It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We estimate the mass and energy budgets for the 2018 phreatic eruption of Mt. Motoshirane on Kusatsu–Shirane volcano, Japan, based on data obtained from a network of eight tiltmeters and weather radar echoes. The tilt records can be explained by a subvertical crack model. Small craters that were formed by previous eruptions are aligned WNW–ESE, which is consistent with the strike of the crack modeled in this study. The direction of maximum compressive stress in this region is horizontal and oriented WNW–ESE, allowing fluid to intrude from depth through a crack with this orientation. Based on the crack model, hypocenter distribution, and MT resistivity structure, we infer that fluid from a hydrothermal reservoir at a depth of 2 km below Kusatsu–Shirane volcano has repeatedly ascended through a pre-existing subvertical crack. The inflation and deflation volumes during the 2018 eruption are estimated to have been 5.1 × 105 and 3.6 × 105 m3, respectively, meaning that 1.5 × 105 m3 of expanded volume formed underground. The total heat associated with the expanded volume is estimated to have been ≥ 1014 J, similar to or exceeding the annual heat released from Yugama Crater Lake of Mt. Shirane and that from the largest eruption during the past 130 year. Although the ejecta mass of the 2018 phreatic eruption was small, the eruption at Mt. Motoshirane was not negligible in terms of the energy budget of Kusatsu–Shirane volcano. A water mass of 0.1–2.0 × 107 kg was discharged as a volcanic cloud, based on weather radar echoes, which is smaller than the mass associated with the deflation. We suggest that underground water acted as a buffer against the sudden intrusion of hydrothermal fluids, absorbing some of the fluid that ascended through the crack.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Volcanic Fluid Research Center, School of Science, Meguro, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
2 Kyoto University, Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kagoshima, Japan (GRID:grid.258799.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 2033)
3 Tohoku University, Research Center for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions, Graduate School of Science, Sendai, Japan (GRID:grid.69566.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 6943)
4 Kyoto University, Aso Volcanological Laboratory, Kumamoto, Japan (GRID:grid.258799.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 2033)
5 Hokkaido University, Institute of Seismology and Volcanology, Faculty of Science, Sapporo, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691)
6 Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Volcanology Research Department, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.237586.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0597 9981)