ubiquitous smartphone. Modern smartphones mostly have a good quality camera with high resolution. In our research, we used a built-in smartphone camera and a smartphone application for processing the primary color input, as red-green-blue (RGB) channels, in order to analyze mercury ion concentration. Decent ambiance lighting is crucial to obtain accurate, precise and sensitive results. In addition, the flat surface of cuvettes used as the sample containers gave better results compared to the round-surfaced sample containers (e.g., vial bottles). By combining the digital image-based colorimetry with paper-based analytical devices and using a smartphone as a detector, we achieved better portability and sensitivity with good accuracy and precision. The proposed method assures a simple, low-cost, green and portable analytical method for mercury ion quantification that can be used in a remote area with limited resources.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at
Author Contributions
This paper was prepared through the contributions of all authors. M.L.F. designed and performed the experiment, wrote the initial manuscript and secured the research funding. A.A., N.M. and M.H. performed the experiment. R.E., L.R. and R.K. contributed to the final manuscript preparation.
Funding
This research was funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, grant numbers 053/SP2H/LT/DRPM/IV/2019 and PKM-PIMNAS 2018.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Dita Retnowati for developing the first version of the smartphone application and Hendry Nordan for the river water sampling and treatment.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Change in absorbance of the silver nanoparticles’ (AgNPs) colloid in the presence of 60 ppm Hg(II) and other metal ions.
Figure 2. (a) Custom photo studio with 12 Volt LED lamps for appropriate lighting; (b) the result of the digital image at ppb-level mercury standards from 0 to 4 ppb; (c) the color change at the ppm level of mercury ion concentration from 0 to 150 ppm. The volume of the sample in each cuvette was 1 mL.
Figure 3. The cropped digital image of standard solutions containing 1 to 4 ppb mercury ions, and the corresponding calibration curve with blue color as the complementary color of the yellowish brown color of AgNPs that gives the highest slope. Error bars were calculated from three replicates.
Figure 4. Schematic of the paper-based analytical device (PAD) preparation and digital image acquisition for mercury ion determination. As with the colorimetric sensor, silver nanoparticles were embedded on the PAD before sample addition. Each piece of PAD paper contains standards and a sample.
RGB color value and intensity of the mercury calibration curve at the ppb level.
Hg(II) Concentration (ppb) | Color Value | Color Intensity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
0 | 132 | 127 | 38.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 133 | 129 | 38.9 | 2.87 | 5.24 | 10.3 |
2 | 133 | 130 | 39.6 | 3.15 | 8.23 | 17.2 |
3 | 134 | 132 | 40.3 | 6.39 | 17.0 | 24.7 |
4 | 134 | 132 | 40.9 | 5.23 | 14.9 | 31.7 |
Recovery experiments of spiked river water samples (n = 3).
Added Hg(II) (ppb) | Digital Image-Based Colorimetry | ICP-OES |
|
---|---|---|---|
Found (ppb) | Recovery (%) | ||
0 | 81.7 ± 2.5 | - | 83.2 |
40 | 123 ± 3 | 101 | 126 |
80 | 160 ± 4 | 98.9 | 161 |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019 by the authors.
Abstract
The rapid development of information and communication technology provides an opportunity for scientists to develop a quantitative analytical method that is built on a mobile gadget as a detector. In this paper, we report a low-cost, simple and portable analytical method for mercury ion quantification based on digital image colorimetry coupled with a smartphone application. A small amount of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) was used as a colorimetric agent that is selective only to mercury ions. The yellowish brown color of AgNPs instantly changed to colorless after the addition of mercury ions due to a redox reaction. To increase the portability, we attached the AgNPs onto a medium to create a paper-based analytical device. The final data processing of the colorimetric analysis was conducted using an android application available on the Google Play Store, called “Mercury Detector”. The proposed method has good sensitivity, with a detection limit of 0.86 ppb, which is comparable to those of bulk and more expensive instruments. This allows for the detection of mercury ions as low as 2 ppb (10 nM), which is also the maximum contaminant level permitted in drinking water by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The proposed method was applied to real samples that provide satisfactory results on accuracy (2.4%) and precision (2.5%).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Graduate School of Science Education, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
2 Material Science Research Group, Universitas BSI, Bandung 40291, Indonesia
3 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Uzbek Academy of Sciences, Tashkent 100214, Uzbekistan