Introduction
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) indicates difficulty in maintaining a desired level of wakefulness and alertness at appropriate times during the day. It is estimated that 5–30% of the general population endorses complaints of EDS.1–4 Growing evidence suggests that EDS is associated with a broad range of clinical and non-clinical consequences, including increased risk of motor vehicle accidents,5 occupational injuries,6 and loss of productivity,7 along with cognitive impairment,8 reduced quality of life and increased socioeconomic burden.9 Associations between EDS and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, have also been reported in multiple studies.2,10 Although a few studies found no relationship between EDS and cardiovascular diseases,11,12 the majority of published reports showed significantly increased risk of prevalent and incident cardiovascular diseases in individuals with EDS.13–19 However, there is little evidence on the implications of EDS for cardiovascular mortality. To our knowledge, only a few studies assessed this relationship, yielding mixed results. EDS was a significant predictor of cardiovascular death in a community-dwelling cohort of 8269 older (≥65 years) adults.20 Conversely, two other prospective population-based studies on urban community residents (≥40 years)13 and a general population sample of men aged 30–69 years21 reported no significant association between EDS and cardiovascular death. Furthermore, it should be noted that none of these studies controlled for the potential role of sleep duration or comorbid sleep disorders and that no study has assessed the association of EDS and cardiovascular mortality in the general population including both males and females.
Therefore, we sought to clarify the association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality using the combined nationally representative data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006 and NHANES 2007–2008.
Patients and Methods Data Source
NHANES comprises a series of ongoing, cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys of non-institutionalized US civilians. A stratified, multistage probability sampling method is applied to select participants.22 Data on demographics, socioeconomic status, health conditions, and health-related behaviors were collected during in-home interviews while physical measurements and laboratory data were obtained using mobile examination centers (MEC). Mortality data were acquired through linkage to the National Death Index. NHANES protocols were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Study Population
Data from two NHANES cycles (ie, 2005–2006 and 2007–2008) were combined based on the questionnaire enabled collection of sleep disorders and symptoms in these cycles. A total of 10,914 adult participants were enrolled in NHANES 2005–2008. After excluding participants who were pregnant or uncertain of pregnancy status (women aged between 20 and 59 years not taking pregnancy test) (n=552), or those missing sleepiness (n=20) or mortality (n=12) data, 10,330 adult participants (aged ≥20 years) were included in the final analysis (Figure A in supplement).
Assessment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness
Data on daytime sleepiness were obtained during in-home interviews using a sleep questionnaire. Daytime sleepiness was determined by the question "In the past month, how often do you feel overly sleepy during the day?" with possible responses being "Never, Rarely (1 time a month), Sometimes (2–4 times a month), Often (5–15 times a month) and Almost Always (16–30 times a month)." We categorized participants into three groups according to the responses: never, rarely/sometimes, and often/always, which were, respectively, defined as no, mild and excessive daytime sleepiness consistent with a prior study.20
Ascertainment of Cardiovascular Mortality
Vital status was ascertained by linkage to the National Death Index through December 31, 2015. Details of the linking methods are described by the National Center for Health statistics.23 Causes of death were classified according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. Cardiovascular mortality was defined as death caused by hypertensive heart disease (I11), hypertensive heart and renal diseases (I13), ischemic heart disease (I20-I25), acute rheumatic fever and chronic rheumatic heart diseases (I00-I09) and other heart diseases (I26-I51) including heart failure (I50) and atrial fibrillation (I48).
Covariates
Socioeconomic factors including age, sex, race (Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and other), family income (<$20,000/year or not), and education (ever attend college or not) were also obtained from in-home interview questionnaires. Sleep duration was determined by the question "How much sleep do you usually get at night on weekdays or workdays?" and we categorized the sleep duration into three groups (≤6h, 7–8h or ≥9h). Sleep disorders were ascertained by a positive response (‘yes') to the questions "Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have a sleep disorder?" and if the participant responded with ‘yes', type of sleep disorders (sleep apnea, insomnia, restless legs and other) would be required. Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities were obtained from both in-home interview questionnaires and laboratory examination or tests from mobile examination centers: Alcohol consumption was determined by the question ‘Have you ever had at least 12 alcohol drinks per year?'. Smoking was categorized into current (‘Yes' to the question ‘Do you now smoke cigarettes'), former (‘Yes' to the question ‘Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life' but ‘No' to the question ‘Do you now smoke cigarettes') and never (‘No' to the question ‘Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life'). Hypercholesterolemia was defined as self-reported history of hypercholesterolemia, serum cholesterol level ≥240 mg/dL [multiply by 0.02586 to get mmol/L] or being told to take prescriptions for cholesterol lowering, similar to the determination of hypertension (self-reported history of high blood pressure, mean blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or being told to take prescribed medicine for high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (self-reported history of diabetes, fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dL [multiply by 0.0555 to get mmol/L], hemoglobin A1C ≥6.5% or now taking insulin or blood glucose lowering medication) and chronic kidney diseases (self-reported history of having weak or failing kidneys, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or albumin-to-creatinine ratio >30 mg/g). GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.24 Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD, ‘yes' to the question ‘told by a doctor have emphysema or chronic bronchitis') and cancer (‘Yes' to the question ‘ever told by a doctor you had cancer or malignancy') were all determined by participants' self-reported medical history. Cardiovascular disease was determined by the reporting of any one of the following conditions: congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack and stroke. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item survey (PHQ-9, ranging from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms), with a score ≥10 indicative of major depression.25 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by objectively measured weight (kg) divided by height in meters squared (m2).
Statistical Analysis
Complex survey design factors in NHANES, including sample weights, clustering, and stratification were all taken into account as recommended.26 Baseline characteristics were compared across daytime sleepiness categories using the Rao-Scott χ2 test for categorical variables and analysis of variance adjusted for sampling weights for continuous variables.27
Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by Cox proportional hazards models using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) and a two tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Follow-up was presented as person-years from baseline to the date of death, loss to follow-up, or December 31, 2015. We built 3 Cox proportional regression models to assess the association between degree of daytime sleepiness (no daytime sleepiness, mild daytime sleepiness or EDS, with no daytime sleepiness as reference) and cardiovascular mortality. First (Model 1), we adjusted for socioeconomic factors including age, sex, race, family income, and education. Then we further adjusted for comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors including alcohol, smoking, BMI (kg/m2), hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, depression, COPD, cancer, and chronic kidney diseases in Model 2. Finally, in Model 3, we further adjusted for sleep duration and sleep disorders.
To test the robustness of our results and particularly the possibility of reverse causation, we performed sensitivity analyses by excluding participants who died within six months from baseline interview and by analyzing participants with or without cardiovascular disease at baseline. Furthermore, we investigated whether the relationship between EDS and cardiovascular mortality varied by age, sex, and BMI.
Results Baseline Characteristics
Baseline characteristics of study population are presented in Table 1. Weighted mean age was 47.3 years (95% CI, 46.0 to 48.1 years) and the majority of participants were non-Hispanic White (71.1%). EDS was reported by 18.5% of participants, while 51.1% reported mild daytime sleepiness and 30.4% reported no daytime sleepiness. Compared with participants reporting no daytime sleepiness, those reporting EDS were slightly younger, more likely to be female, and non-Hispanic White. EDS participants had higher BMI and were more likely to have lower income, cardiovascular disease, COPD, and depression. Prevalence of sleep disorders and short sleep duration was also greater among those with EDS (Table 1).
Association Between EDS and Cardiovascular Mortality
During a mean follow-up of 8.3 years (85,673 person-years), a total of 262 cardiovascular deaths occurred. The crude cardiovascular mortality rate was 3.06 per 1000 person-years.
Compared with participants without daytime sleepiness, participants with EDS exhibited significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death (HR, 2.53, 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.03) in multivariable analysis controlled for sociodemographic factors (Model 1, Table 2). The association between EDS and cardiovascular death was not attenuated by additional adjustment for baseline comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors (Model 2, HR, 2.85, 95% CI, 1.33 to 6.09). Further correction for sleep duration and sleep disorders (Model 3, HR, 2.55, 95% CI, 1.23 to 5.27) weakened the association only marginally (Figure 1 and Table 2).
Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses
To examine whether the association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality varies based on demographic characteristics, we conducted subgroup analyses according to baseline age (>65 years vs ≥65 years), sex (male vs female) and BMI (≥30 kg/m2 vs <30 kg/m2). Similar results were observed in these subgroups in the fully adjusted model 3 (Figure 2) and no interactions between EDS and age, sex or BMI were observed (P for interaction >0.05). However, men with EDS tended to have higher risk of cardiovascular mortality than women.
Exclusion of participants who died within six months from baseline interview did not diminish the strength of the association between EDS and cardiovascular death (HR, 2.45, 95% CI, 1.20 to 5.00). The relationship between EDS and cardiovascular mortality was evident in participants without cardiovascular disease at baseline (HR, 2.34, 95% CI, 0.82 to 6.67), and similar to those with cardiovascular disease at baseline (HR, 2.57, 95% CI, 0.81 to 8.15), but did not reach statistical significance likely due to the relatively low number of events (Table 3).
Discussion
In this prospective study of a representative sample of US adults, as far as we know, we first found that EDS was independently associated with an approximately two-and-a-half fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to absence of daytime sleepiness even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors, sleep duration and sleep disorders. No interaction between EDS and age, sex or BMI was observed, but males with EDS tended to have higher risk of cardiovascular mortality than females. Additionally, we found that the prevalence of EDS was quite high with nearly one in five (18.5%) adults reporting EDS in NHANES 2005–2008.
Comparison with Other Studies
The relationship between EDS and cardiovascular mortality has been rarely studied and current evidence is conflicting. To our knowledge, only a few prospective studies have assessed the relationship between EDS and cardiovascular mortality. The Three City Study20 defined EDS as self-reported regular or frequent feeling of being excessively sleepy during the day and found that EDS was associated with significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death. However, that study only assessed the association in elderly participants (≥65 years) while we included both younger and older adults (all subjects ≥20 years) from a nationally representative sample and observed no interaction between EDS and age (P for interaction = 0.290). Moreover, the Three City Study20 did not adjust for sleep apnea, restless legs or sleep duration, which have been reported as important risk factors for cardiovascular mortality.28–31 Lindberg et al21 conducted a prospective study enrolling 3100 male participants aged 30–69 years using a postal survey. After a 10-year follow-up, they reported no association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality. Nevertheless, the significantly higher mortality rate observed by the authors in the non-responders suggested that findings of this study were likely to be biased. In addition, Lindberg et al only controlled for age in their analysis. After analyzing the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) data without adjusting for sleep disorders, Boden-Albala et al13 reported that EDS was significantly associated with stroke but not cardiovascular mortality in the general population aged 30–69 years. However, the small sample size of 2088 participants and shorter follow-up duration (5.1 years) in NOMAS might be the reason for the non-significant association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality, as the hazard ratio for cardiovascular mortality was 1.91 (95% CI, 0.98 to 3.73). A meta-analysis pooling data from the three studies showed EDS was associated with significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.19 However, as the three original studies included in the meta-analysis did not properly adjust for the potential confounders (especially sleep apnea and sleep duration), results of this meta-analysis were not conclusive. The present study, using a large nationally representative sample and adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors including comorbid sleep disorders, provides robust evidence for EDS as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in the general adult population. Supporting our finding, a cohort study with 0.5 million adults showed that self-reported difficulty in keeping sober-minded during the daytime was associated with increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease even after adjustment for multiple potential confounders including symptoms of early morning awakening and difficulties in initiating or maintaining sleep.32 Moreover, EDS has also been associated with 23% increase of all-cause mortality in a recent meta-analysis.19 Additionally, similar to the association between EDS and all-cause mortality,33 the association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality appeared stronger in males than females although no interaction between sex and EDS was observed.
Potential Mechanisms
Mechanisms that underlie the association between EDS and cardiovascular mortality remain poorly understood. EDS could be an early sign of developing cardiovascular or metabolic disease as multiple studies have reported association of EDS with cardiovascular diseases13–19,34 and obesity or diabetes.2,10 Results of a recent genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) illustrating significant positive genetic correlations between EDS and coronary heart disease and obesity provides further support for this hypothesis.35 In the same GWAS study, using Mendelian Randomization analysis, the authors also reported a potential causal association of higher BMI and diabetes with excessive daytime sleepiness.35 Chronic low-grade inflammation, an established mechanism for cardiovascular disease,36,37 obesity and diabetes,38,39 could be the key biological mechanism of these observed associations between EDS and cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. Indeed, many studies have shown transient increase in subjective sleepiness following endotoxin administration40,41 and the association of sleepiness with inflammation among patients with sleep apnea42,43 also provide as evidence for the inflammation hypothesis. However, considering scant evidence, further studies are needed to explore potential mechanism of the observed association.
Clinical Implications
Findings of the present study emphasize the importance of screening EDS in risk stratification and daily clinical practice, as we found that EDS was independently associated with an approximately two-and-a-half fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in a nationally representative cohort, a stronger predictor of cardiovascular death than some long established risk factors such as hypertension,44,45 obesity,46,47 and sedentary lifestyle.48,49 Therefore, screening for EDS could help identify patients at high risk of cardiovascular mortality and thus provide potential opportunity for early interventions in the clinical setting. Since screening for EDS is simple and cost-effective compared with common cardiovascular disease biomarkers and may describe cardiovascular risk beyond traditional risk factors, EDS screening holds promise for improving identification of high-risk patients or underlying disorders. Furthermore, the association with increased risk of all-cause mortality demonstrated in a meta-analysis19 and the high prevalence of EDS observed in the present study and in previous studies20,50,51 also argue in favor of EDS screening in daily clinical practice.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths of the present study include a large and nationally representative sample, long follow-up duration, high follow-up rate and extensive adjustment for potential confounders including sleep disorders and sleep duration. The present study has several limitations as well. First, the cardiovascular mortality analyzed in the present study did not include deaths due to stroke as NHANES 2007–2008 did not provide such data. Thus, our findings may not be generalized for the association between EDS and cerebrovascular mortality. Second, we used self-reported daytime sleepiness with one question which may lead to some power loss due to potential misclassification. Nevertheless, a previous study has shown that single question on sleepiness was significantly associated with the well-established Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS) for assessing EDS and the diagnostic specificity could be as high as 0.99.52 Although multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) is an objective tool to assess daytime sleepiness, it is not very practical to use it in large epidemiological studies and therefore have not been widely used in epidemiological studies. Furthermore, the large and representative sample may have mitigated the potential effect of misclassification. Third, considering the fact that sleep apnea remains quite underdiagnosed,53 we cannot rule out potential confounding effect of sleep apnea although we have adjusted for baseline sleep disorders. However, a recent study has found that significant increase of cardiovascular mortality was only observed in sleep apnea patients with EDS,54 and sleep apnea patients with EDS are much less likely to be undiagnosed. Therefore, the potential confounding effect of sleep apnea may have compromised by this fact. Fourth, although we have extensively adjusted for potential confounders, we were unable to exclude any potential effect of napping on the observed association between daytime sleepiness and cardiovascular mortality, as data on napping was not collected in NHANES. Lastly, we could not preclude the possibility of unidentified confounders in the observed associations as the present study is an observational study by nature. Therefore, future study is needed to confirm our findings.
Conclusion
Excessive daytime sleepiness is highly prevalent among US adults and is independently associated with an approximately two-and-a-half fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in a large national sample. Screening for excessive daytime sleepiness may be a simple and cost-effective tool for identifying individuals at high risk of cardiovascular death.
Data Sharing Statement
All data in this study are publicly available from the NHANES study website (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ContinuousNhanes/Default.aspx?BeginYear=2005).
Funding
These studies were supported in part by a grant from Sleep Number Corporation to the Mayo Clinic. VKS is supported by NIH HL65176, HL134885 and HL134808. JB is supported by T32 HL-007111. EM is supported by T32 HL 105355. JGL is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82004301). NC is supported by NIH HL134885 and HL134808, by a grant from Sleep Number Corporation to the Mayo Clinic and by the Mayo Clinic Marie Ingalls Research Career Development Award. The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclosure
VKS has served as a consultant for Respicardia, Baker Tilly, Bayer and Jazz Pharmaceuticals and serves on the Sleep Number Research Advisory Board. VKS also reports grants from Sleep Number, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Respicardia, personal fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and personal fees from Baker Tilly outside the submitted work. All other authors claimed no conflicts of interest.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Purpose: Excessive daytime sleepiness is highly prevalent and has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, but evidence for its association with cardiovascular mortality is limited and inconsistent. We aimed to determine whether excessive daytime sleepiness is independently associated with cardiovascular mortality in general adult population.
Patients and Methods: A prospective study of 10,330 adult participants (aged ≥ 20 years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005– 2006 and 2007– 2008 was followed up until December 31st, 2015. Excessive daytime sleepiness was defined as the self-reported feeling of being overly sleepy often or always during the day. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated to assess risk for cardiovascular mortality.
Results: A total of 10,330 participants with mean age of 47.3 years (95% CI, 46.0 to 48.1) were included in this analysis. Approximately, 18.5% of US adults reported excessive daytime sleepiness. Over a mean follow-up of 8.3 years, 262 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Participants with excessive daytime sleepiness had 2.85-times greater risk (95% CI, 1.33– 6.09) of cardiovascular death than those without daytime sleepiness in multivariable analysis corrected for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors including depression. Further adjustment for self-reported sleep disorders and sleep duration only slightly attenuated this association (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.23– 5.27). No interactions between excessive daytime sleepiness and age, sex or cardiovascular disease at study entry were observed (all Ps> 0.05).
Conclusion: Excessive daytime sleepiness is highly prevalent among US adults and is independently associated with an approximately two-and-a-half-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in a large national sample. Screening for excessive daytime sleepiness may be a simple and cost-effective tool for identifying individuals at high risk of cardiovascular death.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer