It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Considering the representation of the atmosphere, the current generation of Earth-System Models (ESMs) differs mainly in the representation of the stratospheric ozone layer and its variability and changes. So-called high-top models have a well resolved stratosphere and typically calculate ozone chemistry interactively, low-top models on the other hand rely on parameterized ozone chemistry or prescribed climatological ozone fields and have a model top below the stratopause. Here we investigate whether interactive ozone chemistry is important for representing temperature variability and extremes in the Arctic polar stratosphere. To this end we analyze a suite of two 200 year sensitivity simulations, one with interactive ozone chemistry and one without, performed with the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model version 4 (WACCM4), a stratosphere-resolving version of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth-System Model. We find a tight coupling between ozone and temperatures over the Arctic polar cap, manifesting in increased variability in stratospheric spring-time temperatures in simulations with interactive chemistry compared to simulations imposing climatological mean ozone abundances. Our results indicate that stratospheric temperature extremes regularly occurring in simulations with interactive chemistry are absent in uncoupled model simulations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Chiodo, Gabriel 2
; Fritzer, Johannes 3 ; Wienerroither, Clemens 4 ; Polvani, Lorenzo M 5 1 Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change and IGAM/Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States of America
2 Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
3 Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change and IGAM/Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
4 Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change and IGAM/Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
5 Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States of America




