It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and localized non-hemorrhage iron deposits in the basal ganglia have been associated with brain aging, vascular disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Particularly, CMBs are small lesions and require multiple neuroimaging modalities for accurate detection. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) derived from in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to differentiate between iron content and mineralization. We set out to develop a deep learning-based segmentation method suitable for segmenting both CMBs and iron deposits. We included a convenience sample of 24 participants from the MESA cohort and used T2-weighted images, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and QSM to segment the two types of lesions. We developed a protocol for simultaneous manual annotation of CMBs and non-hemorrhage iron deposits in the basal ganglia. This manual annotation was then used to train a deep convolution neural network (CNN). Specifically, we adapted the U-Net model with a higher number of resolution layers to be able to detect small lesions such as CMBs from standard resolution MRI. We tested different combinations of the three modalities to determine the most informative data sources for the detection tasks. In the detection of CMBs using single class and multiclass models, we achieved an average sensitivity and precision of between 0.84–0.88 and 0.40–0.59, respectively. The same framework detected non-hemorrhage iron deposits with an average sensitivity and precision of about 0.75–0.81 and 0.62–0.75, respectively. Our results showed that deep learning could automate the detection of small vessel disease lesions and including multimodal MR data (particularly QSM) can improve the detection of CMB and non-hemorrhage iron deposits with sensitivity and precision that is compatible with use in large-scale research studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core (BINC), Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer’s & Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Antonio, USA (GRID:grid.267309.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0629 5880); University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
2 University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Bern, University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5734.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0726 5157)
3 University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
4 Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
5 University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
6 Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
7 Boston University, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.189504.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7558)
8 Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Texas at Austin, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
9 University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657)