It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this experiment, the firefighters perform the cultural assets disaster rescue drills before and after the cognitive differences as the core of the experiment. Firefighters develop education in the face of various types of building rescue training, but they lack the type of historical and historical buildings, which are fundamental in nature. The difference between the rescue target and the rescue tactics, and other types of building rescue methods can hardly be applied. The subject of this experiment is to introduce fire rescue resources (public assistance) after the failure of self-disaster prevention (self-help, co-help), and the research object is based on historical building. After many field surveys, knowledge training and actual exercises, the comparison is performed. The fire extinguishing education and training research on historical monuments can improve the effectiveness of historical monument fire extinguishing and preserve the current status of historical monuments, can list the number of cultural relics rescue personnel from 30% to 60%, can increase the number of cultural relics from 20% to 50%, can answer the answer to the room rescue from 20% to 100%, can answer the perimeter protection focus from 40% increase to 100%, can say that the focus of the water is increased from 30% to 100%. From the data, through the drills, the correct rescue concept can be greatly improved, and the secondary damage of historical sites can be avoided, but the focus of the rescue is on the cultural relics. It still needs to be strengthened, so the drills still need to be handled with perseverance in order to be more implemented and popularized.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan (R.O.C.
2 Department of Graduate Institute of Political Science, THU, Taiwan (R.O.C.