Substituted N-(Pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides; Synthesis, Anti-Infective Evaluation, Cytotoxicity, and In Silico Studies

Abstract

We prepared a series of substituted N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides as an attempt to investigate the effect of different linkers connecting pyrazine to benzene cores on antimicrobial activity when compared to our previous compounds of amide or retro-amide linker type. Only two compounds, 4-amino-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (MIC = 6.25 μg/mL, 25 μM) and 4-amino-N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (MIC = 6.25 μg/mL, 22 μM) exerted good antitubercular activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv. However, they were excluded from the comparison as they—unlike the other compounds—possessed the pharmacophore for the inhibition of folate pathway, which was proven by docking studies. We performed target fishing, where we identified matrix metalloproteinase-8 as a promising target for our title compounds that is worth future exploration.

1. Introduction

Despite the availability of an effective treatment regimen against tuberculosis (TB), this infection remains the leading cause of death from infectious diseases worldwide [1]. Inaccessibility to treatment, poor adherence to the complex and lengthy treatment regimen, co-infection with HIV, and drug resistance all contribute to the lethality of this infection [1]. As a part of our long-term research on the derivatives of pyrazinamide (a first-line antitubercular) as potential antimycobacterial agents, we report the synthesis and anti-infective evaluation of a series of N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides (Figure 1c). Some of our previously prepared pyrazinecarboxamides exerted promising antimycobacterial activity (Figure 1a) [2,3]. As a follow-up, we are investigating different linkers connecting the pyrazine core to the aryl fragment and their effect on in vitro anti-infective activity. In the current series, we aim to study the influence of the isosteric replacement of the retro-amide moiety in our previously published series of N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzamides (Figure 1b) [4] by the sulfonamide moiety in title compounds. The detailed activity comparison between pyrazinecarboxamides (Figure 1a) and N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzamides (Figure 1b) is mentioned elsewhere [4].

Generally, sulfonamides exert a wide range of biological activities, including anti-tumoral [5], anti-inflammatory [6], anti-convulsant [7], and anti-infective [8], among others. Nevertheless, several compounds containing a pyrazine core directly connected to a sulfonamide moiety—like in our case—are already documented in the literature with a wide range of pharmacological applications [9]. Examples (Figure 2) include zibotentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist with antitumor activity for prostate cancer [10]; halogenated N-(pyrazinyl)benzenesulfonamides, which are clathrin-coated pit (CCP) chemokine receptor antagonists used in treating chemokine mediated diseases (such as asthma) [11]; and sulfamethoxypyrazine (sulfalene), which is an antibacterial sulfonamide agent [12]. As for antitubercular activity of sulfonamides, a fixed combination of sulfamethoxazole [4-amino-N-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)benzenesulfonamide]—trimethoprim [5-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine], also known as co-trimoxazole, has in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activity against drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), and it is used for such cases [13,14]. Sulfamethoxazole is a known inhibitor of bacterial dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), while trimethoprim is an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) [15,16].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The chemical synthesis entailed a simple one-step reaction in acetone with pyridine between different sulfonyl chlorides and aminopyrazine (series 1a–14a), or 6-chloroaminopyrazine (series 1b–13b), at room temperature overnight (Scheme 1). Compounds 4a and 4b were obtained by reducing compounds 3a and 3b, respectively. The purpose of attempting the synthesis with 6-chloroaminopyrazine, using the same sulfonyl chloride was to evaluate the effect of the chlorine atom on anti-infective activity. It is common knowledge that the introduction of a chlorine atom to a molecule increases its lipophilicity. For antimycobacterial activity, the lipophilicity of a compound is an essential factor since mycobacteria have thick, lipid-rich mycolic cell walls [17]. Besides, chloropyrazine derivatives, specifically anilides of 6-chloropyrazine-2-carboxylic acid, were proven previously to possess in vitro antimycobacterial activity [18,19].

The final products were purified using flash chromatography. They were isolated as solid compounds, in yields ranging from 12–70% of chromatographically pure products. Chlorinated compounds (series 1b–13b) had lower yields than the non-chlorinated ones (series 1a–14a) due to the electron-withdrawing property of the chlorine atom that reduces the strength of the primary amine as a nucleophile. The final products were characterized by melting points, ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR spectra, IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. The obtained analytical data fully supported the corresponding proposed structures. In the ¹H-NMR spectra, the signal of the sulfonamidic hydrogen appeared as a broad singlet at 12.10–10.27 ppm in DMSO-d₆. Pyrazine hydrogens appeared at 8.98–8.04 as two singlets in the case of chlorinated compounds (series 1b–13b), or a singlet and two doublets (J = 2.8–2.4 Hz) at 8.40–7.89 ppm in the case of non-chlorinated compounds (series 1a–14a). ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR spectra of compounds 6a and 6b are presented in supplementary materials. Regarding the IR spectra, the final compounds showed signals at 3105–2896 cm⁻¹ attributed to the sulfonamidic N–H stretch, at 1609–1460 cm⁻¹ attributed to the aromatic C=C stretch, at 1406–1324 cm⁻¹ attributed to the S=O unsymmetrical stretch, and at 1189–1092 cm⁻¹ attributed to the S=O symmetrical stretch.

2.2. Lipophilicity

Lipophilicity is a significant physico-chemical property in medicinal chemistry and drug design in general. As stated earlier, lipophilicity plays a significant role specifically in the development of new antituberculars. The log P values of prepared compounds were calculated using ChemDraw 18.1 (CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA). Calculated lipophilicity (log P) values were plotted against experimentally determined lipophilicity measures (log k). The measures were derived from retention times measured using reverse-phase HPLC. Both values agreed as shown in the graph below (Figure 3).

2.3. Acidobasic Properties

The acidic character of sulfonamide moiety determines the ionization state of title compounds at physiological pH and inside the mycobacteria. It further affects lipophilicity and transport across membranes. Three compounds 6b, 9b and 13b were selected and their pKa values were determined experimentally using potentiometric and absorbance methods (Table 2). The values of pKa in water were then predicted using different software to find the best value that gave the closest predictions to the actual experimentally determined values. ChemDraw was not able to predict pKa values, whereas values from the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE, Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, QC Canada)—software is available with a paid license only [21], were far from the experimental ones. Chemicalize was then used for the prediction of pKa values (September 2019, https://chemicalize.com/ developed by ChemAxon http://www.chemaxon.com). The latter values proved to be the closest to the experiments (Table 2), and therefore Chemicalize was selected to predict the pKa values of the remaining compounds (Table 3). The experimental pKa value of compound 4a was documented in the literature (pKa = 6.04) [22]. This value was close to our predicted value from the Chemicalize web application (pKa = 6.61).

2.4. Biological Activity

Six of our title compounds, namely 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, and 4b, have been previously mentioned in the literature. Compound 1a was evaluated as an inhibitor of B-raf kinase [23], compound 1b was evaluated as a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor [24], and compound 3a possessed potent in vitro and in vivo nuclease activity against Leishmania infantum promastigotes [25]. Furthermore, compound 4a—also known as sulfapyrazine—has an antibacterial profile comparable to sulfadiazine [26], a protective effect against sporozoite induced falciparum malaria [27], and sperm production and gonadal development stimulation in animals [28]. Compound 4b—also known as sulfaclozine—is a commonly used antiprotozoal to treat poultry coccidiosis [29]. It is important to note that compounds 4a and 4b were not tested previously against mycobacteria. Sulfaclozine was purchased later as standard. All title compounds were checked for the presence of PAINS and aggregator features using the ZINC15 utility (http://zinc15.docking.org/patterns/home). All the compounds were clear.

2.4.1. Antimycobacterial Activity Evaluation against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium avium

All synthesized compounds were evaluated for in vitro antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. kansasii, and M. avium using microplate alamar blue assay. The antimycobacterial activity results were expressed as a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in μg/mL against isoniazid (INH) as standard. Structurally related sulfonamides, namely, sulfamethoxazole, sulfaclozine, sulfaquinoxaline, and benzenesulfonamide were purchased and subjected to all anti-infective evaluations (Figure 4).

Based on the obtained data presented in Table 1, compounds 4a (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 25 μM) and 4b (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 22 μM) showed good antimycobacterial activity against Mtb. None of the other compounds had significant activity against Mtb. Compounds 4a and 4b are well-known inhibitors of bacterial dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) [30]. However, their antimycobacterial activity has so far not been investigated. Due to the high similarity of the bacterial and mycobacterial DHPS in the active sites [31], we concluded that the inhibition of Mtb growth might be due to the inhibition of mycobacterial DHPS. To rationalize this hypothesis, we used molecular docking to investigate the binding poses of these two compounds in the Mtb DHPS (PDB ID: 1eye). Even though mycobacterial DHPS showed only moderate overall amino acid sequence similarity (35 to 39%) to bacterial DHPS [32], the active sites in both DHPSs were highly conserved [31]. Since the only available structure of Mtb DHPS (PDB ID: 1eye) misses one of the key conserved flexible loops forming the binding site for a para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) fragment, as discussed and reviewed further elsewhere [33,34], we docked the hypothetical products of the DHPS-catalyzed condensation of studied compounds 4a and 4b with a natural substrate 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin diphosphate (HMDPdiP, Figure 5) This was done to overcome the inaccuracies that could arise from flexible loop homology modelling. The formation of such a condensed product was described in Bacillus anthracis DHPS (PDB ID: 3tye) containing condensed sulfathiazole products [33], where it had also been rationalized using quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations [35]. For more details on the docking experiments, refer to in silico studies from the materials and methods section. With regards to the pKa values of the sulfonamide moiety (Table 2 and Table 3), as well as the proposed mechanism of action (competitive inhibition with DHPS natural substrate—deprotonated PABA), the hypothetical products (Figure 5) of compounds 4a and 4b were docked as deprotonated sulfonamides.

The docking experiments showed two main potential positions with the poses scoring from −7.9 to −8.3. Positions with the pyrazine core filling the cavity above the active site to the right (formed by Gly181 and Arg214 as seen in Figure 6) had a slightly better score than the positions with the pyrazine to the left. This outcome was probably due to the hydrogen bonds between sulfonamide oxygen and the Arg214 backbone. Similar interactions to Ser221 (corresponding to Arg214 of the mycobacterial DHPS) was also seen in the DHPS of Bacillus anthracis for 7,8-dihydropteroate (in this case to the carbonyl oxygen of the carboxylate, PDB ID: 3tya), and it also occurred between the sulfathiazole product (PDB ID: 3tye). On the other hand, poses pointing to the pyrazine to the left had the pyrazine favorably positioned for hydrogen bonding with the guanidine group of Arg233. As seen in Figure 6, substitution of the pyrazine ring with chlorine does not have a significant effect on the predicted binding mode, which justifies the similar antimycobacterial activity of the non-chlorinated compound 4a (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 25 μM) to the chlorinated compound 4b (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 22 μM) against Mtb.

Compounds 2a (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 25 μg/mL, 85.5 μM), 2b (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 25 μg/mL, 76.5 μM), 11b (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 25 μg/mL, 76.3 μM), and 12b (MIC_{M kansasii} = 12.5 μg/mL, 36.1 μM), had selective antitubercular activity against M. kansasii, and it was higher than INH (MIC of INH was 25 μg/mL, 182.3 μM). For compounds 2a and 2b, particularly, this activity was relatable to its chemical structure. The acetamido moiety may have worked as a pro-drug that was later hydrolyzed (supposedly by M. kansasii amidase) to the free amino group. This is essential for anti-infective activity based on interference with the folate synthesis pathway [36]. The fact that compounds 2a and 2b were inactive against other mycobacterial strains suggested that the hydrolysis machinery in the latter strains was inefficient to liberate the free amino forms due to the difference between substrate specificity of the mycobacterial amidases among different mycobacterial strains [37,38]. It must be noted that the pharmacokinetic profile of compound 4a in man is already established and it shows that compound 2a is the major metabolite of compound 4a [39]. Compounds 4a (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 1.56 μg/mL, 6.2 μM) and 4b (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 12.5 μg/mL, 44 μM) were also found to be more potent than INH against M. kansasii. The addition of the chlorine atom and subsequent increased lipophilicity had a positive effect on antimycobacterial activity against M. kansasii, as seen with compounds 11a (inactive; MIC_{M. kansasii} > 100 μg/mL, 305.1 μM) vs. 11b (active; MIC_{M. kansasii} = 25 μg/mL, 76.3 μM), and 12a (inactive; MIC_{M. kansasii} = 100 μg/mL, 321.2 μM) vs. 12b (active; MIC_{M. kansasii} = 12.5 μg/mL, 36.1 μM). Compound 4b (MIC_{M. avium} = 25 μg/mL, 88 μM) was the only compound to exert antimycobacterial activity against M. avium, making it the broadest agent in the spectrum of activity among prepared compounds. Sulfamethoxazole showed potent antimycobacterial activity against Mtb (MIC_Mtb = 3.13 μg/mL, 12 μM, less potent than INH), M. kansasii (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 3.13 μg/mL, 12 μM, more potent than INH), and M. avium (MIC_{M. avium} = 12.5 μg/mL, 49 μM, more potent than INH). As for sulfaclozine, its MIC values fully matched that of our freshly prepared compound 4b, sulfaquinoxaline, which was similar to sulfaclozine in possessing anticoccidiosis activity [40]. It also showed good antimycobacterial activity, while benzenesulfonamide, a classic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor [41], was completely inactive against these three strains.

Estimated pKa values showed no direct correlation with antimycobacterial activity. pKa values of compounds that exhibited antimycobacterial activity were scattered and could not be put in range. Despite having the same pKa value of 7.14, compound 13a was active against M. smegmatis (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL) while compound 1a was inactive (MIC ≥ 250 μg/mL). The electron-withdrawing property of the additional chlorine atom increased the acidity of the sulfonamidic hydrogen as indicated by lower estimated pKa values, as compared to the corresponding non-chlorinated compounds.

When we sought to compare title compounds to pyrazinecarboxamides (amides) and N-pyrazinylbenzamides (retro-amides)—which was our main objective—we found that substitution with the sulfonamide bridge, in general, did not improve the antimycobacterial activity. Compounds 4a and 4b were excluded from this comparison as they probably exerted their antimycobacterial activity through a different pathway (folate pathway) than the rest of the title compounds. To achieve a more precise assessment, we compared the antimycobacterial activity against Mtb of title sulfonamides to the activity of amides and retro-amides bearing the same substitution both on the pyrazine (R¹) and benzene (R²) ring. It was apparent that the sulfonamide bridge had no positive influence on activity. Some of the antimycobacterial activity against other mycobacterial strains was missing from previous compounds; therefore, we focused on the activity against Mtb (Table 4). We note that the methodologies used for MIC determination of amides were not identical to the updated methods used for the retro-amides and title sulfonamides. Therefore, the comparisons should not be taken as a comparison of precise MIC values but as an assessment of general trends instead.

2.4.2. Antimycobacterial Activity Evaluation against Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium aurum

The full series was evaluated for antimycobacterial activity against two fast-growing mycobacterial strains; M. smegmatis and M. aurum. The latter two strains have the advantage of being avirulent surrogate organisms with better safety profiles and shorter replication time in comparison to M. tuberculosis [26]. Microplate alamar blue assay was used for this test against INH, rifampicin, and ciprofloxacin as standards. The most active compounds against M. smegmatis were compounds 13a (MIC_{M. smegmatis} = 62.5 μg/mL, 219 μM), and interestingly, benzenesulfonamide (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 31.25 μg/mL, 199 μM), which was inactive against the slow-growing strains of mycobacteria. Some compounds besides sulfaclozine, sulfaquinoxaline, and benzenesulfonamide showed moderate to low activity (MIC_{M. aurum} = 125–150 μg/mL) against M. aurum.

2.4.3. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity Evaluation

All prepared compounds were screened in vitro for biological activity against four Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis) and four Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacterial strains and eight fungal strains (Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Absidia corymbifera, Trichophyton interdigitale) using microplate dilution assay with MICs determined by the naked eye. No antibacterial or antifungal activities were observed for any of the tested compounds up to the highest tested concentration (500 μM). Compounds 4a and 4b satisfied the sulfonamide structural requirements for antibacterial activity [36], yet in our testing, they exerted solely antimycobacterial activity. These findings were consistent with the standard used for screening. Sulfamethoxazole had antimycobacterial activity, but it was not active against any of the tested bacterial strains. The antibacterial activity of the mentioned sulfonamides might be present at concentrations beyond the concentration scale (500–0.97 μM) that we used for such evaluations. In general, the single use of sulfamethoxazole as a quality standard is discouraged due to the low or absence of activity. If it is to be used, then it shall be combined with trimethoprim [42].

2.4.4. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assays

Since zibotentan is a pyrazine containing sulfonamide with cytotoxic activity, our compounds were evaluated for similar activity in standard HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) cell line. Furthermore, established antituberculars are known to carry a risk of hepatotoxicity; thus, such evaluations provide an insight into the hepatotoxic effect of the intended compound. Obtained results were expressed by the inhibitory concentration required to decrease the viability of the cell population to 50% (IC₅₀) compared to a control of 100% cell viability (Table 1). The used CellTiter 96 assay was based on the reduction of tetrazolium dye MTS in living cells to formazan, which was then determined colorimetrically. Based on the obtained results, none of the prepared compounds exerted significant in vitro cytotoxicity (IC₅₀ > 100 µM). Compounds with the chlorine atom (series 1b–13b) were usually more cytotoxic than their corresponding non-chlorinated homologs (series 1a–14a). The most toxic compound among all series was compound 9b (IC₅₀ = 179.5 µM) (Figure 7). When compared to amides and retro-amides, sulfonamides exerted a lesser extent of in vitro cytotoxicity [2,3,4].

2.4.5. Exploring Potential Targets and Activities using Docking Studies

Although designed as potential antimycobacterial compounds, the sulfonamides presented in this paper only exerted low antimycobacterial activity (with the exception of 4a and 4b, as discussed above). To discover new potential uses for our compounds, we ran a target fishing campaign based on structural similarity between our N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzensulfonamides and ligands from the RCSB PDB database. First, potential targets were searched in the RCSB database, and then the title compounds were docked into the selected enzymes, after which poses of the molecules were investigated to establish their possible activities. For details of the target fishing and docking procedures, refer to in silico studies from the materials and methods section.

The search yielded six targets, as presented in Table S1 in supplementary materials. Among these was DHPS, which we have already investigated when determining the mechanism of action of compounds 4a and 4b. Then we selected three targets from the remaining five to explore further. Compound 1a and its derivatives have already been patented as potential inhibitors of B-raf kinase [23]. We then docked our compound into GTPase KRas, with no interesting results. Finally, matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8; also known as neutrophil collagenase; PDB ID: 5h8x), was investigated in more detail, where its recently described inhibitors are of the above-mentioned structural type (Ar-SONH₂-Ar) [43]. This endopeptidase is a part of a very complex proteolytic MMP enzyme family, where its overexpression was linked to several pathological processes [43]. As several articles have already described the coordination of metals by pyrazines [44,45], we investigated whether the pyrazine in our compounds could coordinate the Zn²⁺ ion in the MMP-8. This could promote potential inhibitory activity on MMP-8, as presented by Tauro et al. [43]. We tested this hypothesis using molecular docking studies. The results showed that in compounds 2a (Figure 8) and 12a (not presented), one of the pyrazine nitrogens was favorably positioned above the Zn²⁺ ion, at a distance of 2.19 Å (comparable to the distance of the His-Zn²⁺ coordinate), as we presumed. Thus, it could easily coordinate the Zn²⁺ in the receptor cavity (Figure 8). In the majority of poses, N1′ was interacting with the metal ion, as seen in Figure 8. The interaction of Zn²⁺ and N4′ was observed only in some poses of 12a. This interaction in addition to the interactions of the sulfonamide moiety was identical to the interactions observed in the original catechol ligand (hydrogen bonds with backbones of Ala161 and Leu160). This in turn gave the basis for the presumed inhibitory activity of our ligands and promoted their further evaluation as inhibitors of MMP-8 or other enzymes of the MMP family.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All chemicals were of reagent or higher grade of purity. They were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany) unless stated otherwise. The progress of reactions was checked using Merck Silica 60 F₂₅₄ TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with UV detection at wavelength 254 nm. Microwave-assisted reactions were performed in a CEM Discover microwave reactor with a focused field (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA) connected to an Explorer 24 autosampler (CEM Corporation). This equipment was running under CEM’s Synergy^TM software for setting and monitoring the conditions of reactions. An internal infrared sensor monitored the temperature of the reaction mixture. All obtained products were purified by a preparative flash chromatograph CombiFlash^® Rf (Teledyne Isco Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) or preparative flash chromatograph Puriflash 420 XS (Intechim Chemicals, Montlucon, France). The type of elution was gradient, using a mixture of hexane (LachNer, Neratovice, Czech Republic) and ethyl acetate (Penta, Prague, Czech Republic) as the mobile phase. Silica gel (0.040–0.063 mm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as the stationary phase. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian VNMR S500 (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 500 MHz for ¹H and 125 MHz for ¹³C. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm (δ) and were referred indirectly to tetramethylsilane via a signal of solvent (2.49 for ¹H and 39.7 for ¹³C in DMSO-d₆). Infrared spectra were recorded by a spectrometer FT-IR Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) methodology on a germanium crystal. Elemental analysis was performed on a vario MICRO cube element analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau, Germany). All values regarding elemental analyses were given as percentages. Melting points were determined in open capillary on the Stuart SMP30 melting point apparatus (Bibby Scientific Limited, Staffordshire, UK) and were uncorrected. Yields were expressed as percentages of the theoretical yield, and they referred to the isolated products after all purification steps.

3.2. Synthesis

3.2.1. Synthesis of Final Compounds, General Procedure

In a 50 mL beaker, aminopyrazine (3 mmol, 285 mg) or 6-chloroaminopyrazine (3 mmol, 388 mg) was dissolved in 1 mL anhydrous pyridine with stirring at room temperature. Pyridine was used to neutralize the hydrochloric acid generated upon reacting the sulfonyl chloride reagent with the corresponding aminopyrazine or 6-chloroaminopyrazine. Corresponding benzensulfonyl chloride (3 mmol) was dissolved in approximately 2 mL of acetone in a 50 mL pear-shaped beaker with stirring at room temperature. Then the dissolved content in pyridine was added dropwise to the dissolved benzensulfonyl chloride in acetone with stirring at room temperature. The system was then sealed with an appropriate stopper and left to react overnight under the same conditions. The next day, the completion of the reaction was checked by TLC in a 3:1 EtOAc/hexane system. The reaction mixture was transferred to a 100 mL beaker and washed with distilled water to minimize any losses. Then the content was acidified with 10% (m/m) HCl drop-wise until a solid precipitate was formed, which represented the non-ionized form of the product. The acidification step was aimed at ionizing the added pyridine, and any unreacted aminopyrazine or 6-chloroaminopyrazine, to form a salt that dissolved in the aqueous layer during the subsequent extraction step. EtOAc was added as little as needed (30 mL) to dissolve the formed solid precipitate. Distilled water was then added (30 mL) and the two phases were mixed vigorously at room temperature and then transferred to a 500 mL separating funnel. The two layers were then allowed to settle and were separated into two 250 mL beakers. The aqueous layer was rewashed with EtOAc (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers from all extractions were then washed one last time with distilled water (100 mL) and then with brine (30 mL). The final organic layer was then transferred to a 150 mL beaker (or less based on the obtained overall volume) and stirred with magnesium sulfate (4 mmol, 500 mg) as a desiccant for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, the dispersion was filtrated through cotton and the resulting filtrate was adsorbed to silica gel to perform flash chromatography using gradient elution 0% to 100% EtOAc in hexane with 0.01% acetic acid as the mobile phase modifier.

3.2.2. Compounds 4a and 4b

Compounds 3a and 3b (1 mmol) were reduced to the corresponding 4-amino-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides (4a and 4b, respectively) with SnCl₂ dihydrate (1.8 g, 8 mmol) in 10 mL of ethanol with stirring under reflux (80 °C, 30 min). The solvent was evaporated under vacuum and the obtained solid was dissolved in EtOAc (10 mL), and then washed with water (2 × 10 mL) and brine (1 × 5 mL). The final organic layer was then transferred to a 50 mL beaker (or less based on the estimated overall volume) and stirred with magnesium sulfate (2 mmol, 250 mg) as a desiccant for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, the dispersion was filtrated with cotton and the filtrate was adsorbed to silica gel to perform flash chromatography using gradient elution 0% to 100% EtOAc in hexane.

3.3. Analytical Data of the Prepared Compounds

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (1a). White solid. Yield 68%; M.p. 203–205 °C {in the literature 204–208 °C [25]}; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2956 (NH stretch), 1587, 1558, 1532 (arom. stretch), 1345 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1092 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.02 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.12 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.04 (d, J = 2.8, 2H, pyrazine), 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.14 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.01 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.3, 142.3, 140.1, 139.1, 135.1, 133.4, 129.4, 127.2. Elemental analysis found: C, 51.33%; H, 3.87%; N, 17.60%; S, 13.98%. Calculated for C₁₀H₉N₃O₂S (MW 235.26): C, 51.05%; H, 3.86%; N, 17.86%; S, 13.63%. CAS#7471-20-7.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (1b). White solid. Yield 41%; M.p. 198–200.2 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2940 (NH stretch), 1570, 1526, 1499 (arom. stretch), 1398 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1163 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.96 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.40 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.24 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.05–7.89 (m, 2H, arom.), 7.74–7.62 (m, 1H, arom.), 7.66–7.53 (m, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 147.5, 145.6, 139.4, 137.5, 133.8, 132.6, 129.5, 127.5. Elemental analysis found: C, 44.23%; H, 2.98%; N, 15.37%; S, 11.76%. Calculated for C₁₀H₈ClN₃O₂S (MW 269.70): C, 44.53%; H, 2.99%; N, 15.58%; S, 11.89%. CAS#887310-35-2.

N-(4-(N-(pyrazin-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)acetamide (2a). Beige solid. Yield 84%; M.p. 243.8–245.6 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 3105 (NH stretch), 1592, 1558, 1532 (arom. stretch), 1406 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1162 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.42 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 10.32 (s, 1H, acetylamide), 8.34 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.21 (d, J = 2.8, 2H, pyrazine), 7.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.74 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, arom.), 2.06 (s, 3H, –CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 169.2, 148.4, 143.7, 142.3, 138.9, 134.9, 133.5, 128.7, 118.7, 24.3. Elemental analysis found: C, 49.11%; H, 4.05%; N, 18.98%; S, 10.90%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₃S (MW 292.31): C, 49.31%; H, 4.14%; N, 19.17%, S, 10.97%.

N-(4-(N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)sulfamoyl)phenyl)acetamide (2b). White solid. Yield 65%; M.p. 217.9–219.9 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 3043 (NH stretch), 1592, 1527, 1501 (arom. stretch), 1400 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1164 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.90 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 10.54 (bs, 1H, acetylamide), 8.30 (s, 2H, pyrazine), 7.89 (m, 4H, arom.), 2.07 (s, 3H, –CH₃).¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 169.4, 147.6, 145.6, 144.0, 137.1, 132.7, 132.5, 129.0, 118.6, 24.3. Elemental analysis found: C, 44.50%; H, 3.41%; N, 17.24%; S, 9.99%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₁ClN₄O₃S (MW 326.76): C, 44.11%; H, 3.39%; N, 17.15%; S, 9.81%.

4-nitro-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (3a). Yield 69%; M.p. 230.8–231.8 °C {in the literature 233–237 °C [25]}; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2990 (NH stretch), 1565, 1544, 1524 (arom. stretch), 1371 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1160 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 12.10 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.98 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.35 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.87 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.14 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 151.2, 147.9, 145.9, 141.4, 134.1, 135.6, 129.4, 124.8. Elemental analysis found: C, 42.80%; H, 2.65%; N, 19.79% S, 11.13%. Calculated for C₁₀H₈N₄O₄S (MW 280.26): C, 42.86%; H, 2.88%; N, 19.99%; S, 11.44%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (3b). Yield 57%; M.p. 218.1–219.8 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2899 (NH stretch), 1535, 1514, 1494 (arom. stretch), 1391 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1105 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.89 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.47 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.28 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.18 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.89 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 156.1, 151.7, 145.7, 144, 135.4, 134.1, 128, 128, 124.5, 124.5. Elemental analysis found: C, 37.88%; H, 2.05%; N, 17.79% S, 10.13%. Calculated for C₁₀H₇ClN₄O₄S (MW 314.70): C, 38.17%; H, 2.24%; N, 17.80%; S, 10.19%.

4-amino-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (4a). White powder. Yield 87%; M.p. 254–255.8 °C {in the literature 257–259 °C [46]}; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2961 (NH stretch), 1575, 1561, 1520 (arom. stretch), 1354 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1164 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.96 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.62 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.14 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.72 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.), 6.52 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.), 5.6 (bs, 2H, amino). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 150.1, 147.9, 145.7, 141.9, 139.3, 135.6, 129, 124.7. Elemental analysis found: C, 47.88%; H, 4.01%; N, 22.16% S, 12.62%. Calculated for C₁₀H₈N₄O₄S (MW 250.28): C, 47.99%; H, 4.03%; N, 22.39%; S, 12.81%. CAS#116-44-9.

4-amino-N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (4b). Light yellow solid. Yield 81%; M.p. 234.7–236.1 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 3442, 3365 (NH₂ stretch), 2929 (NH stretch), 1585, 1564, 1524 (arom. stertch), 1361 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1150 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.06 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.22 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.14 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.48 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.), 6.89 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, arom.), 6.02 (bs, 2H, amino). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 152.1, 148.9, 145.5, 142.4, 139.2, 134.9, 128.4, 123.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 41.88%; H, 3.05%; N, 19.86% S, 11.23%. Calculated for C₁₀H₉ClN₄O₂S (MW 284.72): C, 42.19%; H, 3.19%; N, 19.68%; S, 11.26%. CAS#102-65-8.

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide (5a). White solid. Yield 41%; M.p. 154.3–155.5 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2926 (NH stretch), 1609, 1590, 1532 (arom. stretch), 1324 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1145 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 10.27 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.53 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.40 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 8.04 (m, J = 7.8, 1.8, 0.9 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.89 (m, J = 8.7, 7.5, 0.7 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.8, 142.8, 142.5, 140.5, 136.4, 132.3, 131.4, 130.8, 125.5.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide (5b). Orange solid. Yield 29%; M.p. 125–127.2 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2930 (NH stretch), 1589, 1525, 1495 (arom. stretch), 1397 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1159 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 12.10 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.31 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.26 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.18 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.68 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 151.7, 147.3, 145.6, 138.4, 137.6, 132.8 (q, J = 31 Hz), 130.4, 121.5 (q, J = 272.1 Hz), 121.0 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 118.9 (q, J = 4.2 Hz).

4-methoxy-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (6a). White solid. Yield 89%; M.p. 231.5–233.9 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2924 (NH stretch), 1596, 1578, 1531 (arom. stretch), 1344 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1158 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.30 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.30 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.18 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.78 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.64 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, arom.), 4.12 (s, 3H, –OCH₃). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 162.9, 148.4, 142.3, 138.9, 134.9, 131.6, 129.6, 114.5, 55.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 51.12%; H, 4.20%; N, 15.98%; S, 12.12%. Calculated for C₁₁H₁₁N₃O₃S (MW 265.29): C, 49.80%; H, 4.18%; N, 15.84%; S, 12.09%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide (6b). White solid. Yield 54%; 185.1–186.3 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2994 (NH stretch), 1579, 1524, 1501 (arom. stretch), 1398 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1164 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.91 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.31 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.95 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.45 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.), 6.98 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, arom.), 3.81–3.79 (m, 3H, -OCH₃-). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 163.2, 147.6, 145.7, 137.1, 132.4, 130.9, 123.0, 114.6, 55.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 44.48%; H, 3.30%; N, 14.14%; S, 10.56%. Calculated for C₁₁H₁₀ClN₃O₃S (MW 299.73): C, 44.08%; H, 3.36%; N, 14.02%; S, 10.70%.

4-bromo-N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (7b). Beige solid. Yield 41%; M.p. 176.5–179.3 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2925 (NH stretch), 1574, 1525, 1497 (arom. stretch), 1396 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1153 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 12.07 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.36 (s, 2H, pyrazine), 7.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.84 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 147.3, 145.6, 138.8, 137.6, 132.7, 132.5, 129.6, 127.7. Elemental analysis found: C, 34.56%; H, 2.10%; N, 12.01%; S, 8.96%. Calculated for C₁₀H₇BrClN₃O₂S (MW 348.60): C, 34.46%; H, 2.02%; N, 12.05%; S, 9.20%.

3,5-dimethyl-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8a). White solid. Yield 56%; M.p. 184–187 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2958 (NH stretch), 1588, 1530, 1504 (arom. stretch), 1345 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1189 (S=O symmetrical stretch). ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.30 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.30 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.88 (s, 1H, arom.), 7.74 (s, 2H, arom.), 2.34 (s, 6H, –CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.3, 142.4, 140.1, 139.8, 139, 135, 134.8, 124.6, 20.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 55.34%; H, 4.91%; N, 15.66%; S, 12.30%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₂S (MW 263.32): C, 54.74%; H, 4.98%; N, 15.96%; S, 12.18%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-3,5-dimethylbenzenesulfonamide (8b). Dark yellow-brownish solid. Yield 25%; M.p. 148.1–150.1 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2930 (NH stretch), 1573, 1525, 1494 (arom. stretch), 1394 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1159 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.82 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.35 (s, 2H, pyrazine), 7.58 (s, 2H, arom.), 7.35 (s, 1H, arom.), 2.38 (s, 6H, –CH₃).¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ147.5, 145.6, 139.2, 138.9, 137.2, 135.1, 132.8, 125.2, 20.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 48.35%; H, 4.49%; N, 14.15%; S, 10.05%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₂ClN₃O₂S (MW 297.03): C, 48.41%; H, 4.06%; N, 14.11%; S, 10.77%.

2,4,6-trimethyl-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (9a). White solid. Yield 67%; M.p. 200–201.9 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2949 (NH stretch), 1601, 1586, 1530 (arom. stretch), 1337 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1154 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.52 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.22 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.08 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.01 (s, 2H, arom.), 2.64 (s, 6H, -CH₃), 2.22 (s, 3H, -CH₃).¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.9, 142.5, 142.0, 139.4, 138.1, 134.2, 134.1, 131.8, 22.4, 20.6. Elemental analysis found: C, 56.22%; H, 5.42%; N, 14.88%; S, 11.92%. Calculated for C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₂S (MW 277.34): C, 56.30%; H, 5.45%; N, 15.15%; S, 11.56%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide (9b). Beige solid. Yield 45%; M.p. 179.7–180.2 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2925 (NH stretch), 1566, 1525, 1498 (arom. stretch), 1331 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1186 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.95 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.24 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.15 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.04 (s, 2H, arom.), 2.66 (s, 6H, –CH₃), 2.24 (s, 3H, –CH₃).¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 156.8, 145.1, 144.9, 141.1, 137.2, 135.1, 134.9, 130.4, 22.6, 21.9. Elemental analysis found: C, 49.87%; H, 4.51%; N, 13.11%; S, 9.99%. Calculated for C₁₃H₁₄ClN₃O₂S (MW 311.78): C, 50.08%; H, 4.53%; N, 13.48%; S, 10.28%.

2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (10a). White solid. Yield 49%; M.p. 221–223.7 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2955 (NH stretch), 1585, 1526, 1500 (arom. stretch), 1362 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1174 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.55 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.18 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.09 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.23 (s, 1H, arom.), 2.55 (s, 6H, –CH₃), 2.21 (s, 6H, –CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.9, 142.1, 138.1, 135.9, 135.7, 135.3, 134.6, 134.0, 20.7, 17.5. Elemental analysis found: C, 57.45%; H, 5.79%; N, 14.08%; S, 10.72%. Calculated for C₁₄H₁₇N₃O₂S (MW 291.37): C, 57.71%; H, 5.88%; N, 14.42%; S, 11.00%.

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-6-sulfonamide (11a). Light yellow solid. Yield 17%; M.p. 264–267.1 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2930 (NH stretch), 1591, 1569, 1540 (arom. stretch), 1350 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1161 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.41 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.35 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.21 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.44 (s, 1H, arom.), 6.98 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, arom.), 4.33–4.25 (m, 4H, –CH₂–). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 156.2, 153.9, 147.0, 144.5, 137.4, 136.1, 131.9, 117.3, 115.3, 111.9, 64.2. Elemental analysis found: C, 49.47%; H, 3.97%; N, 14.55%; S, 10.87%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₀N₃O₄S (MW 293.30): C, 49.14%; H, 3.78%; N, 14.33%; S, 10.93%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxine-6-sulfonamide (11b). White solid. Yield 8%; M.p. 244.6–247°C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2896 (NH stretch), 1580, 1529, 1498 (arom. stretch), 1323 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1162 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.81 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.34 (s, 2H, pyrazine), 8.28 (s, 1H, arom.), 7.41 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, arom.), 4.42–4.26 (m, 4H, –CH₂–). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) 156.8, 153.9, 147.0, 144.9, 135.1, 134.9, 131.9, 117.3, 115.3, 111.9, 64.2. Elemental analysis found: C, 43.74%; H, 3.01%; N, 12.54%; S, 9.54%. Calculated for C₁₂H₁₀ClN₃O₄S (MW 327.74): C, 43.98%; H, 3.08%; N, 12.82%; S, 9.78%.

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-sulfonamide (12a). Light yellow solid. Yield 79%; M.p. 242.2–244.3 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 3070 (NH stretch), 1594, 1566, 1531 (arom. stretch), 1345 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1172 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.62 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.40 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.24 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.79 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 4H, arom.), 7.65 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.39 (t, J = 9 Hz, 3H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.3, 144.9, 142.4, 139.1, 138.9, 138.5, 135.1, 129.3, 128.8, 128.0, 127.6, 127.3. Elemental analysis found: C, 61.32%; H, 4.21%; N, 13.01%; S, 10.30%. Calculated for C₁₆H₁₃N₃O₂S (MW 311.36): C, 61.72%; H, 4.21%; N, 13.50%; S, 10.30%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-sulfonamide (12b). White solid. Yield 40%; M.p. 229.3–230.3 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2937 (NH stretch), 1596, 1566, 1525 (arom.), 1397 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1159 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 12.01 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.34 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.14 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 7.49 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 4H, arom.), 7.25 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, arom.), 7.04 (t, J = 9 Hz, 3H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 147.5, 145.7, 145.2, 138.4, 138.2, 137.5, 132.6, 129.3, 128.9, 128.3, 127.6, 127.3. Elemental analysis found: C, 55.74%; H, 3.54%; N, 12.48%; S, 9.41%. Calculated for C₁₆H₁₂ClN₃O₂S (MW 345.80): C, 55.57%; H, 3.50%; N, 12.15%; S, 9.27%.

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)naphthalene-2-sulfonamide (13a). White solid. Yield 57%; M.p. 223.5–224.7 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2925 (stretch NH), 1589, 1576, 1530 (arom. stretch), 1341 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1160 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.67 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.77 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.65 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.92 (m, 3H, arom.), 7.68 (m, 4H, arom.).¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 148.3, 142.3, 139.1, 137.1, 135.1, 134.6, 131.7, 129.6, 129.5, 129.3, 128.8, 128.0, 127.9, 122.4. Elemental analysis found: C, 58.91%; H, 3.89%; N, 14.38%; S, 11.61%. Calculated for C₁₄H₁₁N₃O₂S (MW 285.32): C, 58.94%; H, 3.89%; N, 14.73%; S, 11.24%.

N-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)naphthalene-2-sulfonamide (13b). Light yellow. Yield 33%; M.p. 204.6–207 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 3056 (NH stretch), 1522, 1505, 1460 (arom. stretch), 1398 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1169 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 12.05 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.35 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.30 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.20 (m, arom.), 7.93 (m, 3H, arom.), 7.76–7.64 (m, 4H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 156.0, 147.5, 146.0, 145.6, 137.4, 136.3, 134.7, 132.5, 131.6, 130.6, 129.6, 129.6, 128.7, 128.0, 128.0. Elemental analysis found: C, 52.89%; H, 3.10%; N, 13.07%; S, 10.04%. Calculated for C₁₄H₁₀ClN₃O₂S (MW 319.76): C, 52.59%; H, 3.15%; N, 13.14%; S, 10.03%.

N-(pyrazin-2-yl)quinoline-6-sulfonamide (14a). Beige solid. Yield 61%; M.p. 249.4–252 °C; IR (ATR-Ge, cm⁻¹): 2927 (NH stretch), 1585, 1552, 1533 (arom. stretch), 1339 (S=O unsymmetrical stretch), 1159 (S=O symmetrical stretch); ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ 11.53 (bs, 1H, sulfonamide), 8.87 (s, 1H, pyrazine), 8.66 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, pyrazine), 7.99–7.14 (m, 6H, arom.). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) 153.1, 151.6, 147.5, 143.2, 137.1, 136.5, 136.0, 135.2, 131.7, 131.6, 128.6, 126.0, 122.8. Elemental analysis found: C, 54.82%; H, 3.37%; N, 19.77%; S, 10.40%. Calculated for C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₂S (MW 286.31): C, 54.54%; H, 3.52%; N, 19.57%; S, 11.20%.

3.4. Log k Determination

Log k was determined using an Agilent Technologies 1200 SL liquid chromatograph with a Diode-array Detector SL G1315C (Agilent Technologies Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA), with pre-column ZORBAX XDB-C18 5 µm, 4 mm × 4 mm and column ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 5 µm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm (both Agilent Technologies Inc.). The mobile phase consisted of MeOH (HPLC grade, 70%) and H₂O (HPLC-Milli-Q Grade, 30%) with 0.01% acetic acid as the mobile phase modifier. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and samples were injected at a volume of 20 µL, where the column temperature was 30 °C. The detection and monitoring wavelengths were 210 nm and 270 nm, respectively. Retention times (R_t) were measured in minutes. The dead time of the system (D_t) was determined as the retention time of the KI methanolic solution. Capacity factors k for individual compounds were calculated according to the formula k = (R_t − D_t)/D_t. Capacity factor k was converted to the log scale and (log k), and it was used as a measure of lipophilicity.

3.5. pKa Determination

For the spectrophotometric method, 1 μM solution of the compound in question was prepared in methanol. The spectra of the sample at several (at least seven) different pH values were measured against blank (water) using a Helios spectrophotometer (Unicam Cambridge). The pH valued covered the region in which all sample molecules were converted from ionized to molecular form or vice versa. Each cuvette contained 200 μL of the sample solution and 1.8 mL of the corresponding buffer. The pH values used and the absorbances allowed us to calculate the pKa of the sample according to the following equation:

$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{Ka}=\mathrm{pH}+\log \left(\frac{Ai-A}{A-Au}\right)$

where A is the absorbance of the compound at the corresponding buffer, Ai is the absorbance of the ionized state of the compound and Au is the absorbance of the unionized state. The final pKa was the average of all the pKa at different pH values. For the potentiometric measurements, 1 μM solution of the compound in question was prepared in 3:2 water:methanol, with the addition of 100 μL of 0.1% NaOH. Then small amounts (100 μL) of 0.01% HCl were added repeatedly and the pH was measured each time using a pH meter (inoLab^® pH 7110 Czech Republic). The inflection point of the titration curve determined the pKa. Each compound was measured two times and the resulting pKa was the average of two values.

3.6. Biological Assays

For details, refer to the supplementary materials.

3.7. In Silico Studies

3.7.1. DHPS Docking

For the docking studies, we used the rigid receptor settings of the template docking feature incorporated in MOE 2019.0101 (Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Canada) [21]. For the template, all heavy atoms of the pteridine core were selected as these atoms, in reality, were already inside the enzyme. The compounds were docked to the publicly available structure of Mtb DHPS (PDB ID: 1eye). Final refinement (Refinement: Rigid) of the pose was done using the default GBVI/WSA dG scoring function. To test the ability of such settings to predict the correct binding poses, we docked 7,8-dihydropteroate using the same settings, and we observed correct interactions of the p-aminobenzoic acid carboxylic group. This was as seen in the crystallographic structures of such products in, for example, Burkholderia cenocepacia DHPS (PDB ID: 2y5s) or Bacillus anthracis DHPS (PDB ID: 3tya).

3.7.2. Target Fishing

For the target fishing, we searched the RCSB PDB database (https://www.rcsb.org/) for ligands containing benzenesulfonamide moiety using the ‘Ligand search’ utility. The obtained ligands were imported into the MOE database (MOE 2019.0101) [21] and then filtered using the SMARTS string “cS(O)(O)[NH]c” to retrieve ligands that met the aromatic-SONH-aromatic scaffold. The resulting database was used for similarity searching based on the MACCS structural keys (bit-packed) with Tanimoto > 0.75, based on compound 1a as a template. The resulting compounds were inspected visually to remove all unrelated compounds, e.g., compounds with a highly substituted aromatic ring. Ligands in the final selection were searched in the RCSB PDB database for the associated co-crystalized targets, which were considered candidate targets for the title molecules of this manuscript.

3.7.3. Other Targets Docking

For the docking study, we used the MOE 2019.0101 [21]. The docking was carried out on a rigid receptor using default dock settings. The poses generated by the Triangle Matcher placement method were scored using the London dG function. The best poses were refined (Refinement: Rigid) and scored using the GBVI/WSA dG scoring function. Concerning the predicted pKa values of our compounds, the deprotonated forms were used as ligands.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, as a part of our ongoing research, we designed and synthesized 25 different substituted N-(pyrazin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides. This effort was an attempt to study the influence of different linkers connecting the pyrazine core to different aromatic moieties on antimicrobial activity and antitubercular activity in particular (amide vs. retro-amide vs. sulfonamide linkers). Nineteen of the title compounds were not previously described in literature when we searched on the 5th of March 2019 using SciFinder (Columbus, OH, USA) and Reaxys. Compounds 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, and 4b were published but not evaluated for antimycobacterial activity. We evaluated the prepared compounds for their anti-infective activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and four other nontubercular mycobacterial strains, along with antibacterial and antifungal activity evaluation. Based on the obtained results, we concluded that the introduction of a sulfonamide linker did not bring significant improvement to antimicrobial activity when compared to the other amide or retro-amide linkers. The exception includes compounds 4a (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 25 μM) and 4b (MIC_Mtb = 6.25 μg/mL, 22 μM), which showed good antitubercular activity against Mtb. Such activity may be attributed to the presence of a free amino group in the molecule, which characterizes antimicrobial sulfonamides, and not to the sulfonamide linker itself. Compounds 2a (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 25 μg/mL) and 12b (MIC_{M. kansasii} = 12.5 μg/mL) selectively inhibited the growth of Mycobacterium kansasii, suggesting that these two compounds targeted a certain pathway not common among all mycobacterial strains. Compound 13a showed promising antimycobacterial activity against M. smegmatis (MIC_{M. smegmatis} = 62.5 μg/mL, 219 μM). Some compounds showed moderate to weak activity against M. aurum. Among them all, compound 4a had a broad spectrum of antimycobacterial activity with good activity against Mtb (MIC = 6.25 μg/mL) and moderate activity against M. kansasii (MIC = 12.5 μg/mL), M. avium (MIC = 25 μg/mL), and M. aurum (MIC = 250 μg/mL). No antibacterial or antifungal activity was observed for any of the prepared compounds. Regarding in vitro cytotoxicity, when compared to reference amides or retro-amides, the title compounds had a more favorable profile. The title compounds were explored for other activities by docking studies. These studies further rationalized the antimycobacterial activity of the most active compounds 4a and 4b as inhibitors of Mtb DHPS. Finally, we presented potentially active poses of the compound 2a that could rationalize its inhibitory activity on MMP-8 or other MMP family enzymes implicated in several pathological conditions.

Supplementary Materials

Biological assays; table of outcomes of target fishing; ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR spectra of compounds 6a and 6b.

Author Contributions

G.B., M.D., and J.Z. conceived and designed the experiments; G.B., L.P.O., and C.P.d.l.r. performed chemical synthesis and purifications; G.B. performed the pKa measurements by absorbance and potentiometric methods, evaluated analytical data, and interpreted the results of anti-infective screening; M.J. performed the pKa predictions and docking studies; V.K. performed lipophilicity measurements using HPLC; O.J., K.K., and P.P. performed biological assays (antimycobacterial, antibacterial, antifungal); J.J. carried out cytotoxicity screening and interpreted the results; G.B. and M.J. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (SVV 260 401), the Grant Agency of Charles University (project C C3/1572317), EFSA-CDN (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000841) co-funded by ERDF, and by CELSA—Project title: Structure-based design of new antitubercular medicines—KU Leuven (Arthur Van Aerschot)—Charles University in Prague (Martin Doležal).

Acknowledgments

Computational resources were supplied by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the Projects CESNET (Project No. LM2015042) and CERIT-Scientific Cloud (Project No. LM2015085) provided within the program Projects of Large Research, Development and Innovations Infrastructures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of compounds are available from the authors.

Figures, Scheme and Tables

Figure 1. Design rationale: general structure of (a) pyrazinecarboxamides = amides; (b) N-pyrazinylbenzamides = retro-amides; and (c) title compounds = sulfonamides.

Figure 2. The chemical structure of (a) zibotentan, (b) halogenated N-(pyrazinyl)benzensulfonamides, and (c) sulfamethoxypyrazine (sulfalene).

Scheme 1. General synthetic reaction. R1: H/Cl; R2: refer to Table 1.

Figure 3. Linear regression of log P (calculated) plotted against log k (experimental). Equation: log P = 1.127 log k − 0.1149. (R2 = 0.9664, n = 25).

Figure 4. Chemical structures of standards (a) sulfamethoxazole, (b) sulfaclozine, (c) sulfaquinoxaline, and (d) benzenesulfonamide.

Figure 5. Structures of (a) the hypothetic product of compound 4a and (b) 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin diphosphate (HMDPdiP) used for the docking experiments. Fragment of HMDPdiP in the condensed product is in the rectangle.

Figure 6. Product of 4a (orange) and product of 4b (green) main poses from the docking experiments. The pose of 7,8-dihydropteroate (grey) corresponds to the experimentally determined position seen in bacterial DHPS [e.g., Burkholderia cenocepacia DHPS (PDB ID: 2y5s) or Bacillus anthracis DHPS (PDB ID: 3tya)].

Figure 7. Cytotoxic effect of different incubation concentrations of compound 9b on HepG2 cells.

Figure 8. (a) Compound 2a (green carbons) docked to MMP-8 (PDB ID: 5h8x) in comparison to the co-crystalized pose of the original catechol ligand (grey carbons). (b) Detail presenting interactions between pyrazine nitrogen N1′ and Zn2+ ion coordinated by His residues. (Measurements are in Å).

Table 1

Structure of prepared compounds, antimycobacterial activity expressed by minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), and HepG2 cytotoxicity expressed by IC₅₀ values.

a		b					IC50 (µM)
[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]		[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]
No.	R (the Cut Line Represents the Attachment Point)	Antimycobacterial Activity MIC (µg/mL)
		Mtb H37Rv	M. kansasii	M. avium	M. smeg	M. aurum
1a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	100	>100	≥250	≥500	>1000
1b		50	100	>100	250	≥500	731
2a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	25	>100	≥500	≥500	>500 *
2b		>100	25	>100	250	≥500	>500 *
3a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	>100	>100	>500	>500	>1000
3b		>100	>100	>100	250	125	>1000
4a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	6.25	1.56	100	≥500	250	775.6 *
4b ***		6.25	12.5	25	≥500	250	>500
5a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	50	>100	250	250	>1000
5b		100	>100	>100	250	250	364
6a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	>100	>100	≥500	≥500	>1000
6b		>100	100	>100	≥500	≥500	>1000
7b	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	100	50	>100	125	125	308
8a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	50	>100	≥500	250	>500 *
8b		50	>100	50	≥500	≥500	523.3
9a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	>100	>100	125	≥500	>250 *
9b		>100	50	>100	≥500	≥500	179.5
10a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	50	>100	≥500	≥500	>250 *
11a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	>100	>100	≥500	250	>1000
11b		>100	25	>100	≥500	≥500	778.5
12a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	100	100	>100	≥500	≥500	>250 *
12b		100	12.5	>100	≥500	≥500	302
13a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	50	>100	62.5	≥500	>500 *
13b		50	50	>100	125	250	>1000
14a	[Image omitted. Please see PDF.]	>100	100	>100	≥500	≥500	>250 *
Sulfamethoxazole		3.13	3.13	12.5	250	≥500	n.t.
Sulfaclozine		6.25	12.5	25	250	250	n.t.
Sulfaquinoxaline		3.13	12.5	50	125	250	n.t.
Benzenesulfonamide		>100	>100	>100	31.25	125	n.t.
PZA **		>100	>100	>100	≥500	≥500	>104 [20]
INH		0.2	25	12.5	15.625	3.91	79 × 103 [20]
RFM		n.t.	n.t.	n.t.	25	1.56	n.t.
CPX		n.t.	n.t.	n.t.	0.125	0.008	n.t.

* Measurement at higher concentrations was not possible due to precipitation of the tested compound in the cell culture medium. ** MIC value from testing at pH = 5.6 (acidic) is 6.25–12.5 μg/mL [2]. The value stated in the table is from testing at pH = 6.6 (neutral). *** Compound 4b is structurally identical to the sulfaclozine standard. n.t.—not tested. For structures of control drugs of the sulfonamide type refer to Figure 4.

Table 2

Experimental and calculated pKa values of compounds 6b, 9b, and 13b.

	Experimental		Calculated
No.	Absorbance Method	Potentiometric Method	ChemAxon	MOE	ChemDraw
6b	6.95	7.21	6.21	8.30	NA
9b	6.32	6.38	6.29	8.30	NA
13b	5.63	5.75	6.01	8.30	NA

Table 3

pKa values of title compounds predicted using the Chemicalize web application.

No.	pKa	No.	pKa	No.	pKa	No.	pKa	No.	pKa
1a	6.11	3b	5.76	6a	6.30	9a	6.39	12a	6.11
1b	6.05	4a	6.61	6b	6.21	9b	6.29	12b	6.05
2a	6.16	4b	6.49	7b	6.03	10a	6.38	13a	6.07
2b	6.09	5a	6.10	8a	6.12	11a	6.16	13b	6.01
3a	5.80	5b	6.03	8b	6.05	11b	6.09	14a	6.07

Table 4

Comparison between the antimycobacterial activity against Mtb H37Rv expressed by the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in µg/mL.

Substituents		Antimycobacterial Activity MIC (µg/mL) against Mtb H37Rv
R1	R2	Amide	Retro-amide	Sulfonamide
H	H	100	>100	>100 (1a)
H	4-OCH3	25	>100	>100 (6a)
6-Cl	H	>100	25	50 (1b)

R¹—substitution on pyrazine, R²—substitution on benzene.