It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic (including lockdown) is likely to have had profound but diverse implications for mental health and well-being, yet little is known about individual experiences of the pandemic (positive and negative) and how this relates to mental health and well-being, as well as other important contextual variables. Here, we analyse data sampled in a large-scale manner from 379,875 people in the United Kingdom (UK) during 2020 to identify population variables associated with mood and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to investigate self-perceived pandemic impact in relation to those variables. We report that while there are relatively small population-level differences in mood assessment scores pre- to peak-UK lockdown, the size of the differences is larger for people from specific groups, e.g. older adults and people with lower incomes. Multiple dimensions underlie peoples’ perceptions, both positive and negative, of the pandemic’s impact on daily life. These dimensions explain variance in mental health and can be statistically predicted from age, demographics, home and work circumstances, pre-existing conditions, maladaptive technology use and personality traits (e.g., compulsivity). We conclude that a holistic view, incorporating the broad range of relevant population factors, can better characterise people whose mental health is most at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people’s health and well-being. Here, the authors characterize self-reported impact of the pandemic (positive and negative) at a large scale in the United Kingdom, and show variance among individual circumstances.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Imperial College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)
2 Imperial College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); King’s College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
3 King’s College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
4 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.450563.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0412 9303); University of Cambridge, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
5 University of Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
6 University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.467048.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0465 4159)